Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Ortaokul Öğrencileri Arasında Siber Zorbalık / Cyber Bullying Among Secondary School Students

Year 2021, Volume: 12 Issue: 5, 255 - 272, 31.12.2021

Kemal Kayıkçı , Pınar Bayram

https://doi.org/10.19160/e-ijer.1025560

Abstract

İletişim teknolojisinin çeşitlenmesi, kullanımının öğrenciler arasında yaygınlanşması ve sosyal medya olanaklarının artması ile birlikte öğrencilerin maruz oldukları siber zorbalık davranışları büyük ölçüde artmıştüır. Sosyal medya ve teknolojiye kolay ulaşılması, bu alandaki denetimin zorlukları ve öğrenci özellikleri siber zorbalığın artmasına neden olurken bu durum okulda ve sınıfta önemli disiplin sorunlarına neden olmaktadır. Siber zorbalık sadece okulda disiplin sorunlarına neden olmakla kalmıyor aynı zamanda öğrenciler üzerinde ciddi psikolojik ve psikosomatik etkiler yaratarak eğitim haklarından mahrum olmalarına neden olabilmektedir. Bu araştırmanın amacı ortaokul öğrencileri arasında görülen siber zorbalığı ve siber zorbalık mağduru öğrenciler ile bu öğrencilerin öğretmenlerinin bu duruma karşı gösterdikleri tepkileri incelemektir. Araştırma Nitel araştırma desenlerinden durum çalışması deseninde hazırlanmıştır. Araştırmanın çalışma grubunu kolay ulaşılabilir örnekleme yöntemiyle Antalya Muratpaşa, Aksu ve Manavgat’ta bulunan 4 ortaokuldan amaçlı örneklem yöntemlerinden ölçüt örnekleme yöntemiyle seçilen 10 öğretmen ve 2 okul yöneticisi oluşturmuştur. Araştırmada veriler doküman incelemesi ve görüşme yöntemiyle elde edilmiştir. Görüşme yöntemiyle elde edilen veriler betimsel ve içerik analizi teknikleriyle analiz edilmiştir. Yapılan analiz sonucunda öğretmenlerin siber zorbalık araçlarını, genel bir tanımla internet olarak gördükleri sonucuna varılmıştır. Siber zorbalığa maruz kalan öğrencilerin tedirgin ve gergin oldukları, içlerine kapandıkları, derslerinde başarısız oldukları, korktukları ve genel depresyon davranışları sergiledikleri sonucuna varılmıştır. Katılımcılara göre öğrencileri siber zorbalığa maruz kalan öğretmenler, öncelikle öğrenci ile iletişim kurma yoluna gitmektedir.

