Redirecting to http://dergipark.org.tr/_fragment?_hash=7tpZ9hA1cmCdWgsV8H3puTPZO0CdJ5n03p2jXrIHKRs&_path=id%3D1038386%26_format%3Dhtml%26_locale%3Dtr%26_controller%3DApp%255CController%255CSite%255CArticleController%253A%253AesiArticleStats.
Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Okul Yöneticilerinin Katılımcı Karar Verme Sürecine Yönelik Algılarının İncelenmesi / Exploring School Administrators' Perceptions on Participative Decision Making Process

Yıl 2022, Cilt: 13 Sayı: 1, 118 - 140, 28.02.2022

Muammer Maral

https://doi.org/10.19160/e-ijer.1038386

Öz

Bu araştırmanın amacı, eğitim örgütleri olan okullarda katılımcı karar verme sürecine yönelik okul yöneticilerinin algılarını incelemektir. Araştırmanın yöntemi, nitel araştırma desenlerinden olan temel nitel araştırma desenidir. Araştırmanın çalışma grubu, ölçüt örnekleme ve maksimum çeşitlilik örneklemesi yöntemleri ile belirlenmiştir. Araştırmanın çalışma grubunu resmi okul öncesi, ilkokul, ortaokul ve liselerde görev yapan 30 okul yöneticisi oluşturmaktadır. Araştırma verilerinin toplanmasında yarı yapılandırılmış görüşme formu kullanılmıştır ve veriler içerik analizi yöntemiyle analiz edilmiştir. Araştırmanın sonuçlarına göre karar verme sürecinde yöneticilerin tutumu, değişen durumlara göre farklılaşmaktadır. Öğretmenler bazı durumlarda karar verme sürecine dahil edilirken bazı durumlarda bu sürecin dışında bırakılmaktadır. Kararlar tek bir ortamda alınmamakta, kararların alındığı ortamlar çeşitlilik göstermektedir. Öğretmenlerin karar verme sürecine dahil edilmesine neden olan birçok faktör vardır. Bunlardan en çok ifade edileni, farklı fikirlerin değerlendirilmesi gerektiğidir. Öğretmenlerin karar verme sürecine yönelik istekli ve isteksiz olduğu durumlar çeşitlilik göstermektedir. Yönetici görüşlerine göre öğretmenlere fazladan iş yükü doğuracak durumlarda karar verme sürecine katılımda isteksizlik göstermekte ancak bireye menfaat sağlayan durumlarda istekli olmaktadırlar. Karar verme sürecinde yöneticiler tarafından yapılan birçok hata bulunmaktadır. Bunlardan en çok ifade edileni yöneticilerin tek başına karar verme eğilimidir. Okul yöneticilerinden karar verme sürecinde beklenen bazı roller bulunmaktadır. Buna yönelik katılımcılar tarafından en fazla ifade edilen kod, yöneticilerin katılımcı karar alma sürecini desteklemeleri gerektiğidir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Eğitim Eğitim yönetimi Okul yöneticileri Karar verme Katılımcı karar verme.

