Participatory Action Research for Professional Development / Mesleki Gelişim İçin Katılımcı Eylem Araştırması

Şükran Tok; Sevda Dolapçıoğlu; Sabire Pınar Acar

doi:10.19160/e-ijer.1590067

TR EN

Mesleki Gelişim İçin Katılımcı Eylem Araştırması / Participatory Action Research for Professional Development

Öz

Covid-19 Pandemi dönemiçevrimiçi eğitime ani geçiş, öğretmenler arasında belirsizlik ve strese neden olmuştur. Bu çalışma, pandemi kaynaklı kaos dönemlerinde öğretmenlerin mesleki gelişimlerini desteklemede Katılımcı Eylem Araştırması [PAR]'nın rolünü ve PAR'ın ortaya çıkan zorluklarla başa çıkmada ne kadar etkili olduğunu incelemiştir. Çalışmaya Türkiye'deki bir devlet üniversitesinde yabancı diller yüksekokulunda çalışanon dört İngilizce öğretmeni ve 267 öğrenci katılmıştır. Üç PAR döngüsü boyunca yeni kurulan İngilizce hazırlık okuluna mesleki gelişim desteği sağlanmıştır. Veriler gözlemler, yansıtmalar ve görüşmeler yoluyla toplanmıştır. Nitel bulgular, PAR'ın öğretmenlerin mesleki gelişimine ve sınıf içi uygulamalarına katkıda bulunduğunu ortaya koymuştur. Pandeminin neden olduğu kaotik ortam ve o dönemde teknoloji tabanlı öğretim araçlarının zorunlu olarak uygulanması, mevcut çalışmanın yapıldığı dönemdeki temel zorluklardı. Bu zorluklar doğrudan öğrencinin derse katılımını azaltmıştır. Ancak PAR'ın uygulanması üzerine ortaya çıkan temaların analizi, katılımcı öğretmenlerin bu tür eylem araştırmalarını sınıf içi uygulamalarının gelişimi üzerinde önemli bir etkiye sahip araştırma türü olarak gördüklerini göstermiştir. Derslerde öğrenci katılımının artması ve teknoloji tabanlı öğretim kaynaklarının etkili kullanımı bu katkının sonuçlarıdır. Bu, PAR'ın sürecin başında yürütülen ihtiyaç analizinde bulunan sorunları önemli ölçüde ele aldığını göstermiştir. Dahası, araştırma, işbirliği ve yansıtma bileşenleri aracılığıyla PAR, öğretmenlerin bu sorun alanlarını ele almalarına önemli ölçüde destek olmuştur. Başlıca sorun alanları pandemi kaynaklı kaos ortamı ve o dönemde zorunlu olan teknoloji tabanlı öğretim araçlarının uygulanması olmuştur. Bu iki sorun doğrudan öğrencilerin derse katılım oranını düşürmüştür.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Participatory Action Research for Professional Development / Mesleki Gelişim İçin Katılımcı Eylem Araştırması

Abstract

The sudden shift to online education during the Covid-19 Pandemic resulted in uncertainty and stress among teachers. This study investigates the role of Participatory Action Research [PAR] in supporting teachers’ professional development in times of pandemic-induced chaos and how effective PAR is in tackling challenges that emerge. The study involved fourteen in-service teachers of English and 267 students at a Turkish state university. Through three cycles of PAR, professional development support was provided for the newly established English preparatory school. Data were collected through observations, reflections, and interviews. The qualitative findings revealed that PAR contributed to teachers’ professional development and in-class practices. The chaotic environment which was caused by the pandemic and the mandatory implementation of technology-based teaching tools during that period were the primary challenges at the time of current study. These challenges directly reduced student participation. However, upon the implementation of PAR, the analysis of the emerging themes showed that the participant teachers regarded this kind of action research as the greatest impact on their in-class practices. Increased student participation in classes and the efficient use of technology-based teaching resources were the results of this contribution. This indicated that PAR significantly addressed the issues found in the needs analysis conducted at the beginning of the process. Furthermore, through its components of research, collaboration, and reflection, PAR significantly supported teachers in addressing these problem areas. The major problem areas were the chaos environment caused by the pandemic and the implementation of technology-based teaching tools, which was mandatory during that period. These two problems directly decreased the rate of student participation in the lesson.

Keywords

Destekleyen Kurum

Yoktur

Etik Beyan

For this research, ethical permission was obtained from the decisions of İzmir Demokrasi University Social and Human Sciences Scientific Research and Publication Ethics Board dated 07.12.2020 and numbered 12-09.