Keywords

Öğretmen Ortaokul Siber zorbalık Disiplin problemleri

Supporting Institution

YOK

Project Number

YLOK

Thanks

YOK

References

  • Agatston, P. W., Kowalski, R., & Limber, S. (2007). Student‟s perspective on cyber bullying. Journal of Adolescent Health, 41, 59–60. https://doi.org.10.1016/j.jadohealth.2007.09.003.
  • Anderson, K. L. (2012). New kid on the block. (Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi). California State Universittesi, California.
  • Ayas, T. (2008). İlköğretim okullarına yönelik geliştirilen zorbaca davranışları önleme programının etkinliğinin test edilmesi. (Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi). Ankara Üniversitesi, Ankara.
  • Ayas, T., & Horzum, B. M. (2011). Öğretmenlerin sanal zorbalık algılarının çeşitli değişkenlere göre incelenmesi. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 3, 619–640. https://doi.org/10.17679/inuefd.298529.
  • Ayas, T., & Horzum, B. M. (2012). İlköğretim öğrencilerinin sanal zorba ve mağdur olma durumu. İlköğretim Online(11), 369-380. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/90580.
  • Ayas, T., & Horzum, B. M. (2013). İlköğretim öğrencilerinin internet bağımlılığı ve aile internet tutumu. Türk Psikolojik Danışma ve Rehberlik Dergisi(4), 46-57. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/200124.
  • Baştürk-Akça, E., Sayımer, İ., & Ergül, S. (2015). Ortaokul öğrencilerinin sosyal medya kullanımları ve siber zorbalık deneyimleri: Ankara örneği. Global Media Journal TR Edition, 5(10), 71-86.
  • Bauman, S., Toomey, R. B., & Walker, J. L. (2013). Associations among bullying, cyberbullying, and suicide in high school students. Journal of Adolescence, 36(2), 341-350.
  • Belsey, B. (2006). Cyberbullying: an emerging threat to the always on generation. http://www.billbelsey.com/?p=1827 sitesinden erişilmiştir.
  • Beran, T., & Li, Q. (2005). Cyber-harassment: A study of a new method for an old behavior. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 32(3), 265-277. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2190/8YQM-B04H-PG4D-BLLH.
  • Bhat, C. S. (2008). Cyber Bullying: Overview and strategies for school counsellors, guidance officers, and all school personnel. Australian Journal of Guidance and Counselling, 1(1), 53-66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1375/ajgc.18.1.53.
  • Biegler, S., & Boyd, D. (2010). Risky behaviors and online safety: A 2010 Literature Review. https://www.zephoria.org/files/2010SafetyLitReview.pdf sitesinden erişilmiştir.
  • Bourassa, C. A. (2012). Student cyberbullying: raising awareness for school counselors. (Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi). University of Wisconsin-Stout, Menomonie, ABD.
  • Campbell, M. A. (2005). Cyber bullying: An old problem in a new guise? Australian Journal of Guidance and Counselling, 15(1), 68-76. DOI:10.1375/ajgc.15.1.68.
  • Chapin, J. (2016). Adolescents and cyber bullying: The precaution adoption process model. Education and Information Technologies, 21(4), 719-728. DOI:10.1007/s10639-014-9349-1.
  • Dilmaç, B., Deniz, M. E., & Aydoğan, D. (2009). İlköğretim öğrencilerinde sosyal destek ve siber zorbalığın incelenmesi. 18. Ulusal Eğitim Bilimleri Kurultayı, 1-3 Ekim, (s. 1-4). İzmir. Erişim: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/315792444_Bilgisayar_Ve_Ogretim_Teknolojileri_Ogretmenligi_Bolumu_4_Sinif_Ogrencilerinin_Sanal_Zorbalik_Hakkindaki_Farkindalik_Durumlarinin_Farkli_Degiskenlerce_Incelenmesi.
  • Duff, P. A. (2008). Case study research in applied linguistic. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Erdur, B. Ö., & Kavsut, F. (2007). Akran Zorbalığının Yeni Yüzü:Siber Zorbalık. Eurasian Journal Of Educational Research, 27, 31-42. Erişim: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/324476306_Akran_Zorbaliginin_Yeni_Yuzu_Siber_Zorbalik_Cyber_Bullying_A_New_Face_of_Peer_Bullying/link/5acf21524585154f3f460942/download. Eroğlu, Y., & Güler, N. (2015). Koşullu öz-değer, riskli internet davranışları ve siber zorbalık/ mağduriyet ilişkinin incelenmesi. Sakarya University Journal of Education, 5(3), 118-129. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19126/suje.04882.
  • Festl, R. (2016). Perpetrators on the internet: Analyzing individual and structural explanation factors of cyberbullying in school context. Computers in Human Behavior(59), 237-248. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19148/ijhbs.365829.
  • Flannery, D. J., Wester, K. L., & Singer, M. I. (2004). Impact of exposure to violence in school on child and adolescent mental health and behavior. Journal of Community Psychology(32), 559-573. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.20019.
  • Gardner, M. C. (2010). Principals‟ perceptions of cyberbullying policies in selected Florida middle schools. (Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi). University of Central Florida College of Education, Florida.
  • Hays, P. A. (2004). Case study research. K. de Marrais ve S. D. Lapan (Yay. Haz.). Foundation for research: Methods of inquiry in education and the social sciences (s.218-234)Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Hinduja, S., & Patchin, J. (2008). Cyberbullying: An exploratory analysis of factors related to offending and victimization. Deviant Behavior(29), 129-156. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01639620701457816.
  • Hinduja, S., & Patchin, J. W. (2010). Bullying, Cyberbullying and Suicide. Archives of Suicide Research, 14(3), 206– 221. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13811118.2010.494133.
  • Hoover, J. H., Oliver, R., & Thomson, K. (1993). Perceived victimization by school bullies: New research and future directions. Journal of Humanistic Education and Development(32), 76-84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2164-4683.1993.tb00133.x.
  • Juvonen, J., & Gross, E. F. (2008). Extending the school grounds?—Bullying experiences in cyberspace. Journal of School Health, 78(9), 496-505. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1746-1561.2008.00335.x.