Kaynakça

  • Abelson, R. P. (1985). Decision making and decision T. G. Lindzey, & E. Aronson (Eds.), The Handbook of social psychology (pp. 231-309). Addison-Wesley.
  • Aydın, M. (1994). Eğitim yönetimi. Hatiboğlu Yayınları.
  • Babaoğlan, E. & Yılmaz, F. (2012). İlköğretim okullarında karara katılma. Mersin Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 8 (3), 1-12.
  • Balyer, A., Ozcan, K., & Yildiz, A. (2017). Teacher empowerment: School administrators’ roles. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 17(70), 1-18.
  • Bagarette, N. (2011). Power Relation in School Governing Bodies: Implications for Effective School Governance. Journal of Social Science 29 (3), 223–236.
  • Baloğlu, N. (2014). Karar verme. S. Turan (Eds.), Eğitim yönerimi, teori, araştırma ve uygulama (pp. 226-249). Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
  • Barrera-Osorio, F.B., Fasih, T. &Patrinos, H.A. (2009). Decentralized Decision-making in Schools: The Theory and Evidence on School-based Management. World Bank.
  • Baruth, G. (2013). Exploring the experiences and challenges faced by school governing bodies in secondary schools in the province of Kwazulu-Natal. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of South Africa.
  • Beytekin, O. F., & Kılıç, F. (2021). İlkokul Müdürlerinin Karar Verme Sürecini Etkileyen Faktörler. E-Uluslararası Pedandragoji Dergisi, 1(1), 37–54. DOI: https://trdoi.org/10.27579808/e-ijpa.19
  • Bursalıoğlu, Z. (2013). Okul yönetiminde yeni yapı ve davranış. Pegem Akademi.
  • Can, E., & Serençelik, G. (2017). Okul öncesi eğitim öğretmenlerinin okul yönetimine katılımlarının incelenmesi. Dicle Üniversitesi Ziya Gökalp Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, (30), 525-542. https://doi.org/10.14582/DUZGEF.791
  • Ceballos López, N., & Saiz Linares, Á. (2019). Promoviendo la participación del alumnado en la escuela. Análisis de materiales y guías internacionales para docentes que desarrollan experiencias de voz del alumnado. Profesorado. Revista de Currículum y Formación de Profesorado, 23(1), 329-350. DOI:10.30827/profesorado.v23i1.9157
  • Cheung, F. W., & Cheng, Y. C. (2002). An outlier study of multilevel self-management and school performance. School Effectiveness & School Improvement, 13(3), 253-290.
  • Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative. Pearson.
  • Crowson, R. L.,& Porter-Gehrie, C. (1980). The discretionary behavior of principals in large-city schools. Educational Administration Quarterly, 16(1), 45–69. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X8001600106
  • Daryadi, H., Komariah, A., & Permana, J. (2018). Impact of authentic leadership and teacher participation in decision-making on school performance. In Educational Administration Innovation for Sustainable Development (pp. 31-36). CRC Press.
  • Davis, S. H. (2004). The myth of the rational decision maker: A framework for applying and enhancing heuristic and intuitive decision-making by school leaders. Journal of School Leadership, 14(6), 621-652.
  • DeMatthews, D. (2014). Shared decision-making: What principals need to know. Principal Matters, (100), 2-4.
  • Dönmez, B., Uğurlu, C. T., & Cömert, M. (2011). Gevşek yapılı sistemler olarak ilköğretim okullarında nitel bir araştırma. Uludağ Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 24 (1), 1-29.
  • Eren, E. (2019). Yönetim ve organizasyon (Çağdaş ve küresel yaklaşımlar). Beta Basım Yayım Dağıtım.
  • Eriş, H., Kayhan, H., Baştaş, M., & Gamar, C. (2017). Teacher and administrative staff views on teachers’ participation in decision making process. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(11), 7411-7420.
  • Güçlü, N., Özer, A., Kurt, T., & Koşar, S. (2015). Liderlik stilleri, karar verme stratejileri ve kişiliğin okullardaki karar sürecine etkilerinin çok düzeyli analizi. International Journal of Human Sciences, 12 (2), 1756-1791.
  • Hammad, W. (2010). Teachers’ perceptions of school culture as a barrier to shared decision‐making (SDM) in Egypt’s secondary schools. Compare, 40(1), 97-110.
  • Hardman, D., & Harries, C. (2002). How rational are we? The Psychologist, 15(2), 76–79.
  • Heller, F. A. (1992). Decision making and leadership. Camridge University Press.
  • Heystek, J.(2010). School governing bodies in South African schools: Under pressure to enhance democratisation andimprove quality. South African Journal of Education 39 (4): 455–468.
