BibTex RIS Cite
Year 2016, Volume: 15 Issue: 4, 0 - 0, 01.10.2016
https://doi.org/10.17051/io.2016.12031

Abstract

References

  • Anderson, O.R., Randle, D. & Covotsos, T. (2001). The role of ideational networks in laboratory
  • inquiry learning and knowledge of evolution among seventh grade students. Science Education, 85(4), 410-425.
  • Atabek-Yigit, E. (2015). Exploring the relationship between cognitive structure outcomes and test
  • achievements of pre-service science teachers on chemical bonding via flow mapping. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 14(4), 524-534.
  • Atkins, P. & Jones, L. (1997). Chemistry: Molecules, Matter, and Change (3rd Ed.). vol.1.,
  • Newyork: W.H.Freeman and Company.
  • Aydın, F. & Taşar, M.F. (2010). An investigation of pre-service science teachers’ cognitive
  • structures and ideas about the nature of technology. Ahi Evran Unv. Kirsehir Edu.Fac.Journal, 11(4), 209-221.
  • Bahar, M. & Hansell, M.H. (2000). The relationship between some psychological factors and
  • their effect on the performance of grid questions and word association tests. Educational Psychology, 20(3), 346-364.
  • Bahar, M., Johnstone, A.H. & Sutcliffe, R.G. (1999). Investigation of students’ cognitive
  • structure in elementary genetics through word association tests. Journal of Biological
  • Education, 33(3), 134-141.
  • Bahar, M. ve Özatlı, N.S. (2003). Kelime İletişim Test Yöntemi ile Lise 1.Sinif Öğrencilerinin
  • Canlıların Temel Bileşenleri Konusundaki Bilişsel Yapılarının Araştırılması. BAU Fen
  • Bil Ens Dergisi, 5 (2), 75-85.
  • Bishop, B.A. & Anderson, C.W. (1990). Students’ conceptions of natural selection and its role in
  • evolution. J.Res Sci Teaching, 27(5), 415-427.
  • Brown, T.L., LeMay, H.E. & Bursten, B.E. (1991). Chemistry The Central Science (5th Ed.).
  • NewJersey: Prentice Hall.
  • Dhindsa, H.S., Kasim, M. & Anderson, O.R. (2011). Constructivist-visual mind map teaching
  • approach and the quality of students’ cognitive structures. J Sci Edu Technol, 20, 186-200.
  • Ercan, F., Taşdere, A. ve Ercan, N. (2010). Kelime İlişkilendirme Testi Aracılığıyla Bilişsel
  • Yapının ve Kavramsal Değişimin Gözlenmesi. Türk Fen Eğt. Dergisi, 7 (2), 136-154.
  • Gabel, D. (1999). Improving teaching and learning through chemistry education research: a look
  • to the future. J Chem Edu, 76(4), 548-554.
  • Hill, J.W. & Petrucci, R.H. (1999). General Chemistry An Integrated Approach (2nd d.). USA:
  • Prentice Hall.
  • Hovardas, T. & Korfiatis, K.J. (2006). Word associations as a tool for assessing conceptual
  • change in science education. Leraning and Instruction, 16, 416-432.
  • Işıklı, M., Taşdere, A. ve Göz, N.L. (2011). Kelime İlişkilendirme Testi Aracılığıyla Öğretmen
  • Adaylarının Atatürk İlkelerine Yönelik Bilişsel Yapılarının İncelenmesi. Uşak Unv.
  • Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 4 (1), 50-72.,
  • Kostova, Z. & Radoynovska, B. (2008). Word association test for studying conceptual structures
  • of teachers and students. Bulgarian Journal of Science and Education Policy, 2(2), 209-231.
  • Kurt, H. ve Ekici, G. (2013). Biyoloji Öğretmen Adaylarının Bağımsız Kelime İlişkilendirme
  • Testi ve Çizme-Yazma Tekniğiyle “Ozmoz” Kavramı Konusundaki Bilişsel Yapılarının
  • Belirlenmesi. Turkish Studies, 8 (12), 809-829.
  • Miles, M.B., Huberman, A.M. & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods
  • Sourcebook. (3rd Ed.). USA: Sage Publications.
  • Nakiboğlu, C. (2008). Using word associations for assessing non major science students’
  • knowledge structure before and after general chemistry instruction: in the case of atomic structure, Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 9, 309-322.
  • Naylor, S. & Keogh, B. (1999). Constructivism in classroom: Theory into practice. J Sci Teacher
  • Edu, 10(2), 93-106.
  • Özata-Yücel, E. & Özkan, M. (2015). Determination of secondary school students’ cognitive
  • structure and misconception in ecological concepts through word association test, Educational Research and Reviews, 10(5), 660-674.
  • Özatlı, N.S. ve Bahar, M. (2010). Öğrencilerin Boşaltım Sistemi Konusundaki Bilişsel
  • Yapılarının Yeni Teknikler ile Ortaya Konması, Abant İzzet Baysal Unv. Dergisi, 10 (2),
  • -26.
  • Taber, K.S. (2001). Building the structural concepts of chemistry: some considerations from
  • educational research, Chemistry Education: Research and Practice in Europe, 2(2), 123-
  • Tsai, C.C. (2001). Probing students’ cognitive structures in science: the use of a flow map method
  • coupled with a meta-listening technique. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 27, 257-168.
  • Tsai, C.C. & Huang, C.M. (2002). Exploring students’ cognitive structures in learning science: a
  • review of relevant methods, Journal of Biological Education, 36(4), 163-169.
  • Wu, Y.T. & Tsai, C.C. (2011). High school students’ informal reasoning regarding a socio-
  • scientific issue, with relation to scientific epistemological beliefs and cognitive structures.
  • International Journal of Science Education, 33(3), 371-400.

