Systematic Reviews and Meta Analysis
BibTex RIS Cite

Eğitim Alanında Yapılan Kavram Yanılgılarına Yönelik Bilimsel Araştırmaların Bibliyometrik Analizi

Year 2023, Volume: 13 Issue: 2, 545 - 563, 31.07.2023
https://doi.org/10.18039/ajesi.1292388

Abstract

Bu araştırmanın amacı, Web of Science veri tabanında, eğitim araştırmaları kategorisinde yer alan kavram yanılgısı üzerine yayımlanmış makalelerin bibliyometrik analizini gerçekleştirmektir. Bibliyometrik analizler, bir konu alanına yönelik kavramsal gelişmeleri, araştırmacıların zaman içindeki eğilimleri, araştırılan temaları, disiplinlerin sınırlarındaki değişiklikleri belirlemeyi, en üretken akademisyenleri, kurumları ya da ülkeleri tespit etmek ve "büyük resmi" sunmak amacıyla gerçekleştirilmektedir. Bu araştırma betimsel tarama modelinde gerçekleştirilmiştir. Araştırmanın amacı doğrultusunda “minsconception” ve “minsconceptions” anahtar kelimeleri Web of Science veri tabanında “OR” seçeneğiyle “topic” türünde aranmıştır. 01.05.2022 tarihinde gerçekleştirilen tarama sonucunda 3386 makaleye erişilmiştir. Elde edilen verilerin analizi açık kaynak kodlu R programında bulunan R-Studio programlama dilinde “bibliometrix” paketi kullanılarak gerçekleştirilmiştir. Web of Science veri tabanında taranan kavram yanılgısı makalelerini en fazla yayımlayan derginin Journal of Chemical Education (f=310), en çok çalışması olan akademisyenlerin ise Bretz S.L., Treagust D.F. ve Geban, O. oldukları tespit edilmiştir. Kavram yanılgısı konu alanında yaptıkları çalışmaları en yüksek h-indeksi değerine sahip olan yazarların Bretz S.L. Treagust D.F ve Sanger M.J. olduğu tespit edilmiştir. En fazla makale üreten ilk üç ülkenin ABD, Türkiye ve İngiltere olduğu, farklı ülkelerdeki araştırmacılarla en çok uluslararası işbirliğine giden araştırmacıların da 83 makale ile yine ABD’den oldukları görülmektedir. Kavram yanılgısı makaleleri incelendiğinde en fazla kullanılan anahtar kelimelerin ise misconception/misconceptions, conceptual change ve science education olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Yapılan bu çalışmanın kavram yanılgısı konu alanı ile ilgili araştırma yapmayı planlayan akademisyenler için kapsamlı ve detaylı bir projeksiyon ortaya koyacağı düşünülmektedir.

