Üniversite Öğrencilerinde Baş Etme Yetkinliğinin Yordayıcısı Olarak Psikolojik Esneklik / Psychological Flexibility as a Predictor of Coping Self-Efficacy Among University Students

Sinem Acar

doi:10.19160/e-ijer.1035566

EN TR

Psychological Flexibility as a Predictor of Coping Self-Efficacy Among University Students / Üniversite Öğrencilerinde Baş Etme Yetkinliğinin Yordayıcısı Olarak Psikolojik Esneklik

Abstract

The aim of this study is to examine the predictive relationship between coping self-efficacy belief and psychological flexibility. Another aim of the study id to examine sex differences according to variables. The research was designed in the survey model using the quantitative research method. The sample of the research consists of 1st and 2nd year students attending different departments in a state university. The sample consists of 136 people, 72 of whom are women and 64 are men. The age range of the study group was 17-24 and the mean age was 21.42 (Sd: 1.76). In the research, the Coping Self-Efficacy Scale was used to measure the level of coping self-efficacy and the Acceptance and Action Form-2 was used to measure the level of psychological flexibility as data collection tools. The correlation coefficient was calculated in order to determine whether there was a significant relationship between the variables. The predictive relationship between the variables was examined by simple regression analysis. The sub-dimensions of coping self-efficacy (problem-focused coping, coping with social support, coping by stopping feelings and thoughts) and psychological flexibility were examined with the T-test to examine sex differences. According to the findings, there is a moderate and negative significant relationship between psychological flexibility and coping self-efficacy (r =-.41, p<.001), and psychological flexibility explains 16% of the variance of coping self-efficacy. According to another result, coping self-efficacy, sub-dimensions of coping-efficacy and psychological flexibility do not show a significant difference according to gender.

Keywords

Üniversite Öğrencilerinde Baş Etme Yetkinliğinin Yordayıcısı Olarak Psikolojik Esneklik / Psychological Flexibility as a Predictor of Coping Self-Efficacy Among University Students

Öz

Bu çalışmanın genel amacı, baş etme yetkinliği ile psikolojik esneklik arasındaki yordayıcılık ilişkisinin ve adı geçen değişkenlerin cinsiyete göre incelenmesidir. Araştırma, nicel araştırma yönteminin kullanıldığı tarama modelinde tasarlanmıştır. Araştırmanın çalışma grubunu bir devlet üniversitesinde farklı bölümlere devam etmekte olan 1. ve 2. sınıf öğrencileri oluşturmaktadır. Çalışma grubu 72’si kadın, 64’ü erkek olmak üzere toplam 136 kişiden oluşmaktadır. Çalışma grubunun yaş ranjı 17-24 olup, yaş ortalaması 21.42 (Ss: 1.76)’dir. Araştırmada veri toplama aracı olarak Baş Etme Yetkinliği Ölçeği ve Kabul ve Eylem Formu-2 kullanılmıştır. Değişkenler arasında anlamlı bir ilişkinin olup olmadığını belirlemek amacıyla korelasyon katsayısı hesaplanmıştır. Değişkenler arasındaki yordayıcılık ilişkisi basit regresyon analizi ile incelenmiştir. Baş etme yetkinliğinin, baş etme yetkinliğinin alt boyutları olan problem odaklı baş etmenin, sosyal destek alarak baş etmenin ve duygu ve düşünceleri durdurarak baş etmenin, son olarak psikolojik esnekliğin cinsiyet açısından bir farklılık gösterip göstermediği ise T-testi ile incelenmiştir. Elde edilen bulgulara göre, psikolojik esneklik ile baş etme yetkinliği arasında orta düzeyde ve negatif yönde anlamlı bir ilişki bulunmuştur (r =-.41, p<.001) ve psikolojik esneklik baş etme yetkinlik varyansının %16’sını açıklamaktadır. Bir diğer sonuca göre baş etme yetkinliği, baş etme yetkinliğinin alt boyutları ve psikolojik esneklik cinsiyete göre anlamlı bir farklılık bulunmamıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

