Investigation of the Relationship Between Pre-service Teachers' Critical Thinking Dispositions and Attitudes Towards Socioscientific Issues / Öğretmen Adaylarının Eleştirel Düşünme Eğilimleri ile Sosyobilimsel Konulara Yönelik Tutumları Arasındaki İlişkinin İncelenmesi

Adem Yılmaz; Muhammed Salman

doi:10.19160/e-ijer.1054393

EN TR

Investigation of the Relationship Between Pre-service Teachers' Critical Thinking Dispositions and Attitudes Towards Socioscientific Issues / Öğretmen Adaylarının Eleştirel Düşünme Eğilimleri ile Sosyobilimsel Konulara Yönelik Tutumları Arasındaki İlişkinin İncelenmesi

Abstract

In this study, the relationship between pre-service teachers' critical thinking dispositions and their attitudes towards socioscientific issues was examined. Relational survey method, which is one of the quantitative research approaches, was used in the research process. 813 pre-service teachers from science, mathematics, preschool, psychological counseling and guidance, social sciences, classroom teaching, and fine arts departments studying at education faculties in state universities in the Black Sea Region of Turkey participated in the research. Critical thinking disposition and attitude scales were used as data collection tools in the research. The findings were examined by considering the variables of gender, class level, knowledge about socioscientific issues and the department of education. In the analysis of the data obtained, the results for each scale were first divided into groups as low, medium and high scores. Variables with two categories were analyzed using the independent samples t-test, and variables with more than two categories were analyzed using the ANOVA test. Then, multiple linear regression analyses were performed. Hayes's (2018) regression model number 1 was used to confirm the research results and to support it with advanced statistics. As a result of the research, it was determined that the pre-service teachers with low and medium critical thinking dispositions also had low attitudes towards socioscientific issues and sub-variables did not make a significant difference. At this point, some suggestions can be made to pre-service teachers with a low and medium level of critical thinking disposition. It can be ensured that they participate in project activities on socioscientific issues during the training process. It can be ensured that courses within the scope of critical and analytical thinking are taken. It has also been determined that the pre-service teachers with high critical thinking disposition have high attitudes towards socioscientific issues, and there is a significant difference in terms of the variables of the department, grade level and having knowledge about socioscientific issues.

Keywords

Öğretmen Adaylarının Eleştirel Düşünme Eğilimleri ile Sosyobilimsel Konulara Yönelik Tutumları Arasındaki İlişkinin İncelenmesi / Investigation of the Relationship Between Pre-service Teachers' Critical Thinking Dispositions and Attitudes Towards Socioscientific Issues

Öz

Bu çalışmada, öğretmen adaylarının eleştirel düşünme eğilimleri ile sosyobilimsel konulara yönelik tutumları arasındaki ilişki incelenmiştir. Araştırma sürecinde nicel araştırma yaklaşımlarından biri olan ilişkisel tarama yöntemi kullanılmıştır. Araştırmaya Türkiye'nin Karadeniz Bölgesi'ndeki devlet üniversitelerinin eğitim fakültelerinde öğrenim görmekte olan fen bilgisi, matematik, okul öncesi, psikolojik danışma ve rehberlik, sosyal bilimler, sınıf öğretmenliği ve güzel sanatlar bölümlerinden 813 öğretmen adayı katılmıştır. Araştırmada veri toplama aracı olarak eleştirel düşünme eğilimi ve tutum ölçekleri kullanılmıştır. Bulgular cinsiyet, sınıf düzeyi, sosyobilimsel konularda bilgi sahibi olma ve eğitim fakültesi bölümü değişkenleri dikkate alınarak incelenmiştir. Elde edilen verilerin analizinde her bir ölçeğe ait sonuçlar önce düşük, orta ve yüksek puanlar olarak gruplara ayrılmıştır. İki kategorili değişkenler bağımsız örnekler t testi kullanılarak, ikiden fazla kategoriye sahip değişkenler ise ANOVA testi kullanılarak analiz edilmiştir. Daha sonra çoklu doğrusal regresyon analizleri yapılmıştır. Araştırma sonuçlarını doğrulamak ve ileri istatistiklerle desteklemek için Hayes'in (2018) 1 numaralı regresyon modeli kullanılmıştır. Araştırma sonucunda düşük ve orta düzeyde eleştirel düşünme eğilimine sahip öğretmen adaylarının sosyobilimsel konulara yönelik tutumlarının da düşük olduğu ve alt değişkenlerin anlamlı bir fark yaratmadığı belirlenmiştir. Bu noktada eleştirel düşünme eğilimi düşük ve orta düzeyde olan öğretmen adaylarına bazı önerilerde bulunulabilir. Eğitim sürecinde sosyobilimsel konularda proje faaliyetlerine katılmaları sağlanabilir. Eleştirel ve analitik düşünme kapsamında derslerin alınması sağlanabilir. Eleştirel düşünme eğilimi yüksek olan öğretmen adaylarının sosyobilimsel konulara yönelik tutumlarının da yüksek olduğu görülmüştür. Ayrıca öğretmen adaylarının görüşlerinin bölüm, sınıf düzeyi ve sosyobilimsel konularda bilgi sahibi olma değişkenleri açısından anlamlı farklılık gösterdiği belirlenmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kaynakça