  • Karasar, N. (2015). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemi. İstanbul: Nobel Yayıncılık. Leung, A. N., Wong, N., & Farver, J. M. (2017). Cyberbullying in Hong Kong Chinese students: Life satisfaction, and the moderating role of friendship qualities on cyberbullying victimization and perpetration. Personality and Individual Differences(133), 7-12. DOI: DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.07.016
  • Li, Q. (2006). Cyberbullying in schools: A research of gender differences. School Pyschology International(27), 157-170. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0143034306064547.
  • Li, Q. (2007). Bullying in the new playground: Research into cyberbullying and cyber victimisation. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology(23), 435–454. Erişim: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/4903/48dcd182d2f3e9d59e5fa375f2aeb6482343.pdf.
  • Mark, L. K. (2009). Student, educator, and parent perceptions of cyber bullying in three Hawai’i middle schools. (Unpublished thesis). University of Hawai’i Educational Psychology, Hawai.
  • Mason, K. L. (2008). Cyberbullying: A preliminary assessment for school personnel. Psychology in the Schools, 45(4), 323-348. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20301. Merriam, S. B. (1988). Case study research in education: A qualitative approach San Fransisco, CA: Jossey –Bass.
  • METK (1973). 1739 Sayılı Milli eğitim temel kanunu. 24,06.1973 tarih ve 14574 sayılı Resmi Gazete
  • Mitchell, K.J., Ybarra, M..L., & Finkelhor, D. (2007). The relative ımportance of online victimization in understanding depression, delinquency, and substance use. Child Maltreatment, 12, 314-324
  • Paker, T. (2015). Durum çalışması. F. N. Seggie ve Y. Bayyurt. Nitel araştırma: yöntem, teknik, analiz ve yaklaşımlar. (s. 119-134). Ankara: Anı Yayıncılık
  • Patchin, J. W., & Hinduja, S. (2006). Bullies move beyond the schoolyard a preliminary look at cyberbullying. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 4(2), 148-169. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1541204006286288.
  • Price, M., & Dalgleish, J. (2010). Cyberbullying: Experiences, impacts and coping strategies as described by Australian young people. Youth Studies Australia, 29(2), 51-59. Erişim: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/284793882_Cyberbullying_Experiences_impacts_and_coping_strategies_as_described_by_Australian_young_people.
  • Santrock, J. W. (2012). Akranlar, romantik ilişkiler ve yaşam tarzı. d. m. siyez içinde, ergenlik (s. 204-329). Ankara: Nobel Yayınevi.
  • Schneider, S., O'Donnell, L., Stueve, A., & Coulter, R. S. (2012). Cyberbullying, school bullying, and psychological distress: A regional census of high school students. American Journal Of Public Health, 102(1), 171-177. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2011.300308.
  • Sezer, M., Şahin, I., & Aktürk, A. O. (2013). Cyber bullying victimization of elementary school students and their reflections on the victimization. International Journal of Social, Human Science and Engineering, 7(12), 1989-1992. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19148/ijhbs.365829.
  • Sleglova, V., & Cerna, A. (2011). Cyberbullying in adolescent victims: Perception and coping. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 5(2), 1-12. Erişim: https://cyberpsychology.eu/article/view/4248/3294.
  • Slojen, R., Smith, K. P., & Frisen, A. (2012). The nature of cyberbullying, and strategies for prevention, computers in human behavior. New York: Elsevier Ltd.
  • Sourander, A., Klomek, A. B., Ikonen, M., Lindroos, J., Luntamo, T., Koskelainen, M., Helenius, H. (2010). Psychosocial risk factors associated with cyberbullying among adolescents: A population-based study. Archives of General Psychiatr, 67(7), 720-728. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2010.79
  • Taştekin, E. (2016). Ergenlerin arkadaşlık ilişkileri ve benlik saygısı ile siber zorbalık ve siber mağduriyet arasındaki ilişkiler. (Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi). Hacettepe Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara.
  • Thomas, S. P. (2006). From the editor—the phenomenon of cyberbullying. Issues in Mental Health Nursing, 27(10), 1015-1016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01612840600943762.
  • Thompsen, P. A. (1996). What's fueling the flames in cyberspace: A social influence model. L. Strate, R. Jacobson, & S. B. Gibson içinde, Communication and cyberspace: Social interaction in an electronic environment (s. 297-315). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
  • Topcu, Ç., & Erdur-Baker, Ö. (2016). Zorbalığa uğrayan ergenlerin yardım alma davranışı ve yardım kaynakları. Ege Eğitim Dergisi, 17(1), 127-145. Erişim: https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/225063.
  • Vandebosch, H., & Cleemput, K. V. (2006). Cyberbullying among youngsters in Flanders. Erişim: http://www.oecdsbv. net/Templates/Article.aspx?id=379.
  • Willard, N. (2007). Educator’s guide to cyberbullying and cyberthreats. Erişim: http://cyber-safe-kids.com.
  • Willard, N. E. (2007). Cyberbullying and cyberthreats: Responding to the challenge of online social aggression, threats, and distress. US: Research Press.
  • Yaman, E. (2012). Ergenlerin siber zorbalık ve siber mağduriyete ilişkin algıları. Gaziantep Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 11(3), 819-833. Erişim: https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/223319.
  • Yaman, E. ve Peker, A. (2012). Ergenlerin siber zorbalık ve siber mağduriyete ilişkin algıları. Gaziantep Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi. 11(3):819 -833 (http://sbe.gantep.edu.tr)
  • Ybarra, M. L., & Mitchell, K. J. (2004). Online aggressor/targets, aggressors, and targets: A comparison of associated youth characteristics. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 45(7), 1308-1316. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2004.00328.x.
  • Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2008). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.
  • Yılmaz, H. (2011). Cyberbullying in Turkish middle schools: An exploratory study. School Psychology International, 32(6), 645-654. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0143034311410262
  • Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage

