Araştırma Makalesi

Examination of Teacher Candidates' Opinions on the Double Major Program by the Learning Process Model / Öğretmen Adaylarının Çift Anadal Programına İlişkin Görüşlerinin Öğrenme Süreç Modeli İle İncelenmesi

Cilt: 13 Sayı: 6 30 Aralık 2022
PDF İndir
TR EN

Examination of Teacher Candidates' Opinions on the Double Major Program by the Learning Process Model / Öğretmen Adaylarının Çift Anadal Programına İlişkin Görüşlerinin Öğrenme Süreç Modeli İle İncelenmesi

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to determine the views of teacher candidates on the Double Major Program by the learning process model. While examining the views of teacher candidates with the learning process model, six stages of the model were taken into account such as unaware of the model, awareness, understanding, commitment, practice and reflection. The study group of the research based on the phenomenology design consists of 35 teacher candidates studying at the Faculty of Education in Siirt University. In the study, in which an open-ended questionnaire form was used, the data were analyzed through a qualitative program. Content analysis method was used in the analysis. As a result of the research; It was observed that the participants of the Double Major Program expressed their opinions by using the learning process model stages. It has been concluded that the participants with these views do not have knowledge about the Double Major Program and do not seem willing to learn about the different departments. Afterwards, they stated that their awareness improved when they enrolled in the Double Major Program and they were willing to learn. At the same time, the participants questioned the course contents of other departments with a sense of curiosity and discovery and explained the opportunities provided by the two diplomas. Participants who approached the Double Major Program from a positive point of view, on the other hand, mentioned the negative aspects of the evaluation process. In the last step of the learning process model, they emphasized contributions of self-evaluation in evaluation more. In general, if the results are summarized, the participants do not have the readiness for the Double Major Program at the stage of ignorance of the learning process model. The participants see that there is a diversity due to the course contents in the program at the stage of awareness. The participants approach the program from a multidimensional perspective at the stage of understanding. In the stage of commitment, the participants talk about the difficulties of process and outcome evaluation. During the stage of enactment, they talk about the benefits of being educated in different departments and evaluate themselves on time management. At this stage, especially the participants critically approach the positive and negative aspects of themselves by using their introspective intelligence. At the stage of reflection, the participants refer to the measurement and evaluation possibilities.

Keywords

Kaynakça

  1. Alavi, M., & Leidner, D.E. (2001). Knowledge management and knowledge management systems: conceptual foundations and research ıssues. MIS Quarterly, 25, 107-136. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3250961.
  2. Bader, J. (2016). Team autonomy and team effectiveness in an organizational context: The mediating role of team learning behaviours. (https://estudogeral.uc.pt/ bits tream/10316/81461/1/ Bader_thesis_final.pdf adresinden 04.03.2022 tarihinde indirilmiştir)
  3. Brownell, J. (2008). Exploring the strategic ground for listening and organizational effectiveness. Scandinavian Journal of Hospitality and Tourism, 8(3), 211-229. doi: 10.1080/15022250802305295
  4. Buckler, B. (1996). A learning process model to achieve continuous improvement and innovation. The Learning Organization, 3(3), 31-39.
  5. Del Rossi, A.F. & ve Hersch, J. (2016). The private and social benefits of double majors. J. Benefit Cost Anal. 2016; 7(2):292–325
  6. Gil, A. J., & Mataveli, M. (2018). Project management and learning: the learning project. Human capital and competences in project management. Intechopen, London, 45-69. https://www.siirt.edu.tr/duyuru/egitim-fakultesi-cift-anadal-basvuruislemleri/696957943.html adresinden 12.03.2022 tarihinde ulaşılmıştır.
  7. Hopcan, S., Polat, E. ve Adıgüzel, T. (2014). Çift anadal programında okuyan öğrencilerin görüşleri: bir değerlendirme çalışması. Hasan Ali Yücel Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 11(22), 287-299.
  8. Koçak, A. ve Arun, Ö. (2013). İçerik analizi çalışmalarında örneklem sorunu. Selçuk İletişim, 4 (3) , 21-28.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

Eğitim Üzerine Çalışmalar

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yayımlanma Tarihi

30 Aralık 2022

Gönderilme Tarihi

18 Ekim 2022

Kabul Tarihi

23 Aralık 2022

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2022 Cilt: 13 Sayı: 6

Kaynak Göster

APA
Koç Akran, S. (2022). Examination of Teacher Candidates’ Opinions on the Double Major Program by the Learning Process Model / Öğretmen Adaylarının Çift Anadal Programına İlişkin Görüşlerinin Öğrenme Süreç Modeli İle İncelenmesi. e-Uluslararası Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 13(6), 156-172. https://doi.org/10.19160/e-ijer.1190947

This journal uses a CC BY-NC-SA license.
 

[email protected]        http://www.e-ijer.com       

Posta Adres: Erzene Mahallesi, İstanbul Caddesi, Ege Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi, 35040, Bornova/İzmir