  • Honingh, M., & Hooge, E. (2013). The effect of school-leader support and participation in decision making on teacher collaboration in Dutch primary and secondary schools. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 42 (1), 75-98. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143213499256.
  • Hoy, W. K., & Miskel, C. G. (2004). Educational administration: Theory, research, and practice. McGraw-Hill International Edition.
  • Hoy, W. K., & Tarter, C. J. (2003). Administrators solving the problems of practice: Decision-making ceoncepts, cases, and consequences. Allyn and Bacon.
  • Johnson, S. M.,& Boles, K. C. (1994). The role of teachers in school reform. S. A. Mohrman, & P. Wohlstetter (Eds.), School-based management: Organizing for high performance(pp. 109-137). Jossey-Bass.
  • Lindelow, J.,& Heynderickx, J. (1990). Participative decision-making. S. C. Smith, & P. K. Piele (Eds.), School leadership: Handbook for excellence(pp. 109-134). ERIC Clearinghouse Educational Management.
  • Lunenburg, F. C., & Ornstein, A. (2011). Educational administration: Concepts and practices. Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
  • Mager, U., & Nowak, P. (2012). Effects of student participation in decision making at school. A systematic review and synthesis of empirical research. Educational Research Review, 7(1), 38-61.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2011.11.001
  • Manasse, A. L. (1985). Improving conditions for principal effectiveness: Policy implications of research. Elementary School Journal, 85(3), 349-463.
  • March, J. G. (1994). Primer on decision making: How decisions happen. The Free Press.
  • March, J. G., & Simon, H. A. (1958). Organizations. John Wiley & Sons.
  • Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. Jossey-Bass.
  • Mokoena, S., & Machaisa, R. (2018). More heads are better than one: School-based decision-making in varied school environments. Africa Education Review, 15(1), 138-156.
  • Ölçüm, D. (2015). Okul yöneticilerinin karar verme stillerinin öğretmenlerin iş doyumuna etkisi.(Unpublished Master's Thesis). Sakarya University.
  • Pashiardis, P. (1994). Teacher participation in decision making. International Journal of Educational Management, 8(5), 14-17.
  • Richardson, V.,& Placier, P. (2001). Teacher change. American Educational Research Association.
  • Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2017). Organizational behavior. Pearson.
  • Sarafidou, J. O., & Chatziioannidis, G. (2013). Teacher participation in decision making and its impact on school and teachers. International Journal of Educational Management, 27(2), 170-183.
  • Sezer, Ş. (2016). Okul müdürlerinin görev öncelikleri ve karar alma süreçlerini etkileyen faktörlere ilişkin görüşleri. İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 17(3), 121-137. https://doi:10.17679/iuefd.17311445
  • Shaked, H.,& Schechter, C. (2019). Exploring systems thinking in school principals ‘decision-making. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 22(5), 573-596.
  • Simon, H. A. (1986). Rationality in psychology and economics. Journal of Business, 59(4), 209-224.
  • Smit, M.H., & Oosthuizen, I.J. (2011). Improving school governance through participative democracy and the law. South African Journal of Education, 31, 55-73.
  • Smylie, M. A. (1992). Teacher participation in school decision making: Assessing willingness to participate. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 14 (1), 53-67.
  • Somech, A. (2010). Participative decision making in schools: A mediating-moderating analytical framework for understanding school and teacher outcomes. Educational Administration Quarterly 46 (2): 174-209.
  • Sukirno, D. S., & Siengthai, S. (2011). Does participative decision making affect lecturer performance in higher education? International Journal of Educational Management, 25 (5), 494-508.
  • Türk, Ö., & Tulunay Ateş, Ö. (2019, Mayıs). Okul müdürlerinin okulda karar verme hakkında görüşlerinin değerlendirilmesi. 14. Uluslararası Eğitim Yönetimi Kongresi, 203-213. İzmir.http://eyk14.eyedder.org.tr/tr/anasayfa/
  • Üzüm, H., & Kurt, T. (2019). Okullarda katılımcı karar verme sürecinin incelenmesi. Eğitim ve Toplum Araştırmaları Dergisi, 6 (1), 95-112.
  • Wadesango, N. (2012). The influence of teacher participation in Decision-Making on student Performance. The Anthropologist, 14(5), 425-431.
  • Wan, E. (2005). Teacher empowerment: Concepts, strategies, and implications for schools in Hong Kong. Teachers College Record, 107 (4), 842-861.
  • Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2013). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri. Seçkin Yayıncılık.