Abraham, A. (2016). Gender and creativity: An overview of psychological and neuroscientific literature. Brain Imaging and Behavior, 10(2), 609-618. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11682-015-9410-8
Ageitos, N., & Puig, B. (2021). Critical thinking to decide what to believe and what to do regarding vaccination in schools. A case study with primary pre-service teachers. Critical Thinking in Biology and Environmental Education. Facing Challenges in a Post-Truth World.
Alfitriyani, N., Pursitasari, I. D., & Kurniasih, S. (2021). Biotechnology module based on sociosaintific issues to improve student's critical thinking ability through online learning. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika dan IPA, 12(1), 23-39. http://dx.doi.org/10.26418/jpmipa.v12i1.43179
Bellaera, L., Weinstein-Jones, Y., Ilie, S., & Baker, S. T. (2021). Critical thinking in practice: The priorities and practices of instructors teaching in higher education. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 41,1-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100856
Bensley, D. A. (1998). Critical thinking in psychology: A unified skills approach. Thomson Brooks/Cole Publishing Co. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1998-06468-000
Bravo, M. J., Galiana, L., Rodrigo, M. F., Navarro-Pérez, J. J., & Oliver, A. (2020). An adaptation of the critical thinking disposition scale in Spanish youth. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 38, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100748
Burnard, P., Colucci-Gray, L., & Sinha, P. (2021). Transdisciplinarity: Letting arts and science teach together. Curric Perspect, 41, 113-118. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41297-020-00128-y
Chan, Z. C. (2019). Nursing students' view of critical thinking as ‘Own thinking, searching for truth, and cultural influences’. Nurse Education Today, 78, 14-18. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.nedt.2019.03.015

