BibTex RIS Cite

-

Year 2014, Volume: 11 Issue: 2, 237 - 257, 06.01.2015

Özlem Karaırmak Özge Hacıfazlıoğlu Selçuk Şirin

Abstract

This study aims to examine reliability and validity analysis of the Balanced Differentiation and Integration Scale (İmamoğlu, 1998) on an adolescence sample and test the psychometric properties of the scale. The data was obtained from 1658 high school students from 16 high schools in four provinces in Istanbul that have the highest rates of immigration (Zeytinburnu, Gaziosmanpaşa, Büyükçekmece and Esenyurt Regions). The data was divided into two sets. In the first set, Explanatory Factor Analysis was conducted, and 6 factors were found, which is similar to Imamoğlu’s study. In the second data set, Confirmatory Factor Analysis was conducted, and it was found that the model is acceptable. This study is based on the data collected as a part of TÜBİTAK 1010 Project

Keywords

Balanced integration adolescence integration and differentiation

References

  • Bowlby, J. (1988). A Secure Base: Parent-Child Attachment and Healthy Human Development. Tavistock Professional Book. London: Routledge.
  • Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2007). Sosyal Bilimler İçin Veri Analizi El Kitabı. Ankara: Pegem Yayıncılık.
  • Deci, E. L. & Ryan, R. M. (1991). A motivational approach to self: Integration in personality. In R. Dienstbier (Ed), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation: Perspectives on Motivation (ss. 237-288). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
  • Faschingbauer T., Zisook S. DeVaul R. (1987).The Texas revised inventory of grief. S Zisook (Ed.). Biopsychosocial Aspect of Bereavement. Washington: American Psychiatric Press. (pp.111-124)
  • Gezici, M. & Güvenç, G. (2003). Çalışan kadınların ve ev kadınlarının benlik algısı ve benlik kurgusu açısından karşılaştırılması. Turkish Journal of Psychology, 18, 1-17.
  • Gabriel, S. & Gardner, W. L. (1999). Are there “his” and “hers” types of interdependence? The implications of gender differences in collective versus relational interdependence for affect, behavior and cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 642-655.
  • Gilligan, C. (1982) In a Different Voice, United States of America: Harvard University Press.
  • Guisinger, S. & Blatt, S. J. (1994). Individuality and relatedness: evolution of a fundamental dialectic. American Psychologist, 49, 104-111.
  • Güler, A. (2004). Relationship between self-construals and future time orientations. Unpublished Master’s Thesis. Ankara, Türkiye: Middle East Technical University.
  • İmamoğlu, E. O. (1987). An interdependence model of human development. In Ç. Kağıtçıbaşı (Ed)., Growth and Progress in Cross Cultural Psychology (ss. 138-145). Lisse, the Netherlands: Swets and Zeitlinger.
  • İmamoğlu, E. O. (1998). Individualism and collectivism in a model and scale of balanced differentiation and integration. Journal of Psychology, 132, 95-105.
  • İmamoğlu, E. O. (1995). Değişim sürecinde aile: evlilik ilişkileri, bireysel gelişim ve demogratik değerler. 1994 Aile Kurultayı (s.33-51). Ankara, Turkey: Aile Araştırma Kurumu.
  • İmamoğlu. E. O. (2003). Individuation and relatedness: Not opposing but distinct and complementary. Genetic Social and General Psychology Monographs, 129, 367-402.
  • Imamoğlu, E. O. & Karakitapoğlu-Aygün, Z. (2004). Self-construals and values across different cultural and socioeconomic contexts. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 130, 277–306.
  • İmamoğlu. E. O. & Karakitapoğlu-Aygün. Z. (2006). Actual, ideal and expected relatedness with parents across and within cultures. European Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 721-745.
  • İmamoğlu, E. O., & Karakitapoğlu Aygün, Z. (2007). Relatedness of identities and emotional closeness with parents across and within cultures. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 10, 145-161.
  • İmamoğlu. E. O. & Güler-Edwards. A. (2007). Geleceğe ilişkin yönelimlerde benlik tipine bağlı farklılıklar (Self-related differences in future time orientations). Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 22, 115-138.
  • İmamoğlu, E. O., Günaydın, G. & Selçuk, E. (2011). Özgün benliğin yordayıcıları olarak kendileşme ve ilişkililik: Cinsiyetin ve kültürel yönelimlerin ötesinde, Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 26 (67), 27-43.
  • Kağıtçıbaşı, Ç. (1970). Social norms and authoritarianism: A Turkish- American comparison. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 16, 444-451.
  • Kağıtçıbaşı, Ç. (1986). Status of women in Turkey: Cross cultural perspectives, sex roles, value of children and fertility in Turkey. International Journal of Middle East Studies, 18, 485-499.
  • Kağıtçıbaşı, Ç. (1996). Özerk ilişkisel benlik: Yeni bir sentez. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 11, 444-451.
  • Kernis, M. H. & Goldman, B. M. (2006). A multi component conceptualization of authenticity: Theory and research. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 283-357.
  • Mertler, C. A. & Vannata, R.A. (2010). Advanced and Multivariate Statistical Methods: Practical Application and Interpretation. Los Angeles: Pyrczak Publishing.
  • Pallant, J. (2005). SPSS Survıval Manual: A Step by Step Guıde to Data Analysis Using SPSS for Wındows. Australia: Australian Copyright.
  • Phalet, K. & Claeys, W. (1993). A Comparative Dtudy of Turkish and Belgian Youth, Journal of Cross Cultural Psychology, 24, 319-343.
  • Sinha, D. & Tripathi, R. C. (1994). Individualism in a collectivist culture. A case of coexistence of opposites. In U Kim, H. C. Triandis, Ç. Kapıtçıbaşı, S. Choi, & G. Yoon (eds), Individualism and Collectivism: Theory, Method and Applications (ss. 123-136). Thousand oaks, CA: sage.
  • Suh, E. M. (2002). Culture, identity consistency, and subjective well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 1378-1391.
  • Triandis, H. C., Bontempo, R., Villareal, M. J., Asai, M. & Lucca, N. (1988). Individualism and collectivism: Cross cultural perspectives on self ingroup relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54 (2), 323-338.

