Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Year 2022, Volume: 9 Issue: 1, 425 - 442, 01.01.2022

Selin Çenberci

https://doi.org/10.17275/per.22.23.9.1

Abstract

References

  • Akçay, A. O. (2017). Instructional technologies and pre-service mathematics teachers’ selection of technology. Journal of Education and Practice, 8(7), 163-173.
  • Calik-Uzun, S., Kul, U., & Celik, S. (2019). The impact of instructional technology and material design course on pre-service teachers. International Journal of Educational Methodology, 5(3), 451-463. https://doi.org/10.12973/ijem.5.3.451
  • Cameron, T., & Bennett, T. (2010). Learning objects in practice: The integration of reusable learning objects in primary education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 6(41), 897-908. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2010.01133.x
  • Çenberci S., & Yavuz A. (2018). The correlation between the creative thinking tendency of mathematics teacher candidates and their attitudes towards instructional technologies and material design lesson. World Journal of Education, 8(3), 95-106. https://doi.org/10.5430/wje.v8n3p95
  • Demirel, Ö. (2007). Developing Alternative Course Material. Instructional Technologies and Material Design (233-248). (Ed. Ö.Demirel & E. Altun). Ankara: Pegem A Publishing.
  • Demirel, Ö., Seferoğlu, S.S., & Yağcı, E. (2004). Instructional technologies and material development . Ankara: Pegem A Yayıncılık. Dienes, Z.P., & Golding, E.W. (1971). Approach to modern mathematics. New York, NY: Herder & Herder.
  • Duruhan, K., & Şan, İ. (2013). Investigating The Views Of Teacher Candidates About Project Preparing Process Within It&Md Course (Inonu University Case Study), International Journal of Social Science, 6 (7), 379-399. http://dx.doi.org/10.9761/JASSS1843
  • Gündüz, Ş., & Odabaşı, F. (2004). The Importance of Instructional Technologies and Material Development Course at Pre-Service Teacher Education in Information Age. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 3(1), 43-48.
  • Heddens, J.W., & Speer, W.R. (2006). Today’s mathematics: Concepts, methods, and instructional activities. Danvers. MA: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Hollingsworth, P.M., & Hoover, K.H. (1999). Elementary Teaching Methods; (Translated by. Prof. Dr. Tanju Gürkan, Erten Gökçe, Duygu S. Güler). Ankara: Ankara University Publishing, No: 214.
  • Kolburan-Geçer, A. (2010). Experience of Technical Teacher Candidates Towards Teaching Tecnologies and Material Development Course. YYU Journal of Education Faculty, 8(2), 1-25.
  • Kaya, Z. (2005). Instructional technologies and material development. Ankara: Pegem A Publishing.
  • Kazu, H., & Yeşilyurt, E. (2008). Teacher’s Aims of Using Instructional Tools and Materials. Fırat University Journal of Social Sciences, 18(2), 175-188.
  • Koşar, E., Yüksel, S., Özkılıç, R., Avcı, U., Alyaz, Y., & Çiğdem, H. (2003). Instructional technologies and material development. Ankara: Pegem A Publishing.
  • Koparan, T. & Özbey, A. (2018). Examination of the Views of Prospective Math Teachers on the Process of Developing and Using Concrete Materials. Karaelmas Journal of Educational Sciences, 6, 277-290.
  • Kul, U., Celik, S., & Aksu, Z. (2018). The impact of educational material use on mathematics achievement: A meta- analysis. International Journal of Instruction, 11(4), 303-324. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.11420a.
  • Mamur-Yılmaz, E., & Bilici, S. (2009). The Effects of the Process of Teaching Material Design on the Psy-homotor Domain Attainments of Preservice Art Teachers. The Black Sea Journal of Social Sciences, 9, 353-382.
  • Mamur-Yılmaz, E., & Bilici, S. (2015). Instructional Technologies and Materials Used by Visual Art Teacher. The Black Sea Journal of Social Sciences Hüseyin Hüsnü Tekışık Special Issue, 2(7), 51-65.
  • Mc Alpine, L., & Weston, C. (1994). “The Attributes of Instructional Materials”, Performance Improvement Quarterly, Spring: 19–30. Özer, Ö., & Tunca, N. (2014). The Opinion Of Pre-Service Teachers Towards Preparating and Using of Materials. Route Educational and Social Science Journal, 1(3), 214-229.
  • Piaget, J. (1971). Biology and knowledge. Chicago, Illinois: The University of Chicago Press.
  • Powers, R., & Blubaugh, W. (2005). Technology in mathematics education: Preparing teachers for the future. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 5(3-4), 254-270. Retrieved from http://www.citejournal.org/vol5/iss3/mathematics/article1.cfm.
  • Skemp, R.R. (1987). The psychology of learning mathematics. NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale.
  • Şahin, T.Y., & Yıldırım, S. (2004). Instructional technologies and material development. Ankara: Anı Publishing.
  • Şahin, M. (2014). The Analysis of The Views of Teachers Related to The Functions of Teaching Materials During The Teaching-Learning Process. Kastamonu Education Journal, 23(3), 995-1012.
  • Tezer, M. (2008). Views Of The Instructors and Students on Computer Based Video Programs As An Educational Material. IETC (The International Educational Technology Conference). Eskişehir, Turkey.
  • Waits, B. K., & Demana F. (2000). Calculators in mathematics teaching and learning: Past, present, and future. In M. J. Burke & F. R. Curcio (Eds.), Learning mathematics for a new century (pp. 51–66), Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
  • Yanpar, T. (2005). Instructional technologies and material development. Ankara: Anı Publishing.
  • Yanpar T., Koray, Ö., Parmaksız, R.Ş., & Arslan, A. (2006). Investigation of Hands-On and Technology Based Materials Prepared By Preservice Teachers With Respect to the Dimensions of Creativity. Educational Administration – Theory and Practice, 45, 129-148.
  • Yalın, H.İ. (2003). Instructional technologies and material development. Ankara: Nobel Publishing.
  • Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2008). Qualitative research methods in the social sciences. Ankara: Anı Publishing.
  • Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2005). Qualitative research methods in the social sciences. (Fifth edition). Ankara: Seçkin Publishing.
  • YÖK (1998). Council of Higher Education Faculty of Education Teacher Training Undergraduate Programs Booklet. Retrieved from https://www.yok.gov.tr/kurumsal/idari-birimler/egitim-ogretim-dairesi/ogretmen-yetiştirme.
  • YÖK (2018). New Teacher Training Undergraduate Program. Retrieved from https://www.yok.gov.tr/kurumsal/idari-birimler/egitim-ogretim-dairesi/yeni-ogretmen-yetistirme-lisans-programlari.