Investigating Cognitive Structures in Some Basic Chemistry Concepts via Word Association Test

Year 2016, Volume: 15 Issue: 4, 0 - 0, 01.10.2016
https://doi.org/10.17051/io.2016.12031

Abstract

Bu çalışmada kelime ilişkilendirme testi kullanılarak fen bilgisi öğretmen adaylarının bazı temel kimya kavramları hakkındaki bilişsel yapılarının ortaya çıkarılması amaçlanmıştır. Veriler testteki her bir anahtar kelimeye verilen cevap kelime sayısına göre değerlendirilmiş ve hem frekans hem de ilişkililik katsayısına bağlı olarak çizilen kavram haritalarına göre analiz edilmiştir. Çalışmanın sonuçlarına göre katılımcıların verilen temel kavramlar ile ilgili bilişsel yapılarının en güçlü kısmının “bileşik-molekül” ilişkisi olduğu, en fazla ise “iyon” kavramı ile ilgili zayıflıklarının/eksikliklerinin bulunduğu belirlenmiştir. Bu sonuçlarda kavramların soyut oluşu ve öğrencilerin makro ve mikro ilişkileri iyi özümseyememelerinin etkili olduğu düşünülmektedir. Ayrıca katılımcıların yazdığı cümlelerin analizine göre katılımcılar bilgiyi en çok “tanımlayabilmekte” ve “betimleyebilmekte” iken, bilgiyi “kıyaslama” ve “yorumlama“da eksiklikleri vardır.  Çalışma konunun başlangıcında uygulanmış ve kelime ilişkilendirme testi ile katılımcıların bilişsel yapıları ortaya konmuştur. Elde edilen verilere göre dersin tasarlanabileceği belirtilmiştir. 