Year 2014, Volume: 11 Issue: 2, 237 - 257, 06.01.2015

Özlem Karaırmak Özge Hacıfazlıoğlu Selçuk Şirin

Abstract

References

  • Bowlby, J. (1988). A Secure Base: Parent-Child Attachment and Healthy Human Development. Tavistock Professional Book. London: Routledge.
  • Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2007). Sosyal Bilimler İçin Veri Analizi El Kitabı. Ankara: Pegem Yayıncılık.
  • Deci, E. L. & Ryan, R. M. (1991). A motivational approach to self: Integration in personality. In R. Dienstbier (Ed), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation: Perspectives on Motivation (ss. 237-288). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
  • Faschingbauer T., Zisook S. DeVaul R. (1987).The Texas revised inventory of grief. S Zisook (Ed.). Biopsychosocial Aspect of Bereavement. Washington: American Psychiatric Press. (pp.111-124)
  • Gezici, M. & Güvenç, G. (2003). Çalışan kadınların ve ev kadınlarının benlik algısı ve benlik kurgusu açısından karşılaştırılması. Turkish Journal of Psychology, 18, 1-17.
  • Gabriel, S. & Gardner, W. L. (1999). Are there “his” and “hers” types of interdependence? The implications of gender differences in collective versus relational interdependence for affect, behavior and cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 642-655.
  • Gilligan, C. (1982) In a Different Voice, United States of America: Harvard University Press.
  • Guisinger, S. & Blatt, S. J. (1994). Individuality and relatedness: evolution of a fundamental dialectic. American Psychologist, 49, 104-111.
  • Güler, A. (2004). Relationship between self-construals and future time orientations. Unpublished Master’s Thesis. Ankara, Türkiye: Middle East Technical University.
  • İmamoğlu, E. O. (1987). An interdependence model of human development. In Ç. Kağıtçıbaşı (Ed)., Growth and Progress in Cross Cultural Psychology (ss. 138-145). Lisse, the Netherlands: Swets and Zeitlinger.
  • İmamoğlu, E. O. (1998). Individualism and collectivism in a model and scale of balanced differentiation and integration. Journal of Psychology, 132, 95-105.
  • İmamoğlu, E. O. (1995). Değişim sürecinde aile: evlilik ilişkileri, bireysel gelişim ve demogratik değerler. 1994 Aile Kurultayı (s.33-51). Ankara, Turkey: Aile Araştırma Kurumu.
  • İmamoğlu. E. O. (2003). Individuation and relatedness: Not opposing but distinct and complementary. Genetic Social and General Psychology Monographs, 129, 367-402.
  • Imamoğlu, E. O. & Karakitapoğlu-Aygün, Z. (2004). Self-construals and values across different cultural and socioeconomic contexts. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 130, 277–306.
  • İmamoğlu. E. O. & Karakitapoğlu-Aygün. Z. (2006). Actual, ideal and expected relatedness with parents across and within cultures. European Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 721-745.
  • İmamoğlu, E. O., & Karakitapoğlu Aygün, Z. (2007). Relatedness of identities and emotional closeness with parents across and within cultures. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 10, 145-161.
  • İmamoğlu. E. O. & Güler-Edwards. A. (2007). Geleceğe ilişkin yönelimlerde benlik tipine bağlı farklılıklar (Self-related differences in future time orientations). Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 22, 115-138.
  • İmamoğlu, E. O., Günaydın, G. & Selçuk, E. (2011). Özgün benliğin yordayıcıları olarak kendileşme ve ilişkililik: Cinsiyetin ve kültürel yönelimlerin ötesinde, Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 26 (67), 27-43.
  • Kağıtçıbaşı, Ç. (1970). Social norms and authoritarianism: A Turkish- American comparison. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 16, 444-451.
  • Kağıtçıbaşı, Ç. (1986). Status of women in Turkey: Cross cultural perspectives, sex roles, value of children and fertility in Turkey. International Journal of Middle East Studies, 18, 485-499.
  • Kağıtçıbaşı, Ç. (1996). Özerk ilişkisel benlik: Yeni bir sentez. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 11, 444-451.
  • Kernis, M. H. & Goldman, B. M. (2006). A multi component conceptualization of authenticity: Theory and research. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 283-357.
  • Mertler, C. A. & Vannata, R.A. (2010). Advanced and Multivariate Statistical Methods: Practical Application and Interpretation. Los Angeles: Pyrczak Publishing.
  • Pallant, J. (2005). SPSS Survıval Manual: A Step by Step Guıde to Data Analysis Using SPSS for Wındows. Australia: Australian Copyright.
  • Phalet, K. & Claeys, W. (1993). A Comparative Dtudy of Turkish and Belgian Youth, Journal of Cross Cultural Psychology, 24, 319-343.
  • Sinha, D. & Tripathi, R. C. (1994). Individualism in a collectivist culture. A case of coexistence of opposites. In U Kim, H. C. Triandis, Ç. Kapıtçıbaşı, S. Choi, & G. Yoon (eds), Individualism and Collectivism: Theory, Method and Applications (ss. 123-136). Thousand oaks, CA: sage.
  • Suh, E. M. (2002). Culture, identity consistency, and subjective well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 1378-1391.
  • Triandis, H. C., Bontempo, R., Villareal, M. J., Asai, M. & Lucca, N. (1988). Individualism and collectivism: Cross cultural perspectives on self ingroup relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54 (2), 323-338.