Cyber Bullying Among Secondary School Students / Ortaokul Öğrencileri Arasında Siber Zorbalık

Year 2021, Volume: 12 Issue: 5, 255 - 272, 31.12.2021

Kemal Kayıkçı , Pınar Bayram

https://doi.org/10.19160/e-ijer.1025560

Abstract

With the diversification of communication technology, its widespread use among students and the increase in social media opportunities, the cyberbullying behaviors that students are exposed to have greatly increased. Easy access to social media and technology, difficulties in control in this area and student characteristics cause cyberbullying to increase and this situation causes significant disciplinary problems at school and in the classroom. Cyberbullying not only causes disciplinary problems at school, but also creates serious psychological and psychosomatic effects on students, causing them to be deprived of their educational rights. The aim of this study is to examine the cyber bullying among secondary school students and the attitudes of teachers against cyber bullying. For this purpose, 10 teachers and 2 managers working in Antalya were interviewed. In the interview, questions regarding the definition and instruments of cyber bullying, and the duties of all actors in case of cyber bullying were asked. Collected data were qualitatively analyzed. As a result of the analysis, it was concluded that teachers perceive cyberbullying tools as internet in a general definition. It was concluded that students exposed to cyberbullying are anxious and nervous, withdrawn, fail, fear, and exhibit general depression behaviors. According to the participants, when a student is exposed to cyberbullying, teachers first try to communicate with the student.