Exploring School Administrators' Perceptions on Participative Decision Making Process / Okul Yöneticilerinin Katılımcı Karar Verme Sürecine Yönelik Algılarının İncelenmesi

Yıl 2022, Cilt: 13 Sayı: 1, 118 - 140, 28.02.2022

Muammer Maral

https://doi.org/10.19160/e-ijer.1038386

Öz

This study aims to investigate school administrators' perceptions on the participatory decision-making process at schools as educational institutions. The method adopted in the research is basic qualitative research design, which is one of the qualitative research designs. Criterion sampling methods and maximum variation sampling methods have been used in the determination of the study group. The study group consists of 30 school administrators from various public preschool institutions, primary schools, elementary schools, and high schools. The study employed semi-structured interview forms in data collection, and the data were analyzed by content analysis method. According to the results of the research, the attitude of managers in the decision-making process differs according to changing conditions. In some cases, teachers are included in the decision-making process, while in others, they are excluded. Decisions are not made in a particular setting. Instead, there is a variety of settings used for this purpose. There are many factors that cause teachers to be included in the decision-making process. The most expressed one of these is that different ideas should be evaluated. Situations where teachers are willing and unwilling to the decision-making process are diverse. According to school administrator's, teachers are reluctant to participate in decisions that will bring extra workload to them. On the contrary, they participate in the process willingly when personal interests are at stake. There are many mistakes made by administrators in the decision-making process. The most common one of these is the tendency of administrators to make decisions alone. There are some expected roles in the process of deciding from school administrators. The most stated code by participants is that managers should support the participatory decision-making process.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Education Educational administration School administrations Decision-making Participative decision-making.

