BibTex RIS Cite

-

Year 2014, Volume: 15 Issue: 1, 80 - 95, 10.07.2014
https://doi.org/10.12984/eed.63750

Abstract

The aim of this study is to adapt the Leisure Boredom Scale(LBS), that was developed by Iso-Ahola ve Weissinger (1990), into Turkish language and to assess the reliability and validity among high school students. The participants consisted of 469 students from 9th to 12th grades of high schools in İzmir city center. Structure of the LBS was examined employing a confirmatory factor analysis and exploratory factor analysis. EFA results showed that a constract with 12 items and two factors, namely “Competence” and “Motivation” was achieved. Also CFA results supported this structure. As a part of discriminant validity study, between the two subdimensions of Leisure Boredom Scale and the six subdimensions of Leisure Satisfaction Scale were found significantly negative correlations. Moreover, Cronbach alpha correlations of scale and subscales proved that the LBS is a reliable instrument

References

  • Agnew, R. ve Petersen, D. M. (1989). Leisure and delinquency. Social Problems, 36, 332-350.
  • Akbulut, Y. (2010). Sosyal bilimlerde SPSS uygulamaları. İstanbul: İdeal Kültür & Yayıncılık.
  • Arslan, F., Ünal, A. S., Güler, H. ve Kardaş, K. (2006). Okul çağı çocuklarının televizyon izleme alışkanlıklarının incelenmesi. TSK Koruyucu Hekimlik Bülteni, 5(6), 391-401.
  • Beard ve Ragheb (1980). Measuring leisure satisfaction. Journal of Leisure Research, 12(1), 20-33.
  • Bjarnadottir, R. (2004). Modern adolescents’ leisure activities: A new field for education?. Young, 12(4), 299-315.
  • Bradley, G. L. (2010). Skate parks as a context for adolescent development. Journal of Adolescent Research, 25(2), 288-323.
  • Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2012). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı. 17. Baskı. Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
  • Caldwell, L. L. ve Smith, E. (2006). Leisure as a context for youth development and delinquency prevention. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 39(3), 398-418.
  • Coatsworth, J. D., Hiley Sharp, E., Palen, L. A., Darling, N., Cumsille, P. ve Marta, E. (2005). Exploring adolescent self-defining leisure activities and identity experiences across three countries. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 29, 361-370.
  • Fahlman, S. A., Mercer-Lynn, K. B., Flora, D. B. ve Eastwood, J. D. (2013). Development and validation of the multidimensional state boredom scale. Assessment, 20(1), 68-85.
  • Fisher, C. D. (1993). Boredom at work: A neglected concept. Human Relations, 46, 395-417.
  • Gökçe, H. ve Orhan, K. (2011). Serbest zaman doyum ölçeğinin Türkçe geçerlilik güvenirlik çalışması. Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, 22(4), 139-145.
  • Hamilton, J. (1981). Attention, personality, and self-regulation of mood: Absorbing attention and boredom. Progress in Experimental Personality Research, 10, 281-315.
  • Harris, M. B. (2000). Correlates and characteristics of boredom and boredom proneness. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 30, 47-77.
  • Heppner, P. P., Wampold, B. E. ve Kivlinghan, D. M. (2013). Psikolojik danışmada araştırma yöntemleri. (Çev: Siyez, D. M.). Ankara: Mentis Yayıncılık.
  • Hiley Sharp, E., Coffman, D. L., Caldwel, L. L., Smith, E. A., Wegner, L., Vergnagi, L. ve Mathews, C. (2011). Predicting substance use behavior among South African adolescents: The role of leisure experiences across time. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 35, 343.
  • Hu, L. T. ve Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1-55.
  • Iso-Ahola, S. E. ve Weissinger, E. (1987). Leisure and boredom. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 5, 356-364.