Chang, S. N., & Chiu, M. H. (2008). Lakatos’ scientific research programmes as a framework for analysing informal argumentation about socio‐scientific issues. International Journal of Science Education, 30(13), 1753-1773. https://doi.org/10.1080/095006907 01534582
Čavojová, V., Šrol, J., & Jurkovič, M. (2020). Why should we try to think like scientists? Scientific reasoning and susceptibility to epistemically suspect beliefs and cognitive biases. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 34(1), 85-95. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3595
Cole, S. (1992). Making science: Between nature and society. Harvard University Press. https://www.hup.harvard.edu/catalog.php?isbn=9780674543478
Davies, M. (2015). A model of critical thinking in higher education. M.B. Paulsen (Ed.). In Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (pp. 41-92). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12835-1_2
Domenech, A. M., & Marquez, C. (2013). Promoting students' critical thinking through the design of scientific researches related to a SSI: the case of ADHD. ESERA Conference Proceeding. https://gent.uab.cat/conxitamarquez/sites/gent.uab.cat.conxitamarquez/file s/Ana%20Ma_Dom%C3%A8nech_2Feb2014.pdf
Dwyer, C. P., Hogan, M. J., & Stewart, I. (2012). An evaluation of argument mapping as a method of enhancing critical thinking performance in e-learning environments. Metacognition and Learning, 7(3), 219-244. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11 409-012-9092-1
Dwyer, C. P., Hogan, M. J., Harney, O. M., & Kavanagh, C. (2017). Facilitating a student-educator conceptual model of dispositions towards critical thinking through interactive management. Educational Technology Research and Development, 65(1), 47-73. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-016-9460-7
Eggert, S., Ostermeyer, F., Hasselhorn, M., & Bögeholz, S. (2013). Socioscientific decision making in the science classroom: The effect of embedded metacognitive instructions on students' learning outcomes. Education Research International, Special Issue, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/309894
Ennis, R. H. (1996). Critical thinking dispositions: Their nature and assessability. Informal Logic, 18(2&3), 165-182. https://informallogic.ca/index.php/informal_logic/article/vi ew/2378/1820
Ennis, R. H. (2018). Critical thinking across the curriculum: A vision. Topoi, 37(1), 165-184. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-016-9401-4
Evagorou, M., & Dillon, J. (2020) Introduction: Socio-scientific issues as promoting responsible citizenship and the relevance of science. In: Evagorou M., Nielsen J., Dillon J. (eds). Science Teacher Education for Responsible Citizenship. Contemporary Trends and Issues in Science Education (pp.1-11), Vol 52. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-40229-7_1
Facione, P. A., Facione, N. C., & Giancarlo, C. A. F. (2000). The California critical thinking disposition inventory: CCTDI test manual. California Acad. Press. https://scholar.google.com/citations?view_op=view_citation&hl=en&user=7oqEut0AAAAJ&citation_for_view=7oqEut0AAAAJ:u-x6o8ySG0sC
Facione, P. A., Sanchez, C. A., Facione, N. C., & Gainen, J. (1995). The disposition toward critical thinking. The Journal of General Education, 44(1), 1-25. https://www.insightassessment.com/wp-content/uploads/ia/pdf/Disposition_to_CT_19 95_JGE.pdf
Fong, C. J., Kim, Y., Davis, C. W., Hoang, T., & Kim, Y. W. (2017). A meta-analysis on critical thinking and community college student achievement. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 26, 71-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2017.06.002
Forawi, S. A. (2016). Standard-based science education and critical thinking. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 20, 52-62. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2016.02.005
Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2019). How to design and evaluate research in education (10th Edition). McGraw-Hill. https://www.mheducation.com/highered/ product/how-design-evaluate-research-education-fraenkel-wallen/M9781259913839. html
Friedrichsen, P. J., Ke, L., Sadler, T. D., & Zangori, L. (2021). Enacting co-designed socio-scientific issues-based curriculum units: A case of secondary science teacher learning. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 32(1), 85-106. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2020.1795576
Goodlad, J. (1984). A place called school’ Prospects for the future. McGraw-Hill. https://academic.oup.com/cs/article-abstract/6/3/213/352529?redirectedFrom=fulltext
Gul, M. D., & Akcay, H. (2020). Structuring a new socioscientific issues (SSI) based instruction model: Impacts on pre-service science teachers' (PSTs) critical thinking skills and dispositions. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 6(1), 141-159. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijres.v6i1.785
Halpern, D. F. (1993). Assessing the effectiveness of critical-thinking instruction. The Journal of General Education, 42(4), 238-254. https://www.deepdyve.com/lp/psu_press/asses sing-the-effectiveness-of-critical-thinking-instruction-vz9ltc0jLB
Halpern, D. F. (1999). Teaching for critical thinking: Helping college students develop the skills and dispositions of a critical thinker. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 80, 69-74. https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.8005
Hancock, P. A., Kaplan, A. D., Cruit, J. K., Hancock, G. M., MacArthur, K. R., & Szalma, J. L. (2019). A meta-analysis of flow effects and the perception of time. Acta Psychologica, 198, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2019.04.007
Hayes, A. F. (2018). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression based approach. Guilford Publications. https://www.guilford.com/books/ Introduction-to-Mediation-Moderation-and-Conditional-Process-Analysis/Andrew-Hayes/9781462534654