References

Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and actions. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
Bandura, A. (1992). Exercise of personal agency through the self-efficacy mechanism. In Schwarzer, R. (Eds.), Self-efficacy: Thought control of action, (pp. 3–38). Washington, DC: Hemisphere.
Benight, C. C., Freyaldenhoven, R. W., Hughes, J., Ruiz, J. M., Zoschke, T. A., & Lovallo, W. R. (2000). Coping self-efficacy and psychological distress Following the Oklahoma City Bombing. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 30(7), 1331-1344. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2000.tb02523.x
Benight, C. C., Ironson, G., & Durham, R. L. (1999). Psychometric properties of a hurricane coping self-efficacy measure. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 12(2), 379-386. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024792913301
Benight, C. C., Swift, E., Sanger, J., Smith, A., & Zeppelin, D. (1999). Coping self‐efficacy as a mediator of distress following a natural disaster. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 29(12), 2443-2464. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1999.tb00120.x
Benight, C.C., & Bandura, A. (2004). Social cognitive theory of posttraumatic recovery: The role of perceived self-efficacy. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 42, 1129-1148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2003.08.008
Brinkborg, H., Michanek, J., Hesser, H., & Berglund, G. (2011). Acceptance and commitment therapy for the treatment of stress among social workers: A randomized controlled trial. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 49(6-7), 389-398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2011.03.009
Bond, F. W., Hayes, S. C., Baer, R. A., Carpenter, K. M., Guenole, N., Orcutt, H. K., ... & Zettle, R. D. (2011). Preliminary psychometric properties of the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire–II: A revised measure of psychological inflexibility and experiential avoidance. Behavior therapy, 42(4), 676-688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beth.2011.03.007

