Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

City, Identity and Civilization in the Eyes of Teacher Candidates

Yıl 2022, Cilt: 5 Sayı: 2, 171 - 190, 30.10.2022
https://doi.org/10.53047/josse.1115124

Öz

Bu çalışma, Yıldız Teknik Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesinde öğrenim gören öğretmen adaylarının kent, kimlik ve medeniyete ilişkin görüşlerini ve İstanbul kent kimliği algılarını ortaya çıkarmayı amaçlamaktadır. Araştırmanın çalışma grubunu Yıldız Teknik Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesinde farklı bölümlerde ve kademelerde eğitimlerine devam eden öğretmen adayları oluşturmaktadır. Verilerin toplanmasında araştırmacılar tarafından geliştirilen ve Google Formlar aracılığıyla öğretmen adaylarına ulaştırılan elektronik görüşme formu kullanılmıştır. Elde edilen veriler nitel araştırma yöntemlerinden fenomenolojiye uygun olarak analiz edilmiş ve içerik analizi ile sınıflandırılarak yorumlanmıştır. Öğretmen adaylarının İstanbul'dan önce yaşadıkları yerleşimlerin ardından İstanbul'daki kent kimliği algılarının detayları, geçmişi ve İstanbul'un öğretmen kimliğine katkıları ele alınmıştır. İstanbul'da yaşamadan önceki ve sonraki algılar karşılaştırılmış ve değerlendirilmiştir. Araştırma bulgularına göre İstanbul; katılımcılara etnik çeşitliliğe aşina olma, özgüven kazanma, millî değerleri sergileme, hoşgörülü olma, şehrin sunduğu fırsatların farkında olma ve farklı kültürlerden insanlarla tanışırken empati kurma gibi nitelikler kazandırmıştır. özellikler. Katılımcılar, İstanbul'a ilişkin metaforik algılarını farklı imgelerle beş farklı temada (deniz, tarih-kültür-medeniyet, metropol yaşamı, duygu ve diğerleri) ifade etmişlerdir. Öğretmen adaylarının İstanbul'da yaşayarak ve şehir hayatını deneyimleyerek daha geniş, kapsamlı ve özgün bir kimlik kazandıkları belirlenmiştir. Bu kazanımların gelecekte öğretmen adaylarının yetiştirecekleri öğrencilere kültürel ve nitelikli katkılar sağlayacağı düşünülmektedir.