Preservice Teachers' Material Preparation Knowledge and Points to be considered While Developing the Material

Year 2022, Volume: 9 Issue: 1, 425 - 442, 01.01.2022

Selin Çenberci

https://doi.org/10.17275/per.22.23.9.1

Abstract

This study aimed to analyze knowledge of preservice teachers on material preparation process for mathematics lesson and their opinions about the points to be considered while developing material. In this context, in addition, it was intended to determine the preservice teachers' differences to use their knowledge on material preparation while developing materials in the course. To that end, 39 preservice teachers in total who studied in Elementary and Secondary School Mathematics Teaching Program at a state university in Southern Anatolia Region in the Fall semester of 2019-2020 academic year and who received "Instructional Technologies" and "Material Design in Mathematics Teaching lessons" were addressed two different open-ended questions in writing. Data obtained as a result of the applications performed were analyzed through content analysis. At this stage, the number of answers given by the students to the open-ended questions was determined and thus qualitative data were quantified. Then, frequency analysis and categorical analysis methods were noted in quantified data. At the end of the study, preservice mathematics teachers’ both knowledge on material preparation process and points to be considered while developing material were gathered under three different sub-themes which are material use, content/design, and student. However, it was observed that preservice teachers focused mostly on content/design of the material among these sub-themes. It was found that priority order for the sub-themes material use and student varied when looked both at knowledge on material preparation process and points that should be taken into account during material developing. It is seen that there are some differences in the priorities of the use of pre-service mathematics teachers' knowledge on material preparation while developing materials.