Jafari, F., Azizi, S. M., Soroush, A., & Khatony, A. (2020). Critical thinking level among medical sciences students in Iran. Education Research International, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/1348365
Janssen, E. M., Mainhard, T., Buisman, R. S., Verkoeijen, P. P., Heijltjes, A. E., van Peppen, L. M., & van Gog, T. (2019). Training higher education teachers’ critical thinking and attitudes towards teaching it. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 58, 310-322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.03.007
Kampourakis, K. (2018). Science and uncertainty. Science & Education, 27(9), 829–830. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-018-0019-3
Karışan, D., & Zeidler, D. L. (2017). Contextualization of nature of science within the socioscientific issues framework: A review of research. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 5(2), 139-152. https://doi.org/10.18404/ijemst.270186
Karışan, D., & Yılmaz, A. (2021). Uzaktan eğitimde STEM uygulamalarının sosyobilimsel konular açısından incelenmesi. A. Yılmaz, B. Ertuğrul-Akyol ve M. N. Aydede (Edts). Uzaktan eğitim sürecinde örnek etkinliklerle STEM uygulamaları içinde (s. 139-164). Pegem Akademi Yayınları.
Karpudewan, M., & Chan, L. H. (2020). Educating primary students on infectious diseases and nurturing character and values using socioscientific instruction. Journal of Public Health: From Theory to Practice, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10389-020-01368-y
Kavenuke, P. S., Kinyota, M., & Kayombo, J. J. (2020). The critical thinking skills of prospective teachers: Investigating their systematicity, self-confidence and scepticism. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 37, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020. 100677
Kienhues, D., Jucks, R., & Bromme, R. (2020). Sealing the gateways for post-truthism: Reestablishing the epistemic authority of science. Educational Psychologist, 55(3), 144-154. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2020.1784012
Kolstø, S. D. (2001). Scientific literacy for citizenship: Tools for dealing with the science dimension of controversial socioscientific issues. Science education, 85(3), 291-310. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.1011
Lee, H., Abd‐El‐Khalick, F., & Choi, K. (2006). Korean science teachers’ perceptions of the introduction of socio‐scientific issues into the science curriculum. Canadian Journal of Math, Science & Technology Education, 6(2), 97-117. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 14926150609556691
Levinson, R. (2006). Towards a theoretical framework for teaching controversial socio‐scientific issues. International Journal of Science Education, 28(10), 1201-1224. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690600560753
Levrini, O., Tasquier, G., Barelli, E., Laherto, A., Palmgren, E., Branchetti, L., & Wilson, C. (2020). Recognition and operationalization of future‐scaffolding skills: Results from an empirical study of a teaching–learning module on climate change and futures thinking. Science Education, 105(2), 281-308. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21612
McPeck, J.E. (2016). Teaching critical thinking: Dialogue and dialectic (E-Book). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315526492
Nguyen, A., & Catalan, D. (2020). Digital mis/disinformation and public engagment with health and science controversies: Fresh perspectives from COVID-19. Media and Communication, 8(2), 323–328. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v8i2.3352
Nonis, S. A., & Hudson, G. I. (2019). Developing and assessing critical thinking skills in marketing students: The power of making explicit problem-solving processes. Journal of Education for Business, 94(3), 195-203. https://doi.org/10.1080/08832323.2018. 1504737
OECD (2019). OECD learning compass 2030: A series of concept notes. Paris, France: OECD. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/62212c37-en.pdf?expires=1622538706&id= id&accname=oid030093&checksum=8A8FFE72C7741403825D0CC07026EF01
Ozgenel, M., & Cetin, M. (2018). Development of the Marmara critical thinking dispositions scale: Validity and reliability analysis. International Journal of Eurasia Social Sciences, 9(32), 991-1015. http://www.ijoess.com/Makaleler/77393914_5.%20991-1015%20 mustafa%20%c3%b6zgenel.pdf
Paul, R. (1990). Critical thinking: What every person needs to survive in a rapidly changing world. https://www.amazon.com/ Critical-Thinking-Survive-RapidlyChanging/dp/094 4583075
Pitpiorntapin, S., & Topçu, M. S. (2016). Teaching based on socioscientific issues in science classrooms: A review study. KKU International Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 6(1), 119-136. http://www.resjournal.kku.ac.th/social/PDF/6_1_7.pdf
Pratiwi, Y. N., Rahayu, S., & Fajaroh, F. (2016). Socioscientific issues (SSI) in reaction rates topic and its effect on the critical thinking skills of high school students. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 5(2), 164-170. https://journal.unnes.ac.id/nju/index.php/ jpii/article/download/7676/5447
Puig, B., Blanco-Anaya, P., & Pérez-Maceira, J. J. (2021). “Fake news” or Real Science? Critical thinking to assess information on COVID-19. Frontiers in Education, 6, 92. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.646909
Ren, X., Tong, Y., Peng, P., & Wang, T. (2020). Critical thinking predicts academic performance beyond general cognitive ability: Evidence from adults and children. Intelligence, 82, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2020.101487
Sadler, T. D., Chambers, F. W., & Zeidler, D. L. (2002). Investigating the crossroads of socioscientific issues, the nature of science, and critical thinking. Paper presented to the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, New Orleans, LA. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED466401.pdf