References

  • Aria, M. & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). Bibliometrix: an r-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959-975.
  • Ashlock, R. B. (2006). Error patterns in computation: using error patterns to improve instruction. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  • Başıbüyük, A., Doğar, Ç., Gürses, A., ve Yazıcı, H. (2004). Yüksek öğrenim öğrencilerinin hava ve iklim olaylarını anlama seviyeleri ve kavram yanılgıları. Milli Eğitim Dergisi, 162.
  • Bolsen, T., & Druckman, J. N. (2015). Counteracting the politicization of science. Journal of Communication, 65(5), 745-769. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12171
  • Bozdoğan, K. (2020). A bibliometric analysis of educational studies about “museum”. Participatory Educational Research, 7(3), 162-179.
  • Burrows, N. L., & Mooring, S. R. (2015). Using concept mapping to uncover students' knowledge structures of chemical bonding concepts. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 16(1), 53-66.
  • Büyüköztürk, Ş., Çakmak, E. K., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, Ş., ve Demirel, F. (2016). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
  • Carless, D. (2006). Differing perceptions in the feedback process. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 219-233. DOI: 10.1080/03075070600572132
  • Chadegani, A. A., Salehi, H., Yunus, M. M., Farhadi, H., Fooladi, M., Farhadi, M., & Ebrahim, N. A. (2013). A comparison between two main academic literature collections: web of science and scopus databases. Asia Social Sciences, 9(5), 18-26. doi:10.5539/ass.v9n5p18
  • Cüceloğlu, D. (2013). İnsan ve davranışı psikolojinin temel kavramları. İstanbul: Remzi.
  • Çakır, S. Ö., ve Yürük, N. (1999). Oksijenli ve oksijensiz solunum konusunda kavram yanılgıları teşhis testinin geliştirilmesi ve uygulanması. III. Fen Bilimleri Eğitimi Sempozyumu, 23(25), 193-198.
  • Çaycı, B. (2007). Examining of the effectiveness of conceptual changing approach on concept learning. (PhD Thesis), Gazi University Institute of Educational Sciences, Ankara.
  • Çelik, M. (2022). Erken çocukluk matematik eğitimi çalışmalarının bibliyometrik profili. Türkiye Bilimsel Araştırmalar Dergisi, 7(1), 55-71.
  • Delgado Vázquez, Á., Vázquez Cano, E., Belando Montoro, M. R., & López Meneses, E. J.(2019). Análisis bibliométrico del impacto de la investigación educativa en diversidad funcional y competencia digital: web of science and scopus. Aula Abierta, 48(2), 147-156. Doi: 10.17811/rifie.48.2.2019
  • Doğar, Ç., & Başıbüyük, A. (2005). The understanding levels on weather and climate concepts for primary and secondary students. Gazi University Kastamonu Education Journal, 13(2), 347-358.
  • Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102(46), 16569-16572.
  • Howell, E. L., & Brossard, D. (2021). (Mis)informed about what? What it means to be a science-literate citizen in a digital world. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 118(15). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1912436117
  • Huang, C., Yang, C., Wang, S., Wu, W., Su, J., & Liang, C. (2020). Evolution of topics in education research: a systematic review using bibliometric analysis. Educational Review, 72(3), 281-297. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2019.1566212
  • Hunter, K. H., Rodriguez, J.-M. G., & Becker, N. M.. (2022). A review of research on the teaching and learning of chemical bonding. Journal of Chemical Education, 99(7), 2451-2464. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.2c00034
  • Karaca, A., & Akbaba, B. (2021). Vatandaşlık eğitimine yönelik bibliyometrik araştırma: 1980-2020 yılları arasında yapılan çalışmaların analizi. Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 21(3), 788-804.
  • Karasar, N. (2016). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemi Ankara: Nobel.
  • Karpudewan, M., Roth, W. M., & Chandrakesan, K. (2015). Remediating misconception on climate change among secondary school students in malaysia. Environmental Education Research, 21(4), 631-648.
  • Kılıçoğlu, G. (2011). The impact of conceptual change texts on misconceptions in social studies courses. (Ph Thesis), Gazi University Institute of Educational Sciences, Ankara.
  • Kızılcık, H. S., & Güneş, B. (2011). Developing three-tire misconception test about regular circular motion. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 41, 278-292.
  • Kurtuluş, M. A., & Tatar, N. (2021). An analysis of scientific articles on science misconceptions: a bibliometric research. İlköğretim Online, 20(1), 192-207. doi:10.17051/ilkonline.2021.01.022
  • Laçin Şimşek, C. (2019). Kavram, kavram yanılgıları, tespiti ve giderilmesi. C. L. Şimşek (Ed.), Fen öğretiminde kavram yanılgıları, tespiti ve giderilmesi içinde (ss. 1-22). Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
  • Madani, F., & Weber, C. (2016). The evolution of patent mining: applying bibliometrics analysis and keyword network analysis. World Patent Information, 46, 32-48. doi: 10.1016/j.wpi.2016.05.008
  • Nakhleh, M. B. (1992). Why some students don’t learn chemistry: chemical misconceptions. Journal of Chemical Education, 69(3), 191. doi:10.1021/ed069p191
  • Ninkov, A., Frank, J. R., & Maggio, L. A. (2021). Bibliometrics: methods for studying academic publishing. Perspectives on Medical Education, 11(3), 173-176. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40037-021-00695-4
  • Öçal, M. F. (2018). The case of time axis fallacy: 11th grade students’ intuitively-based misconception in probability and teachers’ corresponding practices. Journal of Qualitative Research in Education, 6(3), 86-105.
  • Palaz, T. (2021). Global citizenship and education: a bibliometric research. International Journal of Education Technology and Scientific Researches, 6(16), 1907-1947. doi:10.35826/ijetsar.416
  • Palaz, T. (2022). Science mapping of international researches on Turkey-based social studies education: a bibliometric analysis. International Online Journal of Education and Teaching (IOJET), 9(1), 46-68.
  • Park, S. & Oliver, J. S. (2008). Revisiting the conceptualisation of pedagogical content knowledge (pck): pck as a conceptual tool to understand teachers as professionals. Research in Science Education, 38(3), 261–284. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-0079049-6
  • Resnick, R. (1980). Misconceptions about einstein: his work and his views. Journal of Chemical Education, 57(12), 854-862.
  • Sanders, M. (1993). Erroneous ideas about respiration: the teacher factor. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(8), 919-934.
  • Senemoğlu, N. (2005). Gelişim öğrenme ve öğretim kuramdan uygulamaya. Ankara: Gazi.
  • Sönmez, Ö. F. (2020). Bibliometric analysis of educational research articles published in the field of social study education based on web of science database, Participatory Educational Research, 7(2), 216-229.
  • Suryadi, A., Kusairi, S., & Husna, D. A. (2020). Comparative study of secondary school students’ and pre-service teachers’ misconception about simple electric circuit. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Indonesia, 16(2), 111-121.
  • Tekkaya, C., Çapa, Y. ve Yılmaz, Ö. (2000). Biyoloji öğretmen adaylarının genel biyoloji konularındaki kavram yanılgıları. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 18, 140-147.
  • Tsaparlis, G., Pappa, E. T., & Byers, B. (2018). Teaching and learning chemical bonding: research-based evidence for misconceptions and conceptual difficulties experienced by students in upper secondary schools and the effect of an enriched text. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 19(4), 1253-1269.
  • Ülgen, G. (2004). Kavram geliştirme kuramlar ve uygulamalar. Ankara: Nobel.
  • Wilhelm, J. A. (2014). Young children do not hold the classic earth’s shadow misconception to explain lunar phases. School Science and Mathematics, 114(7), 349-363.
  • Yazıcı, H., & Samancı, O. (2003). İlköğretim öğrencilerinin sosyal bilgiler ders konuları ile ilgili bazı kavramları anlama düzeyleri. Milli Eğitim Dergisi, 158, 83-90.
  • Yeşiltaş, E., ve Yılmazer, A. (2021). Eğitimde medya okuryazarlığı ile ilgili araştırmalara yönelik bibliyometrik bir analiz. OPUS International Journal of Society Researches, 18(Eğitim Bilimleri Özel Sayısı), 4903-4929. https://doi.org/10.26466/opus.935547