Kaynakça

  • Acar, İ., Erdoğan, S., Gedikli, A., Ergen, A., Güzel, A., Arslan, F. P. & Tenekeci, M. E. (2015). Şanlıurfa kimliği çalıştayı raporu [Workshop result report of Şanlıurfa identity].
  • Adıyaman, K. (2008). Kentleşme sürecinde Türkiye ve kent kimliği [Turkey and Urban Identity in urbanization process], Bahçeşehir University Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences Unpublished Master Thesis, Istanbul.
  • Aliağaoğlu, A. and Abdullah, U. (2018). Erzurum city ıdentity in logos: A study of interpretive understanding. Journal of Atatürk University Social Sciences Institute, 22(4), 2357-2379.
  • Atik, M. (2014). Kentsel yaşam kalitesi ve kent kimliği bağlamında Istanbul’daki yenileme uygulamaları üzerine bir değerlendirme; Sulukule örneği. [Unpublished Master Thesis]. Bahçeşehir University.
  • Ayvalıoğlu, N. (1993). Istanbul in the minds of Istanbulites: Examining the cognitive ımage of Istanbul. Psychology Studies, 19, 5-50.
  • Baker, C., Wuest, J. & Stern, P.N. (1992). Method slurring: the grounded theory/ phenomenology example. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 17, 1355-1360.
  • Balcı, A. (2011). Sosyal bilimlerde araştırma [research in social sciences]. Pegem A.
  • Baltacı, A. (2019). Qualitative research process: How is a qualitative research done?. Journal of Ahi Evran University Institute of Social Sciences, 5(2), 368-388.
  • Baş, T. ve Akturan, U. (2008). Nitel araştırma yöntemleri NVivo 7.0 ile nitel veri analizi. (1. baskı). Seçkin Publishing.
  • Bengtsson, M. (2016). How to plan and perform a qualitative study using content analysis. NursingPlus Open, 2, 8-14.
  • Birol, G. (2007). An evaluation on the identity of a city and the Kervansaray Hotel]. Journal of Arkitekt, 514 (1), 46-54.
  • Crabtree, B. F. & Miller, W. L. (1999). Doing qualitative research. Sage.
  • Çelik, C., (2012). From “The Urban of Islam” to “Urbanized Islam”: the Codes of Civilisation in the city from the point of historical experience and sociological practise, Mill ve Nihal, 9 (3), 137- 156.
  • Demir Bayraktar, H. (2017). Istanbul as a city in huzur and its urban ıdentity and Istanbulites. Journal of International Social Research, 10 (54).
  • Francis, D.,& Le Roux, A. (2011). Teaching for social justice education: the intersection between identity, critical agency, and social justice education. South African Journal of Education, 31(3), 299-311.
  • Glesne C. (2012). Nitel araştırmaya giriş (1. Baskı) [Introduction to Qualitative Research (1st Edition)], (Trans.) Ali Ersoy ve Pelin Yalçınoğlu, Anı Publishing.
  • Gökalp, Z. (1976). Türkleşmek, islamlaşmak, muasırlaşmak [Turkification, Islamization, modernization]. Ötüken Publication.
  • İlgar, E. (2008). Kent kimliği ve kentsel değişimin kent kimliği boyutu: Eskişehir örneği. [Master Thesis].Anadolu University.
  • Kafesoğlu, İ. (2005). Türk milli kültürü [Turkish national culture]. Ötüken Publication.
  • Kalın, İ. (2010). Worldview, conception of existence and the idea of order: an introduction to the concept of civilization. Dîvân: Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, (29), 1-61.
  • Karaaslan, Ç. (2010). Tarihi kentlerde kimliksizleşme sorunu ve bir çözüm yolu olarak kentsel canlandırma projeleri [Unpublished Master Thesis ]. Ankara University.
  • Kaypak, Ş. (2010). Examination of Antakya in terms of urban ıdentity. Journal of Mustafa Kemal University Institute of Social Sciences, 7 14), 373-392.
  • Kılıçkaya Boğ, E. E. (2019). City identity and font relationship. Dumlupınar University Journal of Social Sciences, (61), 109-121.
  • Kızılay, Ş. E. (2010) Ufkî Şehir [Horizon City]. Z Journal.
  • Korthagen, F. A. (2004). In search of the essence of a good teacher: Towards a more holistic approach in teacher education. Teaching and teacher education, 20(1), 77-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2003.10.002
  • Miles, M. B. and Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Sage.
  • Ökten, C. E. (2021). Medeniyetimizin Sembolü İstanbul, Şehir ve Düşünce, 17, 24-31.
  • Ökten, S. (2012). Yahya Kemal's Istanbul and its sequel. Ötüken Publication.
  • Ökten, S. (2014). Istanbul School. 1453 Istanbul Culture and Art Magazine, 20, ss.12-18.
  • Özsezer, M. S. B.,& Saban, A. İ. (2021). Towards the development of teachers for the future. South African Journal of Education, 41(2).
  • Rossi, A. (1999). The architecture of the city, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
  • Sağdıç, M. (2014). Analysis of university students' perceptions of Istanbul in terms of city image. Electronic Turkish Studies, 9 (2).
  • Sennett, R. (2002). Skin and Stone Body and City in Western Civilization. Trans. Birkan, T., Metis..
  • Starks, H. & Trinidad, S. B. (2007). Choose your method: A comparison of phenomenology, discourse analysis, and grounded theory. Qualitative Health Research, 17(10), 1372-1380.
  • Şahin, N. (2010). Examination of Urban Identity and the Process of Change in the Case of Kayseri City. Mimar Sinan Fine Arts University, Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, Unpublished Master Thesis, Istanbul.
  • Tanpınar, A. H. (1960). Five Cities. Dergâh Publications.
  • Tanpınar, A. H. (2009). Serenity. Dergâh Publications, 17th edition.
  • Tavşancıl, E. & Aslan, E. (2001). Content analysis and application examples for oral, written and other materials. Istanbul: Epsilon.
  • Topçu, K. D. (2011). A Study on Urban Identity: The Case of Konya. International Journal of Human Sciences, 8(2), 1050-1072.
  • Tuan, Y. (1976). Humanistic Geography. Annals of Association of American Geographers, 66(2), pp. 277-292.
  • Ulu, A. ve Karakoç, İ. (2004). The effect of urban change on urban identity. Journal of Planning, 3(29), 59-66.
  • Wimpenny, P.,& Gass, J. (2000). Interviewing in phenomenology and grounded theory: is there a difference?. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 31(6), 1485-1492.
  • Yıldırım, M. (2014). City Identity and Religion in the Context of Sacred Space Perception. Çukurova University Journal of Social Sciences Institute, 23 (1) 133-142.