Sadler, T. D., & Zeidler, D. L. (2005). The significance of content knowledge for informal reasoning regarding socioscientific issues: Applying genetics knowledge to genetic engineering issues. Science education, 89(1), 71-93. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20023
Sadler, T. D., Romine, W. L., & Topçu, M. S. (2016). Learning science content through socio-scientific issues-based instruction: A multilevel assessment study. International Journal of Science Education, 38(10), 1622-1635. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016. 1204481
Salali, G. D., & Uysal, M. S. (2020). COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy is associated with beliefs on the origin of the novel coronavirus in the UK and Turkey. Psychological medicine, 1-3. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291720004067
Salman, M., & Yılmaz, A. (2021). The relationship between the attitude towards socioscientific issues and views on COVID-19 and vaccine. International Journal of Psychology and Educational Studies, 8(Special Issue), 83-98. https://dx.doi.org/10.52380/ijpes.2021.8.4.667
Shin, K. R., Lee, J. H., Ha, J. Y., & Kim, K. H. (2006). Critical thinking dispositions in baccalaureate nursing students. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 56(2), 182-189. https://doi.org10.1111/j.1365-2648.2006.03995.x
Sinatra, G. M., & Lombardi, D. (2020). Evaluating sources of scientific evidence and claims in the post-truth era may require reappraising plausibility judgments. Educational Psychologist, 55(3), 120–131. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2020.1730181
Sjöström, J., & Eilks, I. (2018). Reconsidering different visions of scientific literacy and science education based on the concept of Bildung. Dori, Y. J., Mevarech, Z. R., Baker, D. R. (Eds.). In Cognition, metacognition, and culture in STEM education (pp. 65-88). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66659-4
Tal, T., & Kedmi, Y. (2006). Teaching socioscientific issues: Classroom culture and students’ performances. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 1(4), 615-644. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-006-9026-9
Topçu, M. S. (2010). Development of attitudes towards socioscientific issues scale for undergraduate students. Evaluation & Research in Education, 23(1), 51-67. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500791003628187
Topçu, M. S. (2019). Sosyobilimsel konular ve öğretimi (Socioscientific issues and teaching). Pegem Akademi. https://www.pegem.net/dosyalar/dokuman/2562021141149sosyobil imsel.pdf
Torres, N., & Solbes, J. (2016). Contributions of intervention teaching using socioscientific issues to develop critical thinking. Enseñanza de las Ciencias, 34(2), 43-65. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/ensciencias.1638
Tyrrell, D., & Calinger, M. (2020). Breaking the COVID-19 Ice: Integrating socioscientific issues into problem-based learning lessons in middle school. In Proceedings of EdMedia + Innovate Learning (pp. 120-125). Online, The Netherlands: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). https://www.learntechlib.org/ primary/p/217293/.
Tsui, L. (1999). Courses and instruction affecting critical thinking. Research in Higher Education, 40(2), 185-200. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018734630124
Wang, H. H., Chen, H. T., Lin, H. S., Huang, Y. N., & Hong, Z. R. (2017). Longitudinal study of a cooperation-driven, socio-scientific issue intervention on promoting students’ critical thinking and self-regulation in learning science. International Journal of Science Education, 39(15), 2002-2026.
Williams, R. L., Oliver, R., & Stockdale, S. (2004). Psychological versus generic critical thinking as predictors and outcome measures in a large undergraduate human development course. The Journal of General Education, 53(1), 37-58. https://www.jstor.org/stable/27797975?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
Wilson, J. A. (2018). Reducing pseudoscientific and paranormal beliefs in university students through a course in science and critical thinking. Science & Education, 27(1), 183-210. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-018-9956-0
Wineburg, S., & McGrew, S. (2017). Lateral reading: Reading less and learning more when evaluating digital information. Teachers College Record. https://purl.stanford.edu/ yk133ht8603
Yacoubian, H. A. (2015). A framework for guiding future citizens to think critically about nature of science and socioscientific issues. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 15(3), 248-260. https://doi.org/10.1080/14926156.2015. 1051671
Yacoubian, H. A., & Khishfe, R. (2018). Argumentation, critical thinking, nature of science and socioscientific issues: a dialogue between two researchers. International Journal of Science Education, 40(7), 796-807. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1449986
Yahaya, J. M., Zain, A.N.M., & Karpudewan, M. (2015). The effects of socio-scientific instruction on pre-service teachers’ sense of efficacy for learning and teaching controversial family health issues. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13(2), 467-491. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-014-9537-x
Yang, S. C., & Chung, T. Y. (2009). Experimental study of teaching critical thinking in civic education in Taiwanese junior high school. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 79(1), 29-55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1348/000709907X238771
Zeidler, D. L., Lederman, N. G., & Taylor, S. C. (1992). Fallacies and Student Discourse: Conceptualizing the Role of Critical Thinking in Science Education. Science Education, 76(4), 437-450. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730760407
Zeidler, D. L., & Nichols, B. H. (2009). Socioscientific issues: Theory and practice. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 21(2), 44-58. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03173684