References

  • Anderson, O.R., Randle, D. & Covotsos, T. (2001). The role of ideational networks in laboratory
  • inquiry learning and knowledge of evolution among seventh grade students. Science Education, 85(4), 410-425.
  • Atabek-Yigit, E. (2015). Exploring the relationship between cognitive structure outcomes and test
  • achievements of pre-service science teachers on chemical bonding via flow mapping. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 14(4), 524-534.
  • Atkins, P. & Jones, L. (1997). Chemistry: Molecules, Matter, and Change (3rd Ed.). vol.1.,
  • Newyork: W.H.Freeman and Company.
  • Aydın, F. & Taşar, M.F. (2010). An investigation of pre-service science teachers’ cognitive
  • structures and ideas about the nature of technology. Ahi Evran Unv. Kirsehir Edu.Fac.Journal, 11(4), 209-221.
  • Bahar, M. & Hansell, M.H. (2000). The relationship between some psychological factors and
  • their effect on the performance of grid questions and word association tests. Educational Psychology, 20(3), 346-364.
  • Bahar, M., Johnstone, A.H. & Sutcliffe, R.G. (1999). Investigation of students’ cognitive
  • structure in elementary genetics through word association tests. Journal of Biological
  • Education, 33(3), 134-141.
  • Bahar, M. ve Özatlı, N.S. (2003). Kelime İletişim Test Yöntemi ile Lise 1.Sinif Öğrencilerinin
  • Canlıların Temel Bileşenleri Konusundaki Bilişsel Yapılarının Araştırılması. BAU Fen
  • Bil Ens Dergisi, 5 (2), 75-85.
  • Bishop, B.A. & Anderson, C.W. (1990). Students’ conceptions of natural selection and its role in
  • evolution. J.Res Sci Teaching, 27(5), 415-427.
  • Brown, T.L., LeMay, H.E. & Bursten, B.E. (1991). Chemistry The Central Science (5th Ed.).
  • NewJersey: Prentice Hall.
  • Dhindsa, H.S., Kasim, M. & Anderson, O.R. (2011). Constructivist-visual mind map teaching
  • approach and the quality of students’ cognitive structures. J Sci Edu Technol, 20, 186-200.
  • Ercan, F., Taşdere, A. ve Ercan, N. (2010). Kelime İlişkilendirme Testi Aracılığıyla Bilişsel
  • Yapının ve Kavramsal Değişimin Gözlenmesi. Türk Fen Eğt. Dergisi, 7 (2), 136-154.
  • Gabel, D. (1999). Improving teaching and learning through chemistry education research: a look
  • to the future. J Chem Edu, 76(4), 548-554.
  • Hill, J.W. & Petrucci, R.H. (1999). General Chemistry An Integrated Approach (2nd d.). USA:
  • Prentice Hall.
  • Hovardas, T. & Korfiatis, K.J. (2006). Word associations as a tool for assessing conceptual
  • change in science education. Leraning and Instruction, 16, 416-432.
  • Işıklı, M., Taşdere, A. ve Göz, N.L. (2011). Kelime İlişkilendirme Testi Aracılığıyla Öğretmen
  • Adaylarının Atatürk İlkelerine Yönelik Bilişsel Yapılarının İncelenmesi. Uşak Unv.
  • Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 4 (1), 50-72.,
  • Kostova, Z. & Radoynovska, B. (2008). Word association test for studying conceptual structures
  • of teachers and students. Bulgarian Journal of Science and Education Policy, 2(2), 209-231.
  • Kurt, H. ve Ekici, G. (2013). Biyoloji Öğretmen Adaylarının Bağımsız Kelime İlişkilendirme
  • Testi ve Çizme-Yazma Tekniğiyle “Ozmoz” Kavramı Konusundaki Bilişsel Yapılarının
  • Belirlenmesi. Turkish Studies, 8 (12), 809-829.
  • Miles, M.B., Huberman, A.M. & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods
  • Sourcebook. (3rd Ed.). USA: Sage Publications.
  • Nakiboğlu, C. (2008). Using word associations for assessing non major science students’
  • knowledge structure before and after general chemistry instruction: in the case of atomic structure, Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 9, 309-322.
  • Naylor, S. & Keogh, B. (1999). Constructivism in classroom: Theory into practice. J Sci Teacher
  • Edu, 10(2), 93-106.
  • Özata-Yücel, E. & Özkan, M. (2015). Determination of secondary school students’ cognitive
  • structure and misconception in ecological concepts through word association test, Educational Research and Reviews, 10(5), 660-674.
  • Özatlı, N.S. ve Bahar, M. (2010). Öğrencilerin Boşaltım Sistemi Konusundaki Bilişsel
  • Yapılarının Yeni Teknikler ile Ortaya Konması, Abant İzzet Baysal Unv. Dergisi, 10 (2),
  • -26.
  • Taber, K.S. (2001). Building the structural concepts of chemistry: some considerations from
  • educational research, Chemistry Education: Research and Practice in Europe, 2(2), 123-
  • Tsai, C.C. (2001). Probing students’ cognitive structures in science: the use of a flow map method
  • coupled with a meta-listening technique. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 27, 257-168.
  • Tsai, C.C. & Huang, C.M. (2002). Exploring students’ cognitive structures in learning science: a
  • review of relevant methods, Journal of Biological Education, 36(4), 163-169.
  • Wu, Y.T. & Tsai, C.C. (2011). High school students’ informal reasoning regarding a socio-
  • scientific issue, with relation to scientific epistemological beliefs and cognitive structures.
  • International Journal of Science Education, 33(3), 371-400.
There are 58 citations in total.

Details

Journal Section Articles
Authors

Elif Atabek Yiğit

Publication Date October 1, 2016
Published in Issue Year 2016 Volume: 15 Issue: 4

Cite

APA Yiğit, E. A. (2016). Investigating Cognitive Structures in Some Basic Chemistry Concepts via Word Association Test. İlköğretim Online, 15(4). https://doi.org/10.17051/io.2016.12031
AMA Yiğit EA. Investigating Cognitive Structures in Some Basic Chemistry Concepts via Word Association Test. EEO. September 2016;15(4). doi:10.17051/io.2016.12031
Chicago Yiğit, Elif Atabek. “Investigating Cognitive Structures in Some Basic Chemistry Concepts via Word Association Test”. İlköğretim Online 15, no. 4 (September 2016). https://doi.org/10.17051/io.2016.12031.
EndNote Yiğit EA (September 1, 2016) Investigating Cognitive Structures in Some Basic Chemistry Concepts via Word Association Test. İlköğretim Online 15 4
IEEE E. A. Yiğit, “Investigating Cognitive Structures in Some Basic Chemistry Concepts via Word Association Test”, EEO, vol. 15, no. 4, 2016, doi: 10.17051/io.2016.12031.
ISNAD Yiğit, Elif Atabek. “Investigating Cognitive Structures in Some Basic Chemistry Concepts via Word Association Test”. İlköğretim Online 15/4 (September 2016). https://doi.org/10.17051/io.2016.12031.
JAMA Yiğit EA. Investigating Cognitive Structures in Some Basic Chemistry Concepts via Word Association Test. EEO. 2016;15. doi:10.17051/io.2016.12031.
MLA Yiğit, Elif Atabek. “Investigating Cognitive Structures in Some Basic Chemistry Concepts via Word Association Test”. İlköğretim Online, vol. 15, no. 4, 2016, doi:10.17051/io.2016.12031.
Vancouver Yiğit EA. Investigating Cognitive Structures in Some Basic Chemistry Concepts via Word Association Test. EEO. 2016;15(4).