Missing data is a common problem in datasets that are obtained by administration of educational and psychological tests. It is widely known that existence of missing observations in data can lead to serious problems such as biased parameter estimates and inflation of standard errors. Most of the missing data imputation methods are focused on datasets containing continuous variables. However, it is very common to work with datasets that are made of dichotomous responses of individuals to a set of test items to which IRT models are fitted. This study compared the performances of missing data imputation methods that are IRT model-based imputation (MBI), Expectation-Maximization (EM), Multiple Imputation (MI), and Regression Imputation (RI). Parameter recoveries were evaluated by repetitive analyses that were conducted on samples that were drawn from an empirical large-scale dataset. Results showed that MBI outperformed other imputation methods in recovering item difficulty and mean of the ability parameters, especially with higher sample sizes. However, MI produced the best results in recovery of item discrimination parameters.
Missing Data IRT Model-Based Imputation Multiple Imputation Expectation-Maximization Regression Imputation
Missing data is a common problem in datasets that
are obtained by administration of educational and psychological tests. It is widely
known that existence of missing observations in data can lead to serious problems
such as biased parameter estimates and inflation of standard errors. Most of the
missing data imputation methods are focused on datasets containing continuous variables.
However, it is very common to work with datasets that are made of dichotomous responses
of individuals to a set of test items to which IRT models are fitted. This study
compared the performances of missing data imputation methods that are IRT model-based
imputation (MBI), Expectation-Maximization (EM), Multiple Imputation (MI), and Regression
Imputation (RI). Parameter recoveries were evaluated by repetitive analyses that
were conducted on samples that were drawn from an empirical large-scale dataset.
Results showed that MBI outperformed other imputation methods in recovering item
difficulty and mean of the ability parameters, especially with higher sample sizes.
However, MI produced the best results in recovery of item discrimination parameters.
Missing Data IRT Model-Based Imputation Multiple Imputation Expectation-Maximization Regression Imputation
Primary Language | English |
---|---|
Subjects | Studies on Education |
Journal Section | Articles |
Authors | |
Publication Date | September 19, 2018 |
Submission Date | May 10, 2018 |
Published in Issue | Year 2018 Volume: 5 Issue: 3 |