DENGELİ BÜTÜNLEŞME VE AYRIŞMA ÖLÇEĞİNİN PSİKOMETRİK ÖZELLİKLERİ: ERGENLERDE GEÇERLİLİK VE GÜVENİRLİK ÇALIŞMASI

Year 2014, Volume: 11 Issue: 2, 237 - 257, 06.01.2015

Özlem Karaırmak Özge Hacıfazlıoğlu Selçuk Şirin

Abstract

Bu çalışmada, benlik tiplerini belirlemede oldukça güçlü bir ölçme aracı olan Dengeli Bütünleşme –Ayrışma Ölçeği’nin (İmamoğlu, 1998) en önemli gelişimsel krizi kimlik arayışı olan ergen grupta daha çok kullanılabilirliğini sağlamak ve ölçeğin psikometrik özelliklerini yeniden gözden geçirmek amaçlanmıştır. Araştırma kapsamında, İstanbul’un en yoğun göç alan bölgeleri olan Büyükçekmece, Esenyurt, Gaziosmanpaşa ve Zeytinburnu ilçelerindeki 16 lisede öğrenim gören 1658 ergenden veri toplanmıştır. Veriler iki sete ayrılmıştır. Birinci veri setine dayalı yapılan Açımlayıcı Faktör Analizi sonuçlarına göre İmamoğlu tarafından belirlenmiş olan alt boyutlarla paralel 6 alt boyut ortaya çıkmıştır. İkinci veri seti kullanılarak yapılan Doğrulayıcı Faktör Analizinde, modelin uyumunun iyi olduğunu göstermektedir. Bu araştırma, TÜBİTAK 1010 projesi kapsamında yürütülmüş olan proje verilerine dayalı olarak geliştirilmiştir.