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

Eğitim Üzerine Çalışmalar

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yazarlar

Adem Yılmaz ^*
0000-0002-1424-8934
Türkiye

Muhammed Salman
0000-0003-2144-4842
Türkiye

Yayımlanma Tarihi

28 Şubat 2022

Gönderilme Tarihi

6 Ocak 2022

Kabul Tarihi

17 Şubat 2022

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2022 Cilt: 13 Sayı: 1

DOI

https://doi.org/10.19160/e-ijer.1054393

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA73YC93WU

Kaynak Göster

RIS / Bibtex

APA

Yılmaz, A., & Salman, M. (2022). Investigation of the Relationship Between Pre-service Teachers’ Critical Thinking Dispositions and Attitudes Towards Socioscientific Issues / Öğretmen Adaylarının Eleştirel Düşünme Eğilimleri ile Sosyobilimsel Konulara Yönelik Tutumları Arasındaki İlişkinin İncelenmesi. e-Uluslararası Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 13(1), 203-219. https://doi.org/10.19160/e-ijer.1054393

Investigation of the Relationship Between Pre-service Teachers' Critical Thinking Dispositions and Attitudes Towards Socioscientific Issues / Öğretmen Adaylarının Eleştirel Düşünme Eğilimleri ile Sosyobilimsel Konulara Yönelik Tutumları Arasındaki İlişkinin İncelenmesi

Investigation of the Relationship Between Pre-service Teachers' Critical Thinking Dispositions and Attitudes Towards Socioscientific Issues / Öğretmen Adaylarının Eleştirel Düşünme Eğilimleri ile Sosyobilimsel Konulara Yönelik Tutumları Arasındaki İlişkinin İncelenmesi

Abstract

Keywords

Öğretmen Adaylarının Eleştirel Düşünme Eğilimleri ile Sosyobilimsel Konulara Yönelik Tutumları Arasındaki İlişkinin İncelenmesi / Investigation of the Relationship Between Pre-service Teachers' Critical Thinking Dispositions and Attitudes Towards Socioscientific Issues

Öz

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kaynakça

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

Konular

Bölüm

Yazarlar

Yayımlanma Tarihi

Gönderilme Tarihi

Kabul Tarihi

Yayımlandığı Sayı

DOI

IZ

Kaynak Göster

Cited By

Din Öğretimi Öğretmen Adaylarının Bilişsel Esneklik Düzeyleri ile Eleştirel Düşünme Eğilimlerinin İncelenmesi

University students’ cognitive flexibility and critical thinking dispositions

“Why Am I Going to Teach Science?” : Pre-Service Science Teachers` Perspectives on Science Education

Relationship between Cognitive Flexibility and Critical Thinking Tendency: A Study on Sports Sciences Faculty Students