Teşekkür

Yoktur

Kaynakça

Dolapçıoğlu, (2019). In action research: Method, approach, models and planning. In A.S. Saracaloğlu and A. K. Eranıl, (Eds.), Eğitimde Eylem Araştırmaları. Ankara: Nobel Yayıncılık, 279-310.
Ayaya, G. I., Makoelle, T. M., & Van Der Merwe, M. (2020). Participatory action research: A tool for enhancing inclusive teaching practices among teachers in South African Full-Service Schools. SAGE Open, 10(4), 215824402096357. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020963576
Balushi, K. A. (2021). Effectiveness of TESOL Teachers Continuous Professional Development: Perspectives form Oman. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 12(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.12n.1.p.1
Bayram, İ., & Canaran, Ö. (2018). Reflections on a teacher-led CPD Model for EFL Teachers. DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals). Retrieved from https://doaj.org/article/fce1a94b96574040b1bdc104675cc24b
Bhatt, S. P. (2021). Self-directed professional development: EFL teachers' understanding. International Journal of Language and Literary Studies, 3(4), 196-208. https://doi.org/10.36892/ijlls.v3i4.737
Borg, S. (2015). Overview-Beyond the workshop: CPD for English Language Teachers. Professional development for English language teachers. In: S. Borg, (Ed.) Perspectives from Higher Education in Turkey. Ankara: British Council, 5-12.
Borko, H., Jacobs, J., & Koellner, K. (2010). Contemporary approaches to teacher professional development. In Elsevier eBooks (pp. 548–556). https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-08-044894-7.00654-0 Burns, A. (2009). Doing Action Research in English Language Teaching: A guide for Practitioners. Retrieved from http://ci.nii.ac.jp/ncid/BB00607562
Cain, T. (2012). Too hard, too soft or just about right: paradigms in music teachers’ action research. British Journal of Music Education, 29(3), 409–425. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0265051712000290