Keywords

Mathematics Mathematics Lesson Materials for mathematics lesson Material design Preservice mathematics teacher

References

  • Akçay, A. O. (2017). Instructional technologies and pre-service mathematics teachers’ selection of technology. Journal of Education and Practice, 8(7), 163-173.
  • Calik-Uzun, S., Kul, U., & Celik, S. (2019). The impact of instructional technology and material design course on pre-service teachers. International Journal of Educational Methodology, 5(3), 451-463. https://doi.org/10.12973/ijem.5.3.451
  • Cameron, T., & Bennett, T. (2010). Learning objects in practice: The integration of reusable learning objects in primary education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 6(41), 897-908. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2010.01133.x
  • Çenberci S., & Yavuz A. (2018). The correlation between the creative thinking tendency of mathematics teacher candidates and their attitudes towards instructional technologies and material design lesson. World Journal of Education, 8(3), 95-106. https://doi.org/10.5430/wje.v8n3p95
  • Demirel, Ö. (2007). Developing Alternative Course Material. Instructional Technologies and Material Design (233-248). (Ed. Ö.Demirel & E. Altun). Ankara: Pegem A Publishing.
  • Demirel, Ö., Seferoğlu, S.S., & Yağcı, E. (2004). Instructional technologies and material development . Ankara: Pegem A Yayıncılık. Dienes, Z.P., & Golding, E.W. (1971). Approach to modern mathematics. New York, NY: Herder & Herder.
  • Duruhan, K., & Şan, İ. (2013). Investigating The Views Of Teacher Candidates About Project Preparing Process Within It&Md Course (Inonu University Case Study), International Journal of Social Science, 6 (7), 379-399. http://dx.doi.org/10.9761/JASSS1843
  • Gündüz, Ş., & Odabaşı, F. (2004). The Importance of Instructional Technologies and Material Development Course at Pre-Service Teacher Education in Information Age. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 3(1), 43-48.
  • Heddens, J.W., & Speer, W.R. (2006). Today’s mathematics: Concepts, methods, and instructional activities. Danvers. MA: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Hollingsworth, P.M., & Hoover, K.H. (1999). Elementary Teaching Methods; (Translated by. Prof. Dr. Tanju Gürkan, Erten Gökçe, Duygu S. Güler). Ankara: Ankara University Publishing, No: 214.
  • Kolburan-Geçer, A. (2010). Experience of Technical Teacher Candidates Towards Teaching Tecnologies and Material Development Course. YYU Journal of Education Faculty, 8(2), 1-25.
  • Kaya, Z. (2005). Instructional technologies and material development. Ankara: Pegem A Publishing.
  • Kazu, H., & Yeşilyurt, E. (2008). Teacher’s Aims of Using Instructional Tools and Materials. Fırat University Journal of Social Sciences, 18(2), 175-188.
  • Koşar, E., Yüksel, S., Özkılıç, R., Avcı, U., Alyaz, Y., & Çiğdem, H. (2003). Instructional technologies and material development. Ankara: Pegem A Publishing.
  • Koparan, T. & Özbey, A. (2018). Examination of the Views of Prospective Math Teachers on the Process of Developing and Using Concrete Materials. Karaelmas Journal of Educational Sciences, 6, 277-290.
  • Kul, U., Celik, S., & Aksu, Z. (2018). The impact of educational material use on mathematics achievement: A meta- analysis. International Journal of Instruction, 11(4), 303-324. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.11420a.
  • Mamur-Yılmaz, E., & Bilici, S. (2009). The Effects of the Process of Teaching Material Design on the Psy-homotor Domain Attainments of Preservice Art Teachers. The Black Sea Journal of Social Sciences, 9, 353-382.