  • Iso-Ahola, S. E. ve Weissinger, E. (1990). Perceptions of boredom in leisure: Conceptualization, reliability and validity of the leisure boredom scale. Journal of Leisure Research, 22(1), 1-17.
  • Iso-Ahola, S. E. ve Crowley, E. D. (1991). Adolescent substance abuse and leisure time boredom. Journal of Leisure Research, 23, 260-271.
  • Jennen, C. ve Uhlebuck, G. (2004). Exercise and life satisfaction: Fitness complimentary strategies in the prevention and rehabilitation of ilness. Evidence-based Complimentary and Alternative Medicine, 1(2), 147-165.
  • Jöreskog, K. ve Sörbom, D. (1999). Lisrel 8: Structural Equation Modeling With The SIMPLIS Command Language. Lincolnwood: Scientific Software International.
  • Kim, B. B. (2008). Research update: Perceiving leisure. Parks & Recreation, 43(5), 24-27.
  • Mallinckrodt, B., & Wang. C. C. (2004). Quantitative methods for verifying semantic equivalence of translated research instruments: A Chinese version of the experiences in close relationships. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 51, 368-379.
  • McGee, R., Williams, S., Howden-Chapman, P., Martin, J. ve Kawachi, I. (2006). Participation in clubs and groups from childhood to adolescence and its effect on attachment and self-esteem. Journal of Adolescence, 29, 1-17.
  • Orcutt, J. D. (1984). Contrasting effects of two kinds of boredom on alcohol use. Journal of Drug Issues, 14, 161-173.
  • Palen, L. A. ve Coatsworth, J. D. (2007). Activity-based identity experiences and their relations to problem behavior and psychological wel-being in adolescence. Journal of Adolescence, 30, 721-737.
  • Shaw, S. M., Kleiber, D. A. ve Caldwell, L. L. (1995). Leisure and identity formation in male and female adolescents: A preliminary examination. Journal of Leisure Research, 27, 245-263.
  • Tabachnick, B. G. ve Fidell, L. S. (2001). Using Multivariate Statistics (4th Ed). Needham Heights: Allyn & Bacon.
  • Trottier, A. N., Brown, G. T., Hobson, S. J. G. ve Miller, W. (2002). Reliability and validity of the Leisure Satisfaction Scale (LSS-short form) and adolescent leisure interest profile (ALIP). Occupational Therapy International, 9(2), 131-144.
  • Tze, V.M.C., Klassen, R.M., Daniels, L.M., Li. J.C.H. ve Zhang, X (2013). A cross-cultural validation of the learning-related boredom scale (lrbs) with canadian and chinese college students. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 31(1) 29–40.
  • Uluslararası Test Komisyonu (International Test Commission) (2010). International test commission guidelines for translating and adapting tests. http://www.intestcom.org/upload/sitefiles/40.pdf alınmıştır. adresinden
  • Vatan, İ., Ocakoğlu, H. ve İrgil, E. (2009). Uludağ üniversitesi tıp fakültesi öğrencilerinde sigara içme durumunun değerlendirilmesi. TSK Koruyucu Hekimlik Bülteni, 8(1), 43-48.
  • Vodanovich, S. J., Wallance, J. C. ve Kass, S. J. (2005). A confirmatory approach to the factor structure of the Boredom Proneness Scale: Evidence for a two-factor short form. Journal of Personality Assessment, 85, 295-303.
  • Wegner, L., Flisher, A. J. ve Muller, M. (2002). Reliability of the leisure boredom scale for use with high school learners in Cape Town, South Africa. Journal of Leisure Research, 34(3), 340-350.
  • Yaman, E. ve Peker, A. (2012). Ergenlerin siber zorbalık ve siber mağduriyete ilişkin algıları. Gaziantep Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 11(3), 819-833.
  • Yin, Z., Katims, D. S. ve Zapata, J. T. (1999). Participation in leisure activities and involvement in delinquency by mexican american adolescents. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 21(2), 170-185.