Keywords

Teacher Secondary school Cyber bullying Discipline problems

Project Number

YLOK

References

  • Agatston, P. W., Kowalski, R., & Limber, S. (2007). Student‟s perspective on cyber bullying. Journal of Adolescent Health, 41, 59–60. https://doi.org.10.1016/j.jadohealth.2007.09.003.
  • Anderson, K. L. (2012). New kid on the block. (Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi). California State Universittesi, California.
  • Ayas, T. (2008). İlköğretim okullarına yönelik geliştirilen zorbaca davranışları önleme programının etkinliğinin test edilmesi. (Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi). Ankara Üniversitesi, Ankara.
  • Ayas, T., & Horzum, B. M. (2011). Öğretmenlerin sanal zorbalık algılarının çeşitli değişkenlere göre incelenmesi. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 3, 619–640. https://doi.org/10.17679/inuefd.298529.
  • Ayas, T., & Horzum, B. M. (2012). İlköğretim öğrencilerinin sanal zorba ve mağdur olma durumu. İlköğretim Online(11), 369-380. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/90580.
  • Ayas, T., & Horzum, B. M. (2013). İlköğretim öğrencilerinin internet bağımlılığı ve aile internet tutumu. Türk Psikolojik Danışma ve Rehberlik Dergisi(4), 46-57. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/200124.
  • Baştürk-Akça, E., Sayımer, İ., & Ergül, S. (2015). Ortaokul öğrencilerinin sosyal medya kullanımları ve siber zorbalık deneyimleri: Ankara örneği. Global Media Journal TR Edition, 5(10), 71-86.
  • Bauman, S., Toomey, R. B., & Walker, J. L. (2013). Associations among bullying, cyberbullying, and suicide in high school students. Journal of Adolescence, 36(2), 341-350.
  • Belsey, B. (2006). Cyberbullying: an emerging threat to the always on generation. http://www.billbelsey.com/?p=1827 sitesinden erişilmiştir.
  • Beran, T., & Li, Q. (2005). Cyber-harassment: A study of a new method for an old behavior. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 32(3), 265-277. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2190/8YQM-B04H-PG4D-BLLH.
  • Bhat, C. S. (2008). Cyber Bullying: Overview and strategies for school counsellors, guidance officers, and all school personnel. Australian Journal of Guidance and Counselling, 1(1), 53-66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1375/ajgc.18.1.53.
  • Biegler, S., & Boyd, D. (2010). Risky behaviors and online safety: A 2010 Literature Review. https://www.zephoria.org/files/2010SafetyLitReview.pdf sitesinden erişilmiştir.
  • Bourassa, C. A. (2012). Student cyberbullying: raising awareness for school counselors. (Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi). University of Wisconsin-Stout, Menomonie, ABD.
  • Campbell, M. A. (2005). Cyber bullying: An old problem in a new guise? Australian Journal of Guidance and Counselling, 15(1), 68-76. DOI:10.1375/ajgc.15.1.68.
  • Chapin, J. (2016). Adolescents and cyber bullying: The precaution adoption process model. Education and Information Technologies, 21(4), 719-728. DOI:10.1007/s10639-014-9349-1.
  • Dilmaç, B., Deniz, M. E., & Aydoğan, D. (2009). İlköğretim öğrencilerinde sosyal destek ve siber zorbalığın incelenmesi. 18. Ulusal Eğitim Bilimleri Kurultayı, 1-3 Ekim, (s. 1-4). İzmir. Erişim: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/315792444_Bilgisayar_Ve_Ogretim_Teknolojileri_Ogretmenligi_Bolumu_4_Sinif_Ogrencilerinin_Sanal_Zorbalik_Hakkindaki_Farkindalik_Durumlarinin_Farkli_Degiskenlerce_Incelenmesi.
  • Duff, P. A. (2008). Case study research in applied linguistic. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Erdur, B. Ö., & Kavsut, F. (2007). Akran Zorbalığının Yeni Yüzü:Siber Zorbalık. Eurasian Journal Of Educational Research, 27, 31-42. Erişim: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/324476306_Akran_Zorbaliginin_Yeni_Yuzu_Siber_Zorbalik_Cyber_Bullying_A_New_Face_of_Peer_Bullying/link/5acf21524585154f3f460942/download. Eroğlu, Y., & Güler, N. (2015). Koşullu öz-değer, riskli internet davranışları ve siber zorbalık/ mağduriyet ilişkinin incelenmesi. Sakarya University Journal of Education, 5(3), 118-129. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19126/suje.04882.
  • Festl, R. (2016). Perpetrators on the internet: Analyzing individual and structural explanation factors of cyberbullying in school context. Computers in Human Behavior(59), 237-248. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19148/ijhbs.365829.