City, Identity and Civilization in the Eyes of Teacher Candidates

Yıl 2022, Cilt: 5 Sayı: 2, 171 - 190, 30.10.2022
https://doi.org/10.53047/josse.1115124

Öz

This study aims to reveal the views of pre-service teachers studying at Yıldız Technical University Education Faculty about the city, identity and civilization and their perceptions of Istanbul urban identity. The study group of the research consists of teacher candidates who continue their education in different departments and levels at Yıldız Technical University Faculty of Education. An electronic interview form developed by the researchers and delivered to teacher candidates via Google Forms was used to collect the data. The data obtained were analyzed in accordance with phenomenology, one of the qualitative research methods, and interpreted by classifying with content analysis. The details of the pre-service teachers' perceptions of urban identity in Istanbul, after the settlements they lived in before Istanbul, and their contributions to Istanbul's teacher identity are discussed. Perceptions before and after living in Istanbul were compared and evaluated. According to the research findings, Istanbul; The participants gained qualifications such as being familiar with ethnic diversity, gaining self-confidence, exhibiting national values, being tolerant, being aware of the opportunities offered by the city, and empathizing when meeting people from different cultures. features. Participants expressed their metaphorical perceptions of Istanbul in five different themes (sea, history-culture-civilization, metropolitan life, emotion and others) with different images. It was determined that pre-service teachers gained a wider, comprehensive and unique identity by living in Istanbul and experiencing the city life. It is thought that these gains will provide cultural and qualified contributions to the students that prospective teachers will train in the future.