Boş Zaman Can Sıkıntısı Ölçeği’nin Türkçe’ye Uyarlanması

Year 2014, Volume: 15 Issue: 1, 80 - 95, 10.07.2014
https://doi.org/10.12984/eed.63750

Abstract

Bu çalışmanın amacı Iso-Ahola ve Weissinger (1990) tarafından geliştirilen Boş Zaman Can Sıkıntısı Ölçeği’nin (Leisure Boredom Scale) Türkçe’ye uyarlanarak lise öğrencileri için geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışmalarının yapılmasıdır. Araştırmanın çalışma grubunu İzmir il merkezinde lisede 9.-12. sınıflarda öğrenim gören 469 öğrenci oluşturmaktadır. Ölçeğin yapı geçerliği için yapılan açıklayıcı faktör analizleri sonucunda “Yetkinlik” ve “Motivasyon” olmak üzere iki boyutlu ve 12 maddeden oluşan bir yapıya ulaşılmıştır. Doğrulayıcı faktör analizi ile de bu yapı doğrulanmıştır. Ayırt edici ölçek geçerliği kapsamında Boş Zaman Can Sıkıntısı Ölçeği’nin iki alt boyutu ile Serbest Zaman Doyum Ölçeği’nin altı alt boyutu arasında negatif yönde istatistiksel olarak anlamlı ilişkiler bulunmuştur. Ayrıca hem alt ölçeklere hem de ölçeğin geneline ilişkin Cronbach alfa güvenirlik katsayıları ölçeğin güvenilir bir şekilde kullanılabileceğini göstermektedir.

