Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

RELATIONSHIP AMONG EFFICACY, STRATEGY USE AND PROFICIENCY: CASE OF LISTENING IN AN EFL CLASSROOM

Yıl 2017, Cilt: 2 Sayı: 3, 133 - 150, 30.09.2017

Öz

Among four skills in foreign language
learning, listening has been the least researched one, mostly because there are
various cognitive and affective factors to consider. This study only focused on
strategy use (cognitive) and efficacy beliefs (affective) of the students to
investigate the relationship between listening proficiency, efficacy and
strategy use of EFL learners. In accordance with quantitative research method,
listening efficacy and listening strategy use questionnaires together with a
listening comprehension test were used at the outset of a 14-week listening
course, which is one of the mainstream courses in the ELT department. The
results underline a positive correlation among the three variables.

Kaynakça

  • Bernhardt, S. (1997). Self-efficacy and second language learning. The NCLRC Language Resource, 1(5)
  • Bialystok, E., & Fröhlich, M. (1978). Variables of classroom achievement in second language learning. The Modern Language Journal, 62(7), 327-336.
  • Brown D. (1987). Principles of Language Learning and Teaching. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
  • Chamot, A. U., & O'malley, J. M. (1987). The cognitive academic language learning approach: A bridge to the mainstream. TESOL quarterly, 21(2), 227-249.
  • Chastain, K. (1988). Developing second language skills. Theory and practice, 3.
  • Chen, Huei-Yu & Hasson, Deborah J. (2007). The Relationship between EFL Learners‟ Self-efficacy Beliefs and English Performance. Retrieved June, 2008 from http://www.coe.fsu.edu/core/abstracts/mse/Huei-Yu_Chen_Abstract.doc
  • Chen, K. T. (2010). University EFL Learners’ Awareness of Metacognitive Listening Comprehension Strategies in Taiwan. 2010 Cross-University International Conference on English Teaching, Taipei, Taiwan, May, 21, 2010
  • Ehrman, M. E. (1996). Understanding second language learning difficulties. Sage.
  • Goh, C. C. (1998). How ESL learners with different listening abilities use comprehension strategies and tactics. Language Teaching Research, 2(2), 124-147.
  • Goh, C., & Taib, Y. (2006). Metacognitive instruction in listening for young learners. ELT Journal, 60(3), 222-232.
  • Graham, S. (2003). Learner strategies and advanced level listening comprehension. Language Learning Journal, 28(1), 64-69.
  • Graham, S. (2007). Learner strategies and self-efficacy: making the connection. Language Learning Journal, 35, 81-93.
  • Graham, S. (2011) Self-efficacy and academic listening. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 10(2). pp. 113-117.
  • Lambert, W. E. (1963). Psychological approaches to the study of language. The Modern Language Journal, 47(2), 51-62.
  • Lynch, T. (2011). Academic listening in the 21st century: Reviewing a decade of research. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 10(2), 79-88.
  • Magogwe, Joel Mokuedi & Oliver, Rhonda. (2007). The relationship between language learning strategies, proficiency, age and self-efficacy beliefs: A study of language learners in Botswana. System, 35, 338-352.
  • Mendelsohn, D. J., & Rubin, J. (1995). A guide for the teaching of second language listening (pp. 132-150). San Diego, CA: Dominie Press.
  • McKenna, M. C., Stratton, B. D., Grindler, M. C., & Jenkins, S. J. (1995). Differential effects of whole language and traditional instruction on reading attitudes. Journal of Reading Behavior, 27(1), 19-44.
  • Nunan, D. (1998). Approaches to teaching listening in language classroom. In proceedings of the 1997 Korea TESOL Conference. Taejon, Korea: KOTESOL. O'malley, J. M., Chamot, A. U., STEWNER‐MANZANARES, G. L. O. R. I. A., Russo, R. P., & Küpper, L. (1985). Learning strategy applications with students of English as a second language. TESOL quarterly, 19(3), 557-584.
  • O'malley J. M., Chamot, A. U., & Küpper, L. (1989). Listening comprehension strategies in second language acquisition. Applied linguistics, 10(4), 418-437.
  • Pajares, F. (2000). Self-efficacy beliefs and current directions in self-efficacy research. Retrieved June, 2008 from http://www.emory.edu/EDUCATION/mfp/effpage.html.
  • Rahimi, A., & Abedini, A. (2009). The interface between EFL learners’ self-efficacy concerning listening comprehension and listening proficiency. Novitas-Royal, 3(1), 14-28.
  • Read, J. (2002). The use of interactive input in EAP listening assessment. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 1(2), 105-119.
  • Rubin, J. (1994). A review of second language listening comprehension research. The Modern Language Journal, 78(2), 199-221
  • Siew, L. & Wong, M. (2005). Language Learning Strategies and Language Self- Efficacy: Investigating the Relationship in Malaysia. Eric Journal, 36(3), 245- 269.
  • Skehan, P. (1989). Language testing part II. Language Teaching, 22(1), 1-13.
  • Vandergrift, L. (1997). The comprehension strategies of second language (French) listeners: A descriptive study. Foreign language annals, 30(3), 387-409.
  • Vandergrift, L. (1999). Facilitating second language listening comprehension: Acquiring successful strategies. ELT Journal, 53(3), 168-176.
  • Vandergrift, L. (2003). Orchestrating strategy use: Toward a model of the skilled second language listener. Language learning, 53(3), 463-496.
  • Vandergrift, L. (2006). Second language listening: listening ability or language proficiency?. The Modern Language Journal, 90(1), 6-18.
  • Wenden, A. and Rubin, J. 1987. Learner Strategies in Language Learning. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Yıl 2017, Cilt: 2 Sayı: 3, 133 - 150, 30.09.2017