Bibliometric Analysis of Scientific Research on Misconception Conducted in The Field of Education

Year 2023, Volume: 13 Issue: 2, 545 - 563, 31.07.2023
https://doi.org/10.18039/ajesi.1292388

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to perform a bibliometric analysis of articles on misconception in the education research category of the Web of Science (WoS) database. Bibliometric analyses are carried out to identify conceptual developments in a subject area, trends of researchers over time, themes researched, changes in the boundaries of disciplines, and the most productive academics, institutions, or countries and to present the “big picture”. This study used the descriptive survey model. In line with the purpose of the study, the keywords “misconception” and “misconceptions” were searched in “topic” in the WoS database using the “OR” option. As a result of the survey carried out on 12.01.2023, 3,545 articles were accessed. The obtained data were analyzed using the “bibliometrix” package in the RStudio programming language, included in the open-source R program. Journal of Chemical Education (f=310) was found to be the journal publishing the most articles on misconception in the WoS database, and the academics with the most studies were determined to be Bretz S. L., Treagust D. F., and Geban, O. The authors whose studies on misconception have the highest h-index values are Bretz S. L., Treagust D. F., and Sanger M. J. The first three countries producing the most articles on misconception are the USA, Turkey, and the United Kingdom, and the researchers who have the most international collaborations with researchers from different countries are also from the USA (83 articles). The most used keywords are “misconception/misconceptions”, “conceptual change”, and “science education”. This study is anticipated to present a comprehensive and detailed projection for academics who plan to conduct research in the subject area of misconception. In addition to different studies may be designed focusing on other dimensions of concept teaching.