Kaynakça

  • Abelson, R. P. (1985). Decision making and decision T. G. Lindzey, & E. Aronson (Eds.), The Handbook of social psychology (pp. 231-309). Addison-Wesley.
  • Aydın, M. (1994). Eğitim yönetimi. Hatiboğlu Yayınları.
  • Babaoğlan, E. & Yılmaz, F. (2012). İlköğretim okullarında karara katılma. Mersin Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 8 (3), 1-12.
  • Balyer, A., Ozcan, K., & Yildiz, A. (2017). Teacher empowerment: School administrators’ roles. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 17(70), 1-18.
  • Bagarette, N. (2011). Power Relation in School Governing Bodies: Implications for Effective School Governance. Journal of Social Science 29 (3), 223–236.
  • Baloğlu, N. (2014). Karar verme. S. Turan (Eds.), Eğitim yönerimi, teori, araştırma ve uygulama (pp. 226-249). Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
  • Barrera-Osorio, F.B., Fasih, T. &Patrinos, H.A. (2009). Decentralized Decision-making in Schools: The Theory and Evidence on School-based Management. World Bank.
  • Baruth, G. (2013). Exploring the experiences and challenges faced by school governing bodies in secondary schools in the province of Kwazulu-Natal. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of South Africa.
  • Beytekin, O. F., & Kılıç, F. (2021). İlkokul Müdürlerinin Karar Verme Sürecini Etkileyen Faktörler. E-Uluslararası Pedandragoji Dergisi, 1(1), 37–54. DOI: https://trdoi.org/10.27579808/e-ijpa.19
  • Bursalıoğlu, Z. (2013). Okul yönetiminde yeni yapı ve davranış. Pegem Akademi.
  • Can, E., & Serençelik, G. (2017). Okul öncesi eğitim öğretmenlerinin okul yönetimine katılımlarının incelenmesi. Dicle Üniversitesi Ziya Gökalp Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, (30), 525-542. https://doi.org/10.14582/DUZGEF.791
  • Ceballos López, N., & Saiz Linares, Á. (2019). Promoviendo la participación del alumnado en la escuela. Análisis de materiales y guías internacionales para docentes que desarrollan experiencias de voz del alumnado. Profesorado. Revista de Currículum y Formación de Profesorado, 23(1), 329-350. DOI:10.30827/profesorado.v23i1.9157
  • Cheung, F. W., & Cheng, Y. C. (2002). An outlier study of multilevel self-management and school performance. School Effectiveness & School Improvement, 13(3), 253-290.
  • Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative. Pearson.
  • Crowson, R. L.,& Porter-Gehrie, C. (1980). The discretionary behavior of principals in large-city schools. Educational Administration Quarterly, 16(1), 45–69. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X8001600106
  • Daryadi, H., Komariah, A., & Permana, J. (2018). Impact of authentic leadership and teacher participation in decision-making on school performance. In Educational Administration Innovation for Sustainable Development (pp. 31-36). CRC Press.
  • Davis, S. H. (2004). The myth of the rational decision maker: A framework for applying and enhancing heuristic and intuitive decision-making by school leaders. Journal of School Leadership, 14(6), 621-652.
  • DeMatthews, D. (2014). Shared decision-making: What principals need to know. Principal Matters, (100), 2-4.
  • Dönmez, B., Uğurlu, C. T., & Cömert, M. (2011). Gevşek yapılı sistemler olarak ilköğretim okullarında nitel bir araştırma. Uludağ Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 24 (1), 1-29.
  • Eren, E. (2019). Yönetim ve organizasyon (Çağdaş ve küresel yaklaşımlar). Beta Basım Yayım Dağıtım.
  • Eriş, H., Kayhan, H., Baştaş, M., & Gamar, C. (2017). Teacher and administrative staff views on teachers’ participation in decision making process. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(11), 7411-7420.
  • Güçlü, N., Özer, A., Kurt, T., & Koşar, S. (2015). Liderlik stilleri, karar verme stratejileri ve kişiliğin okullardaki karar sürecine etkilerinin çok düzeyli analizi. International Journal of Human Sciences, 12 (2), 1756-1791.
  • Hammad, W. (2010). Teachers’ perceptions of school culture as a barrier to shared decision‐making (SDM) in Egypt’s secondary schools. Compare, 40(1), 97-110.
  • Hardman, D., & Harries, C. (2002). How rational are we? The Psychologist, 15(2), 76–79.
  • Heller, F. A. (1992). Decision making and leadership. Camridge University Press.
  • Heystek, J.(2010). School governing bodies in South African schools: Under pressure to enhance democratisation andimprove quality. South African Journal of Education 39 (4): 455–468.
  • Honingh, M., & Hooge, E. (2013). The effect of school-leader support and participation in decision making on teacher collaboration in Dutch primary and secondary schools. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 42 (1), 75-98. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143213499256.
  • Hoy, W. K., & Miskel, C. G. (2004). Educational administration: Theory, research, and practice. McGraw-Hill International Edition.
  • Hoy, W. K., & Tarter, C. J. (2003). Administrators solving the problems of practice: Decision-making ceoncepts, cases, and consequences. Allyn and Bacon.