Öz

Kaynakça

  • Bernhardt, S. (1997). Self-efficacy and second language learning. The NCLRC Language Resource, 1(5)
  • Bialystok, E., & Fröhlich, M. (1978). Variables of classroom achievement in second language learning. The Modern Language Journal, 62(7), 327-336.
  • Brown D. (1987). Principles of Language Learning and Teaching. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
  • Chamot, A. U., & O'malley, J. M. (1987). The cognitive academic language learning approach: A bridge to the mainstream. TESOL quarterly, 21(2), 227-249.
  • Chastain, K. (1988). Developing second language skills. Theory and practice, 3.
  • Chen, Huei-Yu & Hasson, Deborah J. (2007). The Relationship between EFL Learners‟ Self-efficacy Beliefs and English Performance. Retrieved June, 2008 from http://www.coe.fsu.edu/core/abstracts/mse/Huei-Yu_Chen_Abstract.doc
  • Chen, K. T. (2010). University EFL Learners’ Awareness of Metacognitive Listening Comprehension Strategies in Taiwan. 2010 Cross-University International Conference on English Teaching, Taipei, Taiwan, May, 21, 2010
  • Ehrman, M. E. (1996). Understanding second language learning difficulties. Sage.
  • Goh, C. C. (1998). How ESL learners with different listening abilities use comprehension strategies and tactics. Language Teaching Research, 2(2), 124-147.
  • Goh, C., & Taib, Y. (2006). Metacognitive instruction in listening for young learners. ELT Journal, 60(3), 222-232.
  • Graham, S. (2003). Learner strategies and advanced level listening comprehension. Language Learning Journal, 28(1), 64-69.
  • Graham, S. (2007). Learner strategies and self-efficacy: making the connection. Language Learning Journal, 35, 81-93.
  • Graham, S. (2011) Self-efficacy and academic listening. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 10(2). pp. 113-117.
  • Lambert, W. E. (1963). Psychological approaches to the study of language. The Modern Language Journal, 47(2), 51-62.
  • Lynch, T. (2011). Academic listening in the 21st century: Reviewing a decade of research. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 10(2), 79-88.
  • Magogwe, Joel Mokuedi & Oliver, Rhonda. (2007). The relationship between language learning strategies, proficiency, age and self-efficacy beliefs: A study of language learners in Botswana. System, 35, 338-352.
  • Mendelsohn, D. J., & Rubin, J. (1995). A guide for the teaching of second language listening (pp. 132-150). San Diego, CA: Dominie Press.
  • McKenna, M. C., Stratton, B. D., Grindler, M. C., & Jenkins, S. J. (1995). Differential effects of whole language and traditional instruction on reading attitudes. Journal of Reading Behavior, 27(1), 19-44.
  • Nunan, D. (1998). Approaches to teaching listening in language classroom. In proceedings of the 1997 Korea TESOL Conference. Taejon, Korea: KOTESOL. O'malley, J. M., Chamot, A. U., STEWNER‐MANZANARES, G. L. O. R. I. A., Russo, R. P., & Küpper, L. (1985). Learning strategy applications with students of English as a second language. TESOL quarterly, 19(3), 557-584.
  • O'malley J. M., Chamot, A. U., & Küpper, L. (1989). Listening comprehension strategies in second language acquisition. Applied linguistics, 10(4), 418-437.
  • Pajares, F. (2000). Self-efficacy beliefs and current directions in self-efficacy research. Retrieved June, 2008 from http://www.emory.edu/EDUCATION/mfp/effpage.html.
  • Rahimi, A., & Abedini, A. (2009). The interface between EFL learners’ self-efficacy concerning listening comprehension and listening proficiency. Novitas-Royal, 3(1), 14-28.
  • Read, J. (2002). The use of interactive input in EAP listening assessment. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 1(2), 105-119.
  • Rubin, J. (1994). A review of second language listening comprehension research. The Modern Language Journal, 78(2), 199-221
  • Siew, L. & Wong, M. (2005). Language Learning Strategies and Language Self- Efficacy: Investigating the Relationship in Malaysia. Eric Journal, 36(3), 245- 269.
  • Skehan, P. (1989). Language testing part II. Language Teaching, 22(1), 1-13.
  • Vandergrift, L. (1997). The comprehension strategies of second language (French) listeners: A descriptive study. Foreign language annals, 30(3), 387-409.
  • Vandergrift, L. (1999). Facilitating second language listening comprehension: Acquiring successful strategies. ELT Journal, 53(3), 168-176.
  • Vandergrift, L. (2003). Orchestrating strategy use: Toward a model of the skilled second language listener. Language learning, 53(3), 463-496.
  • Vandergrift, L. (2006). Second language listening: listening ability or language proficiency?. The Modern Language Journal, 90(1), 6-18.
  • Wenden, A. and Rubin, J. 1987. Learner Strategies in Language Learning. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Toplam 31 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Bölüm Articles
Yazarlar

