TR
EN
Adaptation of the Interpersonal Stress Scale for Psychological Counselors to Turkish Culture / Psikolojik Danışmanlar için Kişilerarası Stres Ölçeği’nin Türk Kültürüne Uyarlanması
Abstract
Considering that the therapeutic relationship and therapeutic conditions are inseparable conditions for the counseling process, it is important to bring a scale to the Turkish literature to examine the interpersonal stress experienced by counselors during the counseling process. In this research, the scale adaptation process from one language to another language was carried out. In this context, validity and reliability studies were carried out in 4 different samples. As a result of the research, it was seen that there was a moderate and high-level significant relationship between the Turkish and English forms of the scale in all of the items. With this, it is seen that the four-dimensional structure (χ2/sd=2.881) was confirmed in the CFA results of the linguistic adaptation process in the validity and reliability study of ISSC. When the fit values of the ISSC are examined (RMSEA=.08, SRMR=.07, GFI=.89, and AGFI=.85), it is seen that the four-dimensional structure of the scale's CFA results is confirmed. Considering the item-total correlation of the ISSC, it is seen that the item-total scores vary between .237 and .634. The Cronbach Alpha coefficient calculated for the reliability coefficient of the scale was found to be .878, and the McDonald's ω coefficient was .874. When the test-retest results of the Turkish version of the scale were examined, it was concluded that the reliability value was r=.79 (p<.001). In addition, the test-retest result in the open-ended part of the scale was 88%. When the results split half reliabilityanalysis of the scale are examined, there is a moderate and high level of significant correlation between the sub-dimensions. In this respect, it can be said that ISSC is reliable in measuring interpersonal stress in their relationship with the client.
Keywords
Kaynakça
- Akdoğan, R., & Ceyhan, E. (2011). Terapötik ilişkide insan faktörü. Psikiyatride Güncel Yaklaşımlar, 3(1), 117-141. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/115126
- Anastasi, A. (1982). Psychological testing. Mac Millan Publishing.
- Ayyıldız, H. ve Cengiz, E. (2006). Pazarlama modellerinin testinde kullanılabilecek yapısal eşitlik modeli (YEM) üzerine kavramsal bir inceleme. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 11(1), 63-84.
- Baykul, Y. (2000). Eğitimde ve psikolojide ölçme. ÖSYM Yayınları.
- Brace, N., Kemp, R., & Snelgar, R. (2003). SPSS for psychologists. Hampshire.
- Broome, K., McKenna, K., Fleming, J., & Worrall, L. (2009). Bus use and older people: A literature review applying the Person–Environment–Occupation model in macro practice. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 16(1), 3-12. https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/11038120802326222
- Choi, H., Puig, A., Kim, K., Lee, S., & Lee, S. M. (2014). Examining differential effects of internal and external resources on counselor burnout symptoms in South Korea. Journal of Employment Counseling, 51(1), 2-15. https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/j.2161-1920.2014.00037.x
- Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Ayrıntılar
Birincil Dil
İngilizce
Konular
Eğitim Üzerine Çalışmalar
Bölüm
Araştırma Makalesi
Yayımlanma Tarihi
30 Ekim 2022
Gönderilme Tarihi
16 Mayıs 2022
Kabul Tarihi
10 Ekim 2022
Yayımlandığı Sayı
Yıl 2022 Cilt: 13 Sayı: 5
APA
Kurtuluş, E., Yıldırım Kurtuluş, H., & Düşünceli, B. (2022). Adaptation of the Interpersonal Stress Scale for Psychological Counselors to Turkish Culture / Psikolojik Danışmanlar için Kişilerarası Stres Ölçeği’nin Türk Kültürüne Uyarlanması. e-Uluslararası Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 13(5), 93-108. https://doi.org/10.19160/e-ijer.1117470