  • Flannery, D. J., Wester, K. L., & Singer, M. I. (2004). Impact of exposure to violence in school on child and adolescent mental health and behavior. Journal of Community Psychology(32), 559-573. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.20019.
  • Gardner, M. C. (2010). Principals‟ perceptions of cyberbullying policies in selected Florida middle schools. (Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi). University of Central Florida College of Education, Florida.
  • Hays, P. A. (2004). Case study research. K. de Marrais ve S. D. Lapan (Yay. Haz.). Foundation for research: Methods of inquiry in education and the social sciences (s.218-234)Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Hinduja, S., & Patchin, J. (2008). Cyberbullying: An exploratory analysis of factors related to offending and victimization. Deviant Behavior(29), 129-156. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01639620701457816.
  • Hinduja, S., & Patchin, J. W. (2010). Bullying, Cyberbullying and Suicide. Archives of Suicide Research, 14(3), 206– 221. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13811118.2010.494133.
  • Hoover, J. H., Oliver, R., & Thomson, K. (1993). Perceived victimization by school bullies: New research and future directions. Journal of Humanistic Education and Development(32), 76-84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2164-4683.1993.tb00133.x.
  • Juvonen, J., & Gross, E. F. (2008). Extending the school grounds?—Bullying experiences in cyberspace. Journal of School Health, 78(9), 496-505. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1746-1561.2008.00335.x.
  • Karasar, N. (2015). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemi. İstanbul: Nobel Yayıncılık. Leung, A. N., Wong, N., & Farver, J. M. (2017). Cyberbullying in Hong Kong Chinese students: Life satisfaction, and the moderating role of friendship qualities on cyberbullying victimization and perpetration. Personality and Individual Differences(133), 7-12. DOI: DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.07.016
  • Li, Q. (2006). Cyberbullying in schools: A research of gender differences. School Pyschology International(27), 157-170. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0143034306064547.
  • Li, Q. (2007). Bullying in the new playground: Research into cyberbullying and cyber victimisation. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology(23), 435–454. Erişim: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/4903/48dcd182d2f3e9d59e5fa375f2aeb6482343.pdf.
  • Mark, L. K. (2009). Student, educator, and parent perceptions of cyber bullying in three Hawai’i middle schools. (Unpublished thesis). University of Hawai’i Educational Psychology, Hawai.
  • Mason, K. L. (2008). Cyberbullying: A preliminary assessment for school personnel. Psychology in the Schools, 45(4), 323-348. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20301. Merriam, S. B. (1988). Case study research in education: A qualitative approach San Fransisco, CA: Jossey –Bass.
  • METK (1973). 1739 Sayılı Milli eğitim temel kanunu. 24,06.1973 tarih ve 14574 sayılı Resmi Gazete
  • Mitchell, K.J., Ybarra, M..L., & Finkelhor, D. (2007). The relative ımportance of online victimization in understanding depression, delinquency, and substance use. Child Maltreatment, 12, 314-324
  • Paker, T. (2015). Durum çalışması. F. N. Seggie ve Y. Bayyurt. Nitel araştırma: yöntem, teknik, analiz ve yaklaşımlar. (s. 119-134). Ankara: Anı Yayıncılık
  • Patchin, J. W., & Hinduja, S. (2006). Bullies move beyond the schoolyard a preliminary look at cyberbullying. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 4(2), 148-169. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1541204006286288.
  • Price, M., & Dalgleish, J. (2010). Cyberbullying: Experiences, impacts and coping strategies as described by Australian young people. Youth Studies Australia, 29(2), 51-59. Erişim: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/284793882_Cyberbullying_Experiences_impacts_and_coping_strategies_as_described_by_Australian_young_people.
  • Santrock, J. W. (2012). Akranlar, romantik ilişkiler ve yaşam tarzı. d. m. siyez içinde, ergenlik (s. 204-329). Ankara: Nobel Yayınevi.
  • Schneider, S., O'Donnell, L., Stueve, A., & Coulter, R. S. (2012). Cyberbullying, school bullying, and psychological distress: A regional census of high school students. American Journal Of Public Health, 102(1), 171-177. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2011.300308.