Bowling, J., Montanaro, E., Cramer, R. J., Mennicke, A., Wilsey, C. N., Kaniuka, A. R., ... & Heron, K. E. (2021). Gender, sexual orientation, and mental health in the kink community: An application of coping self-efficacy theory. Psychology & Health, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2021.1973001
Burton, C. L., & Bonanno, G. A. (2016). Measuring ability to enhance and suppress emotional expression: The Flexible Regulation of Emotional Expression (FREE) Scale. Psychological assessment, 28(8), 929. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000231
Chesney, M. A., Neilands, T. B., Chambers, D. B., Taylor, J. M., & Folkman, S. (2006). A validity and reliability study of the coping self‐efficacy scale. British journal of health psychology, 11(3), 421-437. https://doi.org/10.1348/135910705X53155
Cobos-Sánchez, L., Flujas-Contreras, J. M., & Becerra, I. G. (2020). Relation between psychological flexibility, emotional intelligence and emotion regulation in adolescence. Current Psychology, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-020-01067-7
Colodro, H., Godoy-Izquierdo, D., & Godoy, J. (2010). Coping self-efficacy in a community-based sample of women and men from the United Kingdom: The impact of sex and health status. Behavioral Medicine, 36(1), 12-23. https://doi.org/10.1080/08964280903521362
Çiçek, E. (2021). Problemli internet kullanımı, psikolojik esneklik süreçleri ve yaşam doyumu ilişkisi. (Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi). İbn Haldun Üniversitesi, İstanbul, Türkiye.
Dahl, J., Wilson, K. G., & Nilsson, A. (2004). Acceptance and commitment therapy and the treatment of persons at risk for long-term disability resulting from stress and pain symptoms: A preliminary randomized trial. Behavior Therapy, 35(4), 785-801. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-7894(04)80020-0
Dawson, D. L., & Golijani-Moghaddam, N. (2020). COVID-19: Psychological flexibility, coping, mental health, and wellbeing in the UK during the pandemic. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 17, 126-134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcbs.2020.07.010
Flaxman, P. E., & Bond, F. W. (2010). A randomised worksite comparison of acceptance and commitment therapy and stress inoculation training. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 48(8), 816-820. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2010.05.004
Ghasemi, A., & Zahediasl, S. (2012). Normality tests for statistical analysis: a guide for non-statisticians. International journal of endocrinology and metabolism, 10(2), 486. https://doi.org/10.5812/ijem.3505
Harris, R. (2016). ACT’i kolay öğrenmek (Çev., F. Yavuz). İstanbul: Litera Yayıncılık.
Hayes, S. C., Luoma, J. B., Bond, F. W., Masuda, A., & Lillis, J. (2006). Acceptance and commitment therapy: Model, processes and outcomes. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 44(1), 1-25. https://doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2005.06.006
Hayes, S. C., Strosahl, K. D., & Wilson, K. G. (2011). Acceptance and commitment therapy: The process and practice of mindful change. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Hayes, S. C., Wilson, K. G., Gifford, E. V., Follette, V. M., & Strosahl, K. (1996). Experiential avoidance and behavioral disorders: A functional dimensional approach to diagnosis and treatment. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 64(6), https://doi.org/1152-1168. 10.1037/0022-006x.64.6.1152
Hulbert-Willams, & Storey, L. (2015). Psychological flexibility correlates with patient-reported outcomes independent of clinical or sociodemographic characteristics. Support Care Center, 24(6), 2513-2521. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-015-3050-9
Karasar, N. (2009). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemi: Kavramlar, ilkeler ve teknikler. Ankara: Nobel Yayın Dağıtım.
Kashdan, T. B., & Rottenberg, J. (2010). Psychological flexibility as a fundamental aspect of health. Clinical psychology review, 30(7), 865-878. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2010.03.001
Karekla, M. &, Panayiotou, G. (2011). Coping and experiential avoidance: Unique or overlapping constructs?. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 42(2), 163-170. https://doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2010.10.002
Kaya, S. ve Çelikkaleli, Ö. (2015). Baş Etme Yetkinliği Ölçeği Kısa formu'nun Psikometrik Özelliklerinin İncelenmesi. 13. Ulusal PDR Kongresi. Mersin, Türkiye.
Koç, G. G. (2020). Bilişsel esneklik ve psikolojik dayanıklılık ile stresle başa çıkma arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi. (Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi). Sakarya Üniversitesi, Sakarya, Türkiye.
Luberto, C. M., Cotton, S., McLeish, A. C., Mingione, C. J., & O’Bryan, E. M. (2014). Mindfulness skills and emotion regulation: The mediating role of coping self-efficacy. Mindfulness, 5(4), 373-380. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-012-0190-6
Masuda, A., & Tully, E. C. (2012). The role of mindfulness and psychological flexibility in somatization, depression, anxiety, and general psychological distress in a nonclinical college sample. Journal of Evidence-Based Complementary & Alternative Medicine, 17(1), 66-71. https://doi: 10.1177/2156587211423400
Mikula, P., Nagyova, I., Krokavcova, M., Vitkova, M., Rosenberger, J., Szilasiova, J., ... & van Dijk, J. P. (2014). Coping and its importance for quality of life in patients with multiple sclerosis. Disability and Rehabilitation, 36(9), 732-736. https://doi.org/10.3109/09638288.2013.808274
Nielsen, E., Sayal, K., & Townsend, E. (2016). Exploring the relationship between experiential avoidance, coping functions and the recency and frequency of self-harm. PLoS One, 11(7). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0159854
Pisanti, R., van der Doef, M., Maes, S., Lombardo, C., Lazzari, D., & Violani, C. (2015). Occupational coping self-efficacy explains distress and well-being in nurses beyond psychosocial job characteristics. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1143. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01143
Rueda, B., & Valls, E. (2020). Is the effect of psychological inflexibility on symptoms and quality of life mediated by coping strategies in patients with mental disorders?. International Journal of Cognitive Therapy, 13(2), 112-126. https://doi/10.1007/s41811-020-00069-4
Schéle, I., Olby, M., Wallin, H., & Holmquist, S. (2021). Self-efficacy, psychological flexibility, and basic needs satisfaction make a difference: recently graduated psychologists at increased or decreased risk for future health issues. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 3729. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.569605
Schwarzer, R. (1994). Optimism, vulnerability, and self-beliefs as health-related cognitions: A systematic overview. Psychology and Health: An International Journal, 9, 161-180. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870449408407475
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Wersebe, H., Lieb, R., Meyer, A. H., Hofer, P., & Gloster, A. T. (2018). The link between stress, well-being, and psychological flexibility during an Acceptance and Commitment Therapy self-help intervention. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 18(1), 60-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijchp.2017.09.002
Vierhaus, M., Lohaus, A., & Schmitz, A. K. (2011). Sex, gender, coping, and self-efficacy: Mediation of sex differences in pain perception in children and adolescents. European Journal of Pain, 15(6), 621-e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpain.2010.11.003
Xu, J., & Roberts, R. E. (2010). The power of positive emotions: It’sa matter of life or death—Subjective well-being and longevity over 28 years in a general population. Health Psychology, 29(1), 9. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016767
Yavuz, F., Ulusoy, S., Iskin, M., Esen, F. B., Burhan, H. S., Karadere, M. E., & Yavuz, N. (2016). Turkish version of Acceptance and Action Questionnaire-II (AAQ-II): A reliability and validity analysis in clinical and non-clinical samples. Klinik Psikofarmakoloji Bülteni-Bulletin of Clinical Psychopharmacology, 26(4), 397-408. https://doi.org/10.5455/bcp.20160223124107

