Research Article

Turkish version of the Career and Work Adaptability Questionnaire (CWAQ): Validity and Reliability Study

Volume: 5 Number: 1 April 28, 2014
EN TR

Turkish version of the Career and Work Adaptability Questionnaire (CWAQ): Validity and Reliability Study

Abstract

The aim of this research is to examine the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Career and Work Adaptability Questionnaire (CWAQ; Nota, Ginevra, and Soresi, 2012). The validity and reliability of scale was investigated by test re-test, Cronbach alpha, confirmatory factor analysis and criterion related validity methods. The Career Adaptability and Optimism Scale was used for the criterion related validity. The participants of research were 332 (183 female and 149 male) teachers who were employed in different schools in Istanbul and Sakarya. Results of confirmatory factor analysis indicated that the five-dimensional Career and Work Adaptability model (confidence, control, cooperation, curiosity, and concern) was well fit (x²=1082.87, df= 416, RMSEA=.052, NNFI= .90, CFI=.91, IFI=.91, RFI=.84, GFI= .89, SRMR= .047). The internal consistency coefficients of five subscales were .83, .69, .88, .81, and .67 respectively. In the concurrent validity significant relationship (r= .43) was found between the Career Adaptability-Optimism Scale and the Career -Work Adaptability Questionnaire. The overall internal consistency coefficient of the scale was .93. Test-retest reliability coefficient was .72. The corrected item-total correlations of CWAQ ranged from .40 to .63. The t-test results differences between each item’s means of upper 27% and lower 27% points were significant. Overall findings demonstrated that this scale had high validity and reliability scores and that it may be used in order to measure degree of career adaptability accurately. 

Keywords

References

  1. Akın, A., Hamedoğlu, M. A., Kaya, Ç., Arslan, S., Demir, T., Sarıçam, H., Uysal, R. (2014). Turkish Version of the Career Adapt-Abilities Scale (CAAS): The Validity and Reliability Study (Chapter 54). In Banerjee, S., Erçetin, Ş. Ş. (2014). Chaos, Complexity and Leadership 2012. 499- 505, Springer: Dordrecht
  2. Bentler, P. M., & Bonet, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588-606.
  3. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2011). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı. Ankara: Pegem Akademi yayınları.
  4. Davy, J. A., Kinicki, A., & Scheck, C. L. (1997). A test of job security's direct and mediated effects on withdrawal cognitions. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 18, 323−349.
  5. Erdoğmuş Zorver, C., & Korkut Owen, F. (2011). Kariyer Uyumu ve İyimserliği Ölçeğinin Geliştirilmesi. XI. Ulusal Psikolojik Danışmanlık ve Rehberlik Kongresi, 27 Eylül 2011, İzmir.
  6. Erdoğmuş Zorver, C. (2011). Kariyer Uyumu ve İyimserliği Ölçeğinin Geliştirilmesi. Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Ankara Üniversitesi, Ankara.
  7. İŞKUR, (2011). İş ve Meslek Danışmanlığı. Ankara: Altan Özyurt Matbaacılık.
  8. Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structural analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 155.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

-

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

April 28, 2014

Submission Date

April 17, 2013

Acceptance Date

-

Published in Issue

Year 2014 Volume: 5 Number: 1

APA
Kaya, Ç., Akın, A., Sarıçam, H., & Uğur, E. (2014). Turkish version of the Career and Work Adaptability Questionnaire (CWAQ): Validity and Reliability Study. E-Uluslararası Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 5(1), 76-87. https://doi.org/10.19160/e-ijer.64074

Cited By

Creative Commons Lisansı
This journal uses a CC BY-NC-SA license.
 

[email protected]    http://www.e-ijer.com    

Postal Address: Erzene District, Istanbul Street, Ege University, Faculty of Education, 35040, İzmir/Türkiye