  • Sezer, M., Şahin, I., & Aktürk, A. O. (2013). Cyber bullying victimization of elementary school students and their reflections on the victimization. International Journal of Social, Human Science and Engineering, 7(12), 1989-1992. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19148/ijhbs.365829.
  • Sleglova, V., & Cerna, A. (2011). Cyberbullying in adolescent victims: Perception and coping. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 5(2), 1-12. Erişim: https://cyberpsychology.eu/article/view/4248/3294.
  • Slojen, R., Smith, K. P., & Frisen, A. (2012). The nature of cyberbullying, and strategies for prevention, computers in human behavior. New York: Elsevier Ltd.
  • Sourander, A., Klomek, A. B., Ikonen, M., Lindroos, J., Luntamo, T., Koskelainen, M., Helenius, H. (2010). Psychosocial risk factors associated with cyberbullying among adolescents: A population-based study. Archives of General Psychiatr, 67(7), 720-728. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2010.79
  • Taştekin, E. (2016). Ergenlerin arkadaşlık ilişkileri ve benlik saygısı ile siber zorbalık ve siber mağduriyet arasındaki ilişkiler. (Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi). Hacettepe Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara.
  • Thomas, S. P. (2006). From the editor—the phenomenon of cyberbullying. Issues in Mental Health Nursing, 27(10), 1015-1016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01612840600943762.
  • Thompsen, P. A. (1996). What's fueling the flames in cyberspace: A social influence model. L. Strate, R. Jacobson, & S. B. Gibson içinde, Communication and cyberspace: Social interaction in an electronic environment (s. 297-315). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
  • Topcu, Ç., & Erdur-Baker, Ö. (2016). Zorbalığa uğrayan ergenlerin yardım alma davranışı ve yardım kaynakları. Ege Eğitim Dergisi, 17(1), 127-145. Erişim: https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/225063.
  • Vandebosch, H., & Cleemput, K. V. (2006). Cyberbullying among youngsters in Flanders. Erişim: http://www.oecdsbv. net/Templates/Article.aspx?id=379.
  • Willard, N. (2007). Educator’s guide to cyberbullying and cyberthreats. Erişim: http://cyber-safe-kids.com.
  • Willard, N. E. (2007). Cyberbullying and cyberthreats: Responding to the challenge of online social aggression, threats, and distress. US: Research Press.
  • Yaman, E. (2012). Ergenlerin siber zorbalık ve siber mağduriyete ilişkin algıları. Gaziantep Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 11(3), 819-833. Erişim: https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/223319.
  • Yaman, E. ve Peker, A. (2012). Ergenlerin siber zorbalık ve siber mağduriyete ilişkin algıları. Gaziantep Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi. 11(3):819 -833 (http://sbe.gantep.edu.tr)
  • Ybarra, M. L., & Mitchell, K. J. (2004). Online aggressor/targets, aggressors, and targets: A comparison of associated youth characteristics. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 45(7), 1308-1316. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2004.00328.x.
  • Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2008). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.
  • Yılmaz, H. (2011). Cyberbullying in Turkish middle schools: An exploratory study. School Psychology International, 32(6), 645-654. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0143034311410262
  • Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
There are 55 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Subjects Studies on Education
Journal Section Issue Articles
Authors

Kemal Kayıkçı 0000-0003-3330-5452

Pınar Bayram 0000-0002-5165-7841

Project Number YLOK
Publication Date December 31, 2021
Published in Issue Year 2021Volume: 12 Issue: 5

Cite

APA Kayıkçı, K., & Bayram, P. (2021). Ortaokul Öğrencileri Arasında Siber Zorbalık / Cyber Bullying Among Secondary School Students. E-Uluslararası Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 12(5), 255-272. https://doi.org/10.19160/e-ijer.1025560
 Download Cover Image

Creative Commons Lisansı
This journal uses a CC BY-NC-SA license.


[email protected]                http://www.e-ijer.com    Address: Ege University Faculty of Education İzmir/Türkiye