Details

Primary Language

Turkish

Subjects

-

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Sinem Acar ^*
0000-0002-6098-7949
Türkiye

Publication Date

June 30, 2022

Submission Date

December 14, 2021

Acceptance Date

May 26, 2022

Published in Issue

Year 2022 Volume: 13 Number: 3

DOI

https://doi.org/10.19160/e-ijer.1035566

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA69YF56DF

Cite

RIS / Bibtex

APA

Acar, S. (2022). Üniversite Öğrencilerinde Baş Etme Yetkinliğinin Yordayıcısı Olarak Psikolojik Esneklik / Psychological Flexibility as a Predictor of Coping Self-Efficacy Among University Students. E-Uluslararası Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 13(3), 31-45. https://doi.org/10.19160/e-ijer.1035566

Navigating the College Experience: the Role of Character Strengths among Undergraduate Students at a University in Akwa Ibom State, Nigeria

International Journal of Applied Positive Psychology

https://doi.org/10.1007/s41042-025-00266-6

Üniversite Öğrencilerinde Baş Etme Yetkinliğinin Yordayıcısı Olarak Psikolojik Esneklik / Psychological Flexibility as a Predictor of Coping Self-Efficacy Among University Students

Psychological Flexibility as a Predictor of Coping Self-Efficacy Among University Students / Üniversite Öğrencilerinde Baş Etme Yetkinliğinin Yordayıcısı Olarak Psikolojik Esneklik

Abstract

Keywords

Üniversite Öğrencilerinde Baş Etme Yetkinliğinin Yordayıcısı Olarak Psikolojik Esneklik / Psychological Flexibility as a Predictor of Coping Self-Efficacy Among University Students

Öz

Anahtar Kelimeler

References

Details

Primary Language

Subjects

Journal Section

Authors

Publication Date

Submission Date

Acceptance Date

Published in Issue

DOI

IZ

Cite

Cited By

Üniversite Öğrencilerinde Öz Şefkat ile Affetme Arasındaki İlişkide Psikolojik Esnekliğin Düzenleyici Rolü

Psikolojik Esneklik ve Başa Çıkma Stilleri Arasındaki İlişkinin İncelenmesi

Üniversite Öğrencilerinde Kişilerarası Affetme Düzeyi ile Psikolojik Esneklik İlişkisi

Psikiyatri Hemşireliği Dersinin Öğrencilerin Psikolojik Esneklik ve Öz-Anlayış Düzeyine Etkisi

A psychometric evaluation of the coping self-efficacy scale among LGBTQ+ Veterans

Hemşirelik Öğrencilerinde Bilinçli Öz Bakım ve Psikolojik Esneklik Arasındaki İlişki

Navigating the College Experience: the Role of Character Strengths among Undergraduate Students at a University in Akwa Ibom State, Nigeria