  • Johnson, S. M.,& Boles, K. C. (1994). The role of teachers in school reform. S. A. Mohrman, & P. Wohlstetter (Eds.), School-based management: Organizing for high performance(pp. 109-137). Jossey-Bass.
  • Lindelow, J.,& Heynderickx, J. (1990). Participative decision-making. S. C. Smith, & P. K. Piele (Eds.), School leadership: Handbook for excellence(pp. 109-134). ERIC Clearinghouse Educational Management.
  • Lunenburg, F. C., & Ornstein, A. (2011). Educational administration: Concepts and practices. Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
  • Mager, U., & Nowak, P. (2012). Effects of student participation in decision making at school. A systematic review and synthesis of empirical research. Educational Research Review, 7(1), 38-61.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2011.11.001
  • Manasse, A. L. (1985). Improving conditions for principal effectiveness: Policy implications of research. Elementary School Journal, 85(3), 349-463.
  • March, J. G. (1994). Primer on decision making: How decisions happen. The Free Press.
  • March, J. G., & Simon, H. A. (1958). Organizations. John Wiley & Sons.
  • Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. Jossey-Bass.
  • Mokoena, S., & Machaisa, R. (2018). More heads are better than one: School-based decision-making in varied school environments. Africa Education Review, 15(1), 138-156.
  • Ölçüm, D. (2015). Okul yöneticilerinin karar verme stillerinin öğretmenlerin iş doyumuna etkisi.(Unpublished Master's Thesis). Sakarya University.
  • Pashiardis, P. (1994). Teacher participation in decision making. International Journal of Educational Management, 8(5), 14-17.
  • Richardson, V.,& Placier, P. (2001). Teacher change. American Educational Research Association.
  • Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2017). Organizational behavior. Pearson.
  • Sarafidou, J. O., & Chatziioannidis, G. (2013). Teacher participation in decision making and its impact on school and teachers. International Journal of Educational Management, 27(2), 170-183.
  • Sezer, Ş. (2016). Okul müdürlerinin görev öncelikleri ve karar alma süreçlerini etkileyen faktörlere ilişkin görüşleri. İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 17(3), 121-137. https://doi:10.17679/iuefd.17311445
  • Shaked, H.,& Schechter, C. (2019). Exploring systems thinking in school principals ‘decision-making. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 22(5), 573-596.
  • Simon, H. A. (1986). Rationality in psychology and economics. Journal of Business, 59(4), 209-224.
  • Smit, M.H., & Oosthuizen, I.J. (2011). Improving school governance through participative democracy and the law. South African Journal of Education, 31, 55-73.
  • Smylie, M. A. (1992). Teacher participation in school decision making: Assessing willingness to participate. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 14 (1), 53-67.
  • Somech, A. (2010). Participative decision making in schools: A mediating-moderating analytical framework for understanding school and teacher outcomes. Educational Administration Quarterly 46 (2): 174-209.
  • Sukirno, D. S., & Siengthai, S. (2011). Does participative decision making affect lecturer performance in higher education? International Journal of Educational Management, 25 (5), 494-508.
  • Türk, Ö., & Tulunay Ateş, Ö. (2019, Mayıs). Okul müdürlerinin okulda karar verme hakkında görüşlerinin değerlendirilmesi. 14. Uluslararası Eğitim Yönetimi Kongresi, 203-213. İzmir.http://eyk14.eyedder.org.tr/tr/anasayfa/
  • Üzüm, H., & Kurt, T. (2019). Okullarda katılımcı karar verme sürecinin incelenmesi. Eğitim ve Toplum Araştırmaları Dergisi, 6 (1), 95-112.
  • Wadesango, N. (2012). The influence of teacher participation in Decision-Making on student Performance. The Anthropologist, 14(5), 425-431.
  • Wan, E. (2005). Teacher empowerment: Concepts, strategies, and implications for schools in Hong Kong. Teachers College Record, 107 (4), 842-861.
  • Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2013). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri. Seçkin Yayıncılık.
Toplam 55 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular Eğitim Üzerine Çalışmalar
Bölüm Sayı Makaleleri
Yazarlar

Muammer Maral 0000-0002-2055-5711

Yayımlanma Tarihi 28 Şubat 2022
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2022 Cilt: 13 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

APA Maral, M. (2022). Exploring School Administrators’ Perceptions on Participative Decision Making Process / Okul Yöneticilerinin Katılımcı Karar Verme Sürecine Yönelik Algılarının İncelenmesi. e-Uluslararası Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 13(1), 118-140. https://doi.org/10.19160/e-ijer.1038386
 Kapak Resmi İndir

This journal uses a CC BY-NC-SA license.


[email protected]        http://www.e-ijer.com       Adres: Ege Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi  Bornova/İzmir