Görsev Sönmez

Büşranur Durmaz Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi 30 Eylül 2017
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2017 Cilt: 2 Sayı: 3

Kaynak Göster

APA Sönmez, G., & Durmaz, B. (2017). RELATIONSHIP AMONG EFFICACY, STRATEGY USE AND PROFICIENCY: CASE OF LISTENING IN AN EFL CLASSROOM. Turkish Online Journal of English Language Teaching, 2(3), 133-150.
AMA Sönmez G, Durmaz B. RELATIONSHIP AMONG EFFICACY, STRATEGY USE AND PROFICIENCY: CASE OF LISTENING IN AN EFL CLASSROOM. TOJELT. Eylül 2017;2(3):133-150.
Chicago Sönmez, Görsev, ve Büşranur Durmaz. “RELATIONSHIP AMONG EFFICACY, STRATEGY USE AND PROFICIENCY: CASE OF LISTENING IN AN EFL CLASSROOM”. Turkish Online Journal of English Language Teaching 2, sy. 3 (Eylül 2017): 133-50.
EndNote Sönmez G, Durmaz B (01 Eylül 2017) RELATIONSHIP AMONG EFFICACY, STRATEGY USE AND PROFICIENCY: CASE OF LISTENING IN AN EFL CLASSROOM. Turkish Online Journal of English Language Teaching 2 3 133–150.
IEEE G. Sönmez ve B. Durmaz, “RELATIONSHIP AMONG EFFICACY, STRATEGY USE AND PROFICIENCY: CASE OF LISTENING IN AN EFL CLASSROOM”, TOJELT, c. 2, sy. 3, ss. 133–150, 2017.
ISNAD Sönmez, Görsev - Durmaz, Büşranur. “RELATIONSHIP AMONG EFFICACY, STRATEGY USE AND PROFICIENCY: CASE OF LISTENING IN AN EFL CLASSROOM”. Turkish Online Journal of English Language Teaching 2/3 (Eylül 2017), 133-150.
JAMA Sönmez G, Durmaz B. RELATIONSHIP AMONG EFFICACY, STRATEGY USE AND PROFICIENCY: CASE OF LISTENING IN AN EFL CLASSROOM. TOJELT. 2017;2:133–150.
MLA Sönmez, Görsev ve Büşranur Durmaz. “RELATIONSHIP AMONG EFFICACY, STRATEGY USE AND PROFICIENCY: CASE OF LISTENING IN AN EFL CLASSROOM”. Turkish Online Journal of English Language Teaching, c. 2, sy. 3, 2017, ss. 133-50.
Vancouver Sönmez G, Durmaz B. RELATIONSHIP AMONG EFFICACY, STRATEGY USE AND PROFICIENCY: CASE OF LISTENING IN AN EFL CLASSROOM. TOJELT. 2017;2(3):133-50.