Keywords

Dengeli bütünleşme Ergenler Bütünleşme ve Ayrışma

References

  • Bowlby, J. (1988). A Secure Base: Parent-Child Attachment and Healthy Human Development. Tavistock Professional Book. London: Routledge.
  • Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2007). Sosyal Bilimler İçin Veri Analizi El Kitabı. Ankara: Pegem Yayıncılık.
  • Deci, E. L. & Ryan, R. M. (1991). A motivational approach to self: Integration in personality. In R. Dienstbier (Ed), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation: Perspectives on Motivation (ss. 237-288). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
  • Faschingbauer T., Zisook S. DeVaul R. (1987).The Texas revised inventory of grief. S Zisook (Ed.). Biopsychosocial Aspect of Bereavement. Washington: American Psychiatric Press. (pp.111-124)
  • Gezici, M. & Güvenç, G. (2003). Çalışan kadınların ve ev kadınlarının benlik algısı ve benlik kurgusu açısından karşılaştırılması. Turkish Journal of Psychology, 18, 1-17.
  • Gabriel, S. & Gardner, W. L. (1999). Are there “his” and “hers” types of interdependence? The implications of gender differences in collective versus relational interdependence for affect, behavior and cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 642-655.
  • Gilligan, C. (1982) In a Different Voice, United States of America: Harvard University Press.
  • Guisinger, S. & Blatt, S. J. (1994). Individuality and relatedness: evolution of a fundamental dialectic. American Psychologist, 49, 104-111.
  • Güler, A. (2004). Relationship between self-construals and future time orientations. Unpublished Master’s Thesis. Ankara, Türkiye: Middle East Technical University.
  • İmamoğlu, E. O. (1987). An interdependence model of human development. In Ç. Kağıtçıbaşı (Ed)., Growth and Progress in Cross Cultural Psychology (ss. 138-145). Lisse, the Netherlands: Swets and Zeitlinger.
  • İmamoğlu, E. O. (1998). Individualism and collectivism in a model and scale of balanced differentiation and integration. Journal of Psychology, 132, 95-105.
  • İmamoğlu, E. O. (1995). Değişim sürecinde aile: evlilik ilişkileri, bireysel gelişim ve demogratik değerler. 1994 Aile Kurultayı (s.33-51). Ankara, Turkey: Aile Araştırma Kurumu.
  • İmamoğlu. E. O. (2003). Individuation and relatedness: Not opposing but distinct and complementary. Genetic Social and General Psychology Monographs, 129, 367-402.
  • Imamoğlu, E. O. & Karakitapoğlu-Aygün, Z. (2004). Self-construals and values across different cultural and socioeconomic contexts. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 130, 277–306.
  • İmamoğlu. E. O. & Karakitapoğlu-Aygün. Z. (2006). Actual, ideal and expected relatedness with parents across and within cultures. European Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 721-745.
  • İmamoğlu, E. O., & Karakitapoğlu Aygün, Z. (2007). Relatedness of identities and emotional closeness with parents across and within cultures. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 10, 145-161.
  • İmamoğlu. E. O. & Güler-Edwards. A. (2007). Geleceğe ilişkin yönelimlerde benlik tipine bağlı farklılıklar (Self-related differences in future time orientations). Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 22, 115-138.
  • İmamoğlu, E. O., Günaydın, G. & Selçuk, E. (2011). Özgün benliğin yordayıcıları olarak kendileşme ve ilişkililik: Cinsiyetin ve kültürel yönelimlerin ötesinde, Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 26 (67), 27-43.
  • Kağıtçıbaşı, Ç. (1970). Social norms and authoritarianism: A Turkish- American comparison. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 16, 444-451.
  • Kağıtçıbaşı, Ç. (1986). Status of women in Turkey: Cross cultural perspectives, sex roles, value of children and fertility in Turkey. International Journal of Middle East Studies, 18, 485-499.
  • Kağıtçıbaşı, Ç. (1996). Özerk ilişkisel benlik: Yeni bir sentez. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 11, 444-451.
  • Kernis, M. H. & Goldman, B. M. (2006). A multi component conceptualization of authenticity: Theory and research. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 283-357.
  • Mertler, C. A. & Vannata, R.A. (2010). Advanced and Multivariate Statistical Methods: Practical Application and Interpretation. Los Angeles: Pyrczak Publishing.
  • Pallant, J. (2005). SPSS Survıval Manual: A Step by Step Guıde to Data Analysis Using SPSS for Wındows. Australia: Australian Copyright.
  • Phalet, K. & Claeys, W. (1993). A Comparative Dtudy of Turkish and Belgian Youth, Journal of Cross Cultural Psychology, 24, 319-343.
  • Sinha, D. & Tripathi, R. C. (1994). Individualism in a collectivist culture. A case of coexistence of opposites. In U Kim, H. C. Triandis, Ç. Kapıtçıbaşı, S. Choi, & G. Yoon (eds), Individualism and Collectivism: Theory, Method and Applications (ss. 123-136). Thousand oaks, CA: sage.
  • Suh, E. M. (2002). Culture, identity consistency, and subjective well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 1378-1391.
  • Triandis, H. C., Bontempo, R., Villareal, M. J., Asai, M. & Lucca, N. (1988). Individualism and collectivism: Cross cultural perspectives on self ingroup relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54 (2), 323-338.
There are 28 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Özlem Karaırmak