References

  • Aria, M. & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). Bibliometrix: an r-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959-975.
  • Ashlock, R. B. (2006). Error patterns in computation: using error patterns to improve instruction. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  • Başıbüyük, A., Doğar, Ç., Gürses, A., ve Yazıcı, H. (2004). Yüksek öğrenim öğrencilerinin hava ve iklim olaylarını anlama seviyeleri ve kavram yanılgıları. Milli Eğitim Dergisi, 162.
  • Bolsen, T., & Druckman, J. N. (2015). Counteracting the politicization of science. Journal of Communication, 65(5), 745-769. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12171
  • Bozdoğan, K. (2020). A bibliometric analysis of educational studies about “museum”. Participatory Educational Research, 7(3), 162-179.
  • Burrows, N. L., & Mooring, S. R. (2015). Using concept mapping to uncover students' knowledge structures of chemical bonding concepts. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 16(1), 53-66.
  • Büyüköztürk, Ş., Çakmak, E. K., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, Ş., ve Demirel, F. (2016). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
  • Carless, D. (2006). Differing perceptions in the feedback process. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 219-233. DOI: 10.1080/03075070600572132
  • Chadegani, A. A., Salehi, H., Yunus, M. M., Farhadi, H., Fooladi, M., Farhadi, M., & Ebrahim, N. A. (2013). A comparison between two main academic literature collections: web of science and scopus databases. Asia Social Sciences, 9(5), 18-26. doi:10.5539/ass.v9n5p18
  • Cüceloğlu, D. (2013). İnsan ve davranışı psikolojinin temel kavramları. İstanbul: Remzi.
  • Çakır, S. Ö., ve Yürük, N. (1999). Oksijenli ve oksijensiz solunum konusunda kavram yanılgıları teşhis testinin geliştirilmesi ve uygulanması. III. Fen Bilimleri Eğitimi Sempozyumu, 23(25), 193-198.
  • Çaycı, B. (2007). Examining of the effectiveness of conceptual changing approach on concept learning. (PhD Thesis), Gazi University Institute of Educational Sciences, Ankara.
  • Çelik, M. (2022). Erken çocukluk matematik eğitimi çalışmalarının bibliyometrik profili. Türkiye Bilimsel Araştırmalar Dergisi, 7(1), 55-71.
  • Delgado Vázquez, Á., Vázquez Cano, E., Belando Montoro, M. R., & López Meneses, E. J.(2019). Análisis bibliométrico del impacto de la investigación educativa en diversidad funcional y competencia digital: web of science and scopus. Aula Abierta, 48(2), 147-156. Doi: 10.17811/rifie.48.2.2019
  • Doğar, Ç., & Başıbüyük, A. (2005). The understanding levels on weather and climate concepts for primary and secondary students. Gazi University Kastamonu Education Journal, 13(2), 347-358.
  • Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102(46), 16569-16572.
  • Howell, E. L., & Brossard, D. (2021). (Mis)informed about what? What it means to be a science-literate citizen in a digital world. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 118(15). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1912436117
  • Huang, C., Yang, C., Wang, S., Wu, W., Su, J., & Liang, C. (2020). Evolution of topics in education research: a systematic review using bibliometric analysis. Educational Review, 72(3), 281-297. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2019.1566212
  • Hunter, K. H., Rodriguez, J.-M. G., & Becker, N. M.. (2022). A review of research on the teaching and learning of chemical bonding. Journal of Chemical Education, 99(7), 2451-2464. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.2c00034
  • Karaca, A., & Akbaba, B. (2021). Vatandaşlık eğitimine yönelik bibliyometrik araştırma: 1980-2020 yılları arasında yapılan çalışmaların analizi. Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 21(3), 788-804.
  • Karasar, N. (2016). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemi Ankara: Nobel.
  • Karpudewan, M., Roth, W. M., & Chandrakesan, K