  • Mamur-Yılmaz, E., & Bilici, S. (2015). Instructional Technologies and Materials Used by Visual Art Teacher. The Black Sea Journal of Social Sciences Hüseyin Hüsnü Tekışık Special Issue, 2(7), 51-65.
  • Mc Alpine, L., & Weston, C. (1994). “The Attributes of Instructional Materials”, Performance Improvement Quarterly, Spring: 19–30. Özer, Ö., & Tunca, N. (2014). The Opinion Of Pre-Service Teachers Towards Preparating and Using of Materials. Route Educational and Social Science Journal, 1(3), 214-229.
  • Piaget, J. (1971). Biology and knowledge. Chicago, Illinois: The University of Chicago Press.
  • Powers, R., & Blubaugh, W. (2005). Technology in mathematics education: Preparing teachers for the future. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 5(3-4), 254-270. Retrieved from http://www.citejournal.org/vol5/iss3/mathematics/article1.cfm.
  • Skemp, R.R. (1987). The psychology of learning mathematics. NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale.
  • Şahin, T.Y., & Yıldırım, S. (2004). Instructional technologies and material development. Ankara: Anı Publishing.
  • Şahin, M. (2014). The Analysis of The Views of Teachers Related to The Functions of Teaching Materials During The Teaching-Learning Process. Kastamonu Education Journal, 23(3), 995-1012.
  • Tezer, M. (2008). Views Of The Instructors and Students on Computer Based Video Programs As An Educational Material. IETC (The International Educational Technology Conference). Eskişehir, Turkey.
  • Waits, B. K., & Demana F. (2000). Calculators in mathematics teaching and learning: Past, present, and future. In M. J. Burke & F. R. Curcio (Eds.), Learning mathematics for a new century (pp. 51–66), Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
  • Yanpar, T. (2005). Instructional technologies and material development. Ankara: Anı Publishing.
  • Yanpar T., Koray, Ö., Parmaksız, R.Ş., & Arslan, A. (2006). Investigation of Hands-On and Technology Based Materials Prepared By Preservice Teachers With Respect to the Dimensions of Creativity. Educational Administration – Theory and Practice, 45, 129-148.
  • Yalın, H.İ. (2003). Instructional technologies and material development. Ankara: Nobel Publishing.
  • Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2008). Qualitative research methods in the social sciences. Ankara: Anı Publishing.
  • Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2005). Qualitative research methods in the social sciences. (Fifth edition). Ankara: Seçkin Publishing.
  • YÖK (1998). Council of Higher Education Faculty of Education Teacher Training Undergraduate Programs Booklet. Retrieved from https://www.yok.gov.tr/kurumsal/idari-birimler/egitim-ogretim-dairesi/ogretmen-yetiştirme.
  • YÖK (2018). New Teacher Training Undergraduate Program. Retrieved from https://www.yok.gov.tr/kurumsal/idari-birimler/egitim-ogretim-dairesi/yeni-ogretmen-yetistirme-lisans-programlari.
There are 33 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Other Fields of Education
Journal Section Research Articles
Authors

Selin Çenberci 0000-0003-4025-7823

Publication Date January 1, 2022
Acceptance Date July 5, 2021
Published in Issue Year 2022 Volume: 9 Issue: 1

Cite

APA Çenberci, S. (2022). Preservice Teachers’ Material Preparation Knowledge and Points to be considered While Developing the Material. Participatory Educational Research, 9(1), 425-442. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.22.23.9.1
 Download Cover Image

27707 15007  14998  150021500015005 1516417153

150621500415006   Creative Commons Lisansı  Creative Commons Atıf 4.0 International Lisance