Özge Hacıfazlıoğlu

Selçuk Şirin This is me

Publication Date January 6, 2015
Published in Issue Year 2014 Volume: 11 Issue: 2

Cite

APA Karaırmak, Ö., Hacıfazlıoğlu, Ö., & Şirin, S. (2015). DENGELİ BÜTÜNLEŞME VE AYRIŞMA ÖLÇEĞİNİN PSİKOMETRİK ÖZELLİKLERİ: ERGENLERDE GEÇERLİLİK VE GÜVENİRLİK ÇALIŞMASI. HAYEF Journal of Education, 11(2), 237-257.
AMA Karaırmak Ö, Hacıfazlıoğlu Ö, Şirin S. DENGELİ BÜTÜNLEŞME VE AYRIŞMA ÖLÇEĞİNİN PSİKOMETRİK ÖZELLİKLERİ: ERGENLERDE GEÇERLİLİK VE GÜVENİRLİK ÇALIŞMASI. HAYEF Journal of Education. January 2015;11(2):237-257.
Chicago Karaırmak, Özlem, Özge Hacıfazlıoğlu, and Selçuk Şirin. “DENGELİ BÜTÜNLEŞME VE AYRIŞMA ÖLÇEĞİNİN PSİKOMETRİK ÖZELLİKLERİ: ERGENLERDE GEÇERLİLİK VE GÜVENİRLİK ÇALIŞMASI”. HAYEF Journal of Education 11, no. 2 (January 2015): 237-57.
EndNote Karaırmak Ö, Hacıfazlıoğlu Ö, Şirin S (January 1, 2015) DENGELİ BÜTÜNLEŞME VE AYRIŞMA ÖLÇEĞİNİN PSİKOMETRİK ÖZELLİKLERİ: ERGENLERDE GEÇERLİLİK VE GÜVENİRLİK ÇALIŞMASI. HAYEF Journal of Education 11 2 237–257.
IEEE Ö. Karaırmak, Ö. Hacıfazlıoğlu, and S. Şirin, “DENGELİ BÜTÜNLEŞME VE AYRIŞMA ÖLÇEĞİNİN PSİKOMETRİK ÖZELLİKLERİ: ERGENLERDE GEÇERLİLİK VE GÜVENİRLİK ÇALIŞMASI”, HAYEF Journal of Education, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 237–257, 2015.
ISNAD Karaırmak, Özlem et al. “DENGELİ BÜTÜNLEŞME VE AYRIŞMA ÖLÇEĞİNİN PSİKOMETRİK ÖZELLİKLERİ: ERGENLERDE GEÇERLİLİK VE GÜVENİRLİK ÇALIŞMASI”. HAYEF Journal of Education 11/2 (January 2015), 237-257.
JAMA Karaırmak Ö, Hacıfazlıoğlu Ö, Şirin S. DENGELİ BÜTÜNLEŞME VE AYRIŞMA ÖLÇEĞİNİN PSİKOMETRİK ÖZELLİKLERİ: ERGENLERDE GEÇERLİLİK VE GÜVENİRLİK ÇALIŞMASI. HAYEF Journal of Education. 2015;11:237–257.
MLA Karaırmak, Özlem et al. “DENGELİ BÜTÜNLEŞME VE AYRIŞMA ÖLÇEĞİNİN PSİKOMETRİK ÖZELLİKLERİ: ERGENLERDE GEÇERLİLİK VE GÜVENİRLİK ÇALIŞMASI”. HAYEF Journal of Education, vol. 11, no. 2, 2015, pp. 237-5.
Vancouver Karaırmak Ö, Hacıfazlıoğlu Ö, Şirin S. DENGELİ BÜTÜNLEŞME VE AYRIŞMA ÖLÇEĞİNİN PSİKOMETRİK ÖZELLİKLERİ: ERGENLERDE GEÇERLİLİK VE GÜVENİRLİK ÇALIŞMASI. HAYEF Journal of Education. 2015;11(2):237-5.
 Download Cover Image