Kaynakça

  • Acar, İ., Erdoğan, S., Gedikli, A., Ergen, A., Güzel, A., Arslan, F. P. & Tenekeci, M. E. (2015). Şanlıurfa kimliği çalıştayı raporu [Workshop result report of Şanlıurfa identity].
  • Adıyaman, K. (2008). Kentleşme sürecinde Türkiye ve kent kimliği [Turkey and Urban Identity in urbanization process], Bahçeşehir University Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences Unpublished Master Thesis, Istanbul.
  • Aliağaoğlu, A. and Abdullah, U. (2018). Erzurum city ıdentity in logos: A study of interpretive understanding. Journal of Atatürk University Social Sciences Institute, 22(4), 2357-2379.
  • Atik, M. (2014). Kentsel yaşam kalitesi ve kent kimliği bağlamında Istanbul’daki yenileme uygulamaları üzerine bir değerlendirme; Sulukule örneği. [Unpublished Master Thesis]. Bahçeşehir University.
  • Ayvalıoğlu, N. (1993). Istanbul in the minds of Istanbulites: Examining the cognitive ımage of Istanbul. Psychology Studies, 19, 5-50.
  • Baker, C., Wuest, J. & Stern, P.N. (1992). Method slurring: the grounded theory/ phenomenology example. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 17, 1355-1360.
  • Balcı, A. (2011). Sosyal bilimlerde araştırma [research in social sciences]. Pegem A.
  • Baltacı, A. (2019). Qualitative research process: How is a qualitative research done?. Journal of Ahi Evran University Institute of Social Sciences, 5(2), 368-388.
  • Baş, T. ve Akturan, U. (2008). Nitel araştırma yöntemleri NVivo 7.0 ile nitel veri analizi. (1. baskı). Seçkin Publishing.
  • Bengtsson, M. (2016). How to plan and perform a qualitative study using content analysis. NursingPlus Open, 2, 8-14.
  • Birol, G. (2007). An evaluation on the identity of a city and the Kervansaray Hotel]. Journal of Arkitekt, 514 (1), 46-54.
  • Crabtree, B. F. & Miller, W. L. (1999). Doing qualitative research. Sage.
  • Çelik, C., (2012). From “The Urban of Islam” to “Urbanized Islam”: the Codes of Civilisation in the city from the point of historical experience and sociological practise, Mill ve Nihal, 9 (3), 137- 156.
  • Demir Bayraktar, H. (2017). Istanbul as a city in huzur and its urban ıdentity and Istanbulites. Journal of International Social Research, 10 (54).
  • Francis, D.,& Le Roux, A. (2011). Teaching for social justice education: the intersection between identity, critical agency, and social justice education. South African Journal of Education, 31(3), 299-311.
  • Glesne C. (2012). Nitel araştırmaya giriş (1. Baskı) [Introduction to Qualitative Research (1st Edition)], (Trans.) Ali Ersoy ve Pelin Yalçınoğlu, Anı Publishing.
  • Gökalp, Z. (1976). Türkleşmek, islamlaşmak, muasırlaşmak [Turkification, Islamization, modernization]. Ötüken Publication.
  • İlgar, E. (2008). Kent kimliği ve kentsel değişimin kent kimliği boyutu: Eskişehir örneği. [Master Thesis].Anadolu University.
  • Kafesoğlu, İ. (2005). Türk milli kültürü [Turkish national culture]. Ötüken Publication.
  • Kalın, İ. (2010). Worldview, conception of existence and the idea of order: an introduction to the concept of civilization. Dîvân: Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, (29), 1-61.
  • Karaaslan, Ç. (2010). Tarihi kentlerde kimliksizleşme sorunu ve bir çözüm yolu olarak kentsel canlandırma projeleri [Unpublished Master Thesis ]. Ankara University.
  • Kaypak, Ş. (2010). Examination of Antakya in terms of urban ıdentity. Journal of Mustafa Kemal University Institute of Social Sciences, 7 14), 373-392.
  • Kılıçkaya Boğ, E. E. (2019). City identity and font relationship. Dumlupınar University Journal of Social Sciences, (61), 109-121.
  • Kızılay, Ş. E. (2010) Ufkî Şehir [Horizon City]. Z Journal.
  • Korthagen, F. A. (2004). In search of the essence of a good teacher: Towards a more holistic approach in teacher education. Teaching and teacher education, 20(1), 77-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2003.10.002
  • Miles, M. B. and Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Sage.
  • Ökten, C. E. (2021). Medeniyetimizin Sembolü İstanbul, Şehir ve Düşünce, 17, 24-31.
  • Ökten, S. (2012). Yahya Kemal's Istanbul and its sequel. Ötüken Publication.
  • Ökten, S. (2014). Istanbul School. 1453 Istanbul Culture and Art Magazine, 20, ss.12-18.
  • Özsezer, M. S. B.,& Saban, A. İ. (2021). Towards the development of teachers for the future. South African Journal of Education, 41(2).
  • Rossi, A. (1999). The architecture of the city, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
  • Sağdıç, M. (2014). Analysis of university students' perceptions of Istanbul in terms of city image. Electronic Turkish Studies, 9 (2).
  • Sennett, R. (2002). Skin and Stone Body and City in Western Civilization. Trans. Birkan, T., Metis..
  • Starks, H. & Trinidad, S. B. (2007). Choose your method: A comparison of phenomenology, discourse analysis, and grounded theory. Qualitative Health Research, 17(10), 1372-1380.
  • Şahin, N. (2010). Examination of Urban Identity and the Process of Change in the Case of Kayseri City. Mimar Sinan Fine Arts University, Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, Unpublished Master Thesis, Istanbul.
  • Tanpınar, A. H. (1960). Five Cities. Dergâh Publications.
  • Tanpınar, A. H. (2009). Serenity. Dergâh Publications, 17th edition.
  • Tavşancıl, E. & Aslan, E. (2001). Content analysis and application examples for oral, written and other materials. Istanbul: Epsilon.
  • Topçu, K. D. (2011). A Study on Urban Identity: The Case of Konya. International Journal of Human Sciences, 8(2), 1050-1072.
  • Tuan, Y. (1976). Humanistic Geography. Annals of Association of American Geographers, 66(2), pp. 277-292.
  • Ulu, A. ve Karakoç, İ. (2004). The effect of urban change on urban identity. Journal of Planning, 3(29), 59-66.
  • Wimpenny, P.,& Gass, J. (2000). Interviewing in phenomenology and grounded theory: is there a difference?. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 31(6), 1485-1492.
  • Yıldırım, M. (2014). City Identity and Religion in the Context of Sacred Space Perception. Çukurova University Journal of Social Sciences Institute, 23 (1) 133-142.
Toplam 43 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular Eğitim Üzerine Çalışmalar
Bölüm Research Article
Yazarlar

Celile Ökten 0000-0002-5541-648X

Mehmet Önder Karacaoğlu 0000-0002-4461-6021

Neslihan Karakuş 0000-0001-7808-1099

Yayımlanma Tarihi 30 Ekim 2022
Kabul Tarihi 29 Ekim 2022
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2022 Cilt: 5 Sayı: 2

Kaynak Göster

APA Ökten, C., Karacaoğlu, M. Ö., & Karakuş, N. (2022). City, Identity and Civilization in the Eyes of Teacher Candidates. Journal of Social Sciences And Education, 5(2), 171-190. https://doi.org/10.53047/josse.1115124