References

  • Agnew, R. ve Petersen, D. M. (1989). Leisure and delinquency. Social Problems, 36, 332-350.
  • Akbulut, Y. (2010). Sosyal bilimlerde SPSS uygulamaları. İstanbul: İdeal Kültür & Yayıncılık.
  • Arslan, F., Ünal, A. S., Güler, H. ve Kardaş, K. (2006). Okul çağı çocuklarının televizyon izleme alışkanlıklarının incelenmesi. TSK Koruyucu Hekimlik Bülteni, 5(6), 391-401.
  • Beard ve Ragheb (1980). Measuring leisure satisfaction. Journal of Leisure Research, 12(1), 20-33.
  • Bjarnadottir, R. (2004). Modern adolescents’ leisure activities: A new field for education?. Young, 12(4), 299-315.
  • Bradley, G. L. (2010). Skate parks as a context for adolescent development. Journal of Adolescent Research, 25(2), 288-323.
  • Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2012). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı. 17. Baskı. Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
  • Caldwell, L. L. ve Smith, E. (2006). Leisure as a context for youth development and delinquency prevention. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 39(3), 398-418.
  • Coatsworth, J. D., Hiley Sharp, E., Palen, L. A., Darling, N., Cumsille, P. ve Marta, E. (2005). Exploring adolescent self-defining leisure activities and identity experiences across three countries. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 29, 361-370.
  • Fahlman, S. A., Mercer-Lynn, K. B., Flora, D. B. ve Eastwood, J. D. (2013). Development and validation of the multidimensional state boredom scale. Assessment, 20(1), 68-85.
  • Fisher, C. D. (1993). Boredom at work: A neglected concept. Human Relations, 46, 395-417.
  • Gökçe, H. ve Orhan, K. (2011). Serbest zaman doyum ölçeğinin Türkçe geçerlilik güvenirlik çalışması. Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, 22(4), 139-145.
  • Hamilton, J. (1981). Attention, personality, and self-regulation of mood: Absorbing attention and boredom. Progress in Experimental Personality Research, 10, 281-315.
  • Harris, M. B. (2000). Correlates and characteristics of boredom and boredom proneness. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 30, 47-77.
  • Heppner, P. P., Wampold, B. E. ve Kivlinghan, D. M. (2013). Psikolojik danışmada araştırma yöntemleri. (Çev: Siyez, D. M.). Ankara: Mentis Yayıncılık.
  • Hiley Sharp, E., Coffman, D. L., Caldwel, L. L., Smith, E. A., Wegner, L., Vergnagi, L. ve Mathews, C. (2011). Predicting substance use behavior among South African adolescents: The role of leisure experiences across time. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 35, 343.
  • Hu, L. T. ve Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1-55.
  • Iso-Ahola, S. E. ve Weissinger, E. (1987). Leisure and boredom. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 5, 356-364.
  • Iso-Ahola, S. E. ve Weissinger, E. (1990). Perceptions of boredom in leisure: Conceptualization, reliability and validity of the leisure boredom scale. Journal of Leisure Research, 22(1), 1-17.
  • Iso-Ahola, S. E. ve Crowley, E. D. (1991). Adolescent substance abuse and leisure time boredom. Journal of Leisure Research, 23, 260-271.
  • Jennen, C. ve Uhlebuck, G. (2004). Exercise and life satisfaction: Fitness complimentary strategies in the prevention and rehabilitation of ilness. Evidence-based Complimentary and Alternative Medicine, 1(2), 147-165.
  • Jöreskog, K. ve Sörbom, D. (1999). Lisrel 8: Structural Equation Modeling With The SIMPLIS Command Language. Lincolnwood: Scientific Software International.
  • Kim, B. B. (2008). Research update: Perceiving leisure. Parks & Recreation, 43(5), 24-27.
  • Mallinckrodt, B., & Wang. C. C. (2004). Quantitative methods for verifying semantic equivalence of translated research instruments: A Chinese version of the experiences in close relationships. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 51, 368-379.
  • McGee, R., Williams, S., Howden-Chapman, P., Martin, J. ve Kawachi, I. (2006). Participation in clubs and groups from childhood to adolescence and its effect on attachment and self-esteem. Journal of Adolescence, 29, 1-17.
  • Orcutt, J. D. (1984). Contrasting effects of two kinds of boredom on alcohol use. Journal of Drug Issues, 14, 161-173.
  • Palen, L. A. ve Coatsworth, J. D. (2007). Activity-based identity experiences and their relations to problem behavior and psychological wel-being in adolescence. Journal of Adolescence, 30, 721-737.
  • Shaw, S. M., Kleiber, D. A. ve Caldwell, L. L. (1995). Leisure and identity formation in male and female adolescents: A preliminary examination. Journal of Leisure Research, 27, 245-263.
  • Tabachnick, B. G. ve Fidell, L. S. (2001). Using Multivariate Statistics (4th Ed). Needham Heights: Allyn & Bacon.
  • Trottier, A. N., Brown, G. T., Hobson, S. J. G. ve Miller, W. (2002). Reliability and validity of the Leisure Satisfaction Scale (LSS-short form) and adolescent leisure interest profile (ALIP). Occupational Therapy International, 9(2), 131-144.
  • Tze, V.M.C., Klassen, R.M., Daniels, L.M., Li. J.C.H. ve Zhang, X (2013). A cross-cultural validation of the learning-related boredom scale (lrbs) with canadian and chinese college students. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 31(1) 29–40.
  • Uluslararası Test Komisyonu (International Test Commission) (2010). International test commission guidelines for translating and adapting tests. http://www.intestcom.org/upload/sitefiles/40.pdf alınmıştır. adresinden
  • Vatan, İ., Ocakoğlu, H. ve İrgil, E. (2009). Uludağ üniversitesi tıp fakültesi öğrencilerinde sigara içme durumunun değerlendirilmesi. TSK Koruyucu Hekimlik Bülteni, 8(1), 43-48.
  • Vodanovich, S. J., Wallance, J. C. ve Kass, S. J. (2005). A confirmatory approach to the factor structure of the Boredom Proneness Scale: Evidence for a two-factor short form. Journal of Personality Assessment, 85, 295-303.
  • Wegner, L., Flisher, A. J. ve Muller, M. (2002). Reliability of the leisure boredom scale for use with high school learners in Cape Town, South Africa. Journal of Leisure Research, 34(3), 340-350.
  • Yaman, E. ve Peker, A. (2012). Ergenlerin siber zorbalık ve siber mağduriyete ilişkin algıları. Gaziantep Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 11(3), 819-833.
  • Yin, Z., Katims, D. S. ve Zapata, J. T. (1999). Participation in leisure activities and involvement in delinquency by mexican american adolescents. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 21(2), 170-185.
There are 37 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Yağmur Soylu

Diğdem Siyez

Publication Date July 10, 2014
Published in Issue Year 2014 Volume: 15 Issue: 1

Cite

APA Soylu, Y., & Siyez, D. (2014). Boş Zaman Can Sıkıntısı Ölçeği’nin Türkçe’ye Uyarlanması. Ege Eğitim Dergisi, 15(1), 80-95. https://doi.org/10.12984/eed.63750