Chevalier, J. M., & Buckles, D. J. (2019). Participatory Action Research: Theory and Methods for Engaged Inquiry. Routledge.
Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research. Pearson Education.
Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E. and Gardner, M. (2017). Effective Teacher Professional Development. Palo Alto, CA: Learning Policy Institute.
Day, C. (1999). Developing Teachers: The Challenges of Lifelong Learning (Educational Change and Development Series). Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED434878.pdf
Dhanavel, S. P. (Ed.) (2022). Continuing Professional Development of English Language Teachers: Perspectives and Practices from India. Singapore: Springer
Eroglu, M., & Özbek, R. (2023). Examining Teachers' Participation in Professional Development in Terms of Their Demographic Characteristics. Excellence in Education Journal, 12(1), 55-81. Farrell, T. S. C. (2013). Reflective practice in ESL Teacher Development Groups: From Practices to Principles. Retrieved from http://ci.nii.ac.jp/ncid/BB16377155
Geldenhuys, J., & Oosthuizen, L. C. (2015). Challenges influencing teachers’ involvement in continuous professional development: A South African perspective. Teaching and Teacher Education, 51, 203–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2015.06.010
Hodges, C. B., Moore, S., Lockee, B. B., Trust, T., & Bond, M. A. (2020). The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning. Educational Review. Retrieved from https://vtechworks.lib.vt.edu/handle/10919/104648
Huhtala, A., & Vesalainen, M. (2017). Challenges in developing in-service teacher training: Lessons learnt from two projects for teachers of Swedish in Finland. Apples: Journal of Applied Language Studies, 11.
Ioannidou-Koutselini, M., & Patsalidou, F. (2015). Engaging school teachers and school principals in an action research in-service development as a means of pedagogical self-awareness. Educational Action Research, 23(2), 124-139.
Kemmis, S. (2010). What is to be done? The place of action research. Educational Action Research, 18(4), 417–427. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2010.524745
Kemmis, S. & McTaggart, R. (2000). Participatory action research. In: N. Denzin and Y. Lincoln (Eds). The Handbook of Qualitative Research. India: Sage, 567–607.
Kemmis, S., McTaggart, R., & Nixon, R. (2013). The Action Research Planner: Doing Critical Participatory Action Research. Retrieved from https://ndl.ethernet.edu.et/bitstream/123456789/88583/1/2014_Book_TheActionResearchPlanner.pdf
Kennedy, A. (2011). Collaborative continuing professional development (CPD) for teachers in Scotland: aspirations, opportunities and barriers. European Journal of Teacher Education, 34(1), 25–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2010.534980
Kindon, S., Pain, R., & Kesby, M. (2007). Participatory Action Research Approaches and methods: Connecting People, Participation and Place. Routledge.
Koç, E. M. (2016). A general investigation of the In-Service training of English language teachers at elementary schools in Turkey. DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals). Retrieved from https://doaj.org/article/13d7a2e43b424abba47cae87596881af Lambirth, A., Cabral, A., McDonald, R., Philpott, C., Brett, A., & Magaji, A. (2019). Teacher-led professional development through a model of action research, collaboration and facilitation. Professional Development in Education, 47(5), 815–833. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2019.1685565
Laudonia, I., & Eilks, I. (2018). Reflections on a Three-Year-Long Teacher-Centered, participatory Action research experience on teaching chemical bonding in a Swiss vocational school. Education Sciences, 8(3), 141-156. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci8030141
Liu, K., Miller, R. I., & Jahng, K. E. (2016). Participatory media for teacher professional development: toward a self-sustainable and democratic community of practice. Educational Review, 68(4), 420–443. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2015.1121862
Mercer, S., Farrell, C. & Freeman, D. (2022). Self-directed Professional Development in ELT. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Miedijensky, S., & Sasson, I. (2020). Participatory action research as a way to innovate mathematics and science teaching, teachers’ professional development perceptions and performances. Educational Action Research, 30(1), 39–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2020.1802320
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. SAGE.
Morales, M. P. E. (2015). Participatory Action Research (PAR) cum Action Research (AR) in Teacher Professional Development: A Literature Review. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 2(1), 156-165. https://doi.org/10.21890/ijres.01395
Mustafa, B., & Paçariz, Y. (2021). Exploring teachers’ perceptions of professional development: The case of Kosova. The Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 17(3), 1210–1224. https://doi.org/10.52462/jlls.86
Nugent, K. L. (2019). Exploring the teaching of culture in the foreign language classroom within the context of collaborative professional development: a critical participatory action research study. Educational Action Research, 28(3), 497–517. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2019.1577148
Opfer, D. D., & Pedder, D. (2010). Benefits, status and effectiveness of Continuous Professional Development for teachers in England. the Curriculum Journal, 21(4), 413–431. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585176.2010.529651
Ördem, E. (2021). Participatory action research in a listening-speaking class in second language teaching: towards a critical syllabus. Educational Action Research, 31(1), 4–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2021.1898431
Padwad, A. (2022). Continuing Professional Development and Culture: Developing as an English Teacher in India. In Continuing professional development of English language teachers: perspectives and practices from India (pp. 19–36). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-5069-8_2
Parrello, S., Iorio, I., Carillo, F., & Moreno, C. (2019). Teaching in the Suburbs: participatory action research against educational wastage. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 2308.
Pineda, H., Lorca, A., Cortes, S., Gador, S., Mangompit, R. M., Pacaldo, F. J., & Lorca, E. (2022). Development and Evaluation of a Professional Development Program on Designing Participatory Action Research Projects for Basic Education Teachers. Advanced Education, 21, 161-184. https://doi.org/10.20535/2410-8286.266663
Reimers, F. M., & Schleicher, A. (2020). A framework to guide an education response to the COVID-19 Pandemic of 2020. OECD. Retrieved April, 14(2020), 2020-04.
Richards, J. C., & Farrell, T. S. C. (2005). Professional Development for Language Teachers: Strategies for Teacher learning. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511667237
Saberi, L., & Amiri, F. (2016). A Qualitative Study of Iranian EFL University Teachers’ Attitude towards Professional Development. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 7(3), 591-598. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.0703.22
Sagor, R. (2010). The Action Research Guidebook: A Four-Stage Process for Educators and School Teams. Corwin Press. Saldaña, J., & Omasta, M. (2016). Qualitative research: Analyzing life. Sage Publications.
Sokal, L., Trudel, L. G. E., & Babb, J. (2020). Supporting Teachers in Times of Change: The Job Demands- Resources Model and Teacher Burnout during the COVID-19 Pandemic. International Journal of Contemporary Education, 3(2), 67. https://doi.org/10.11114/ijce.v3i2.4931
Somantri, C., & Iskandar, H. (2021). The impact of CPD in teaching, and the role of principal in promoting CPD. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research/Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.210212.074
Stringer, E. T. (2014). Action research. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications.
Toprakçı, E. ve Hepsöğütlü, Z. B. (2022). Anadolu lisesi öğretmenlerinin uzaktan öğretime ilişkin sorun kaynağı algıları. Uluslararası Liderlik Eğitimi Dergisi (ULED)/ International Journal of Leadership Training (IJOLT), 6(2), 1-14. TrDoi: https://trdoi.org/10.26023458/uled.1166943
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (2020). COVID-19 Impact on Education. https://en.unesco.org/covid19/educationresponse Uztosun, M. S., Skinner, N., & Cadorath, J. (2014). An action research study designed to implement student negotiation to improve speaking classroom practice in Turkey. Educational Action Research, 22(4), 488–504. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2014.904238

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

Öğretmen Eğitimi ve Eğitimcilerin Mesleki Gelişimi

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yazarlar

Şükran Tok
0000-0002-8387-615X
Türkiye

Sevda Dolapçıoğlu ^*
0000-0002-2707-1744
Türkiye

Sabire Pınar Acar
0000-0002-7463-1951
Türkiye

Yayımlanma Tarihi

27 Aralık 2024

Gönderilme Tarihi

23 Kasım 2024

Kabul Tarihi

26 Aralık 2024

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2024 Cilt: 15 Sayı: 2

DOI

https://doi.org/10.19160/e-ijer.1590067

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA86DE46MA

Kaynak Göster

RIS / Bibtex

APA

Tok, Ş., Dolapçıoğlu, S., & Acar, S. P. (2024). Participatory Action Research for Professional Development / Mesleki Gelişim İçin Katılımcı Eylem Araştırması. e-Uluslararası Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 15(2), 145-161. https://doi.org/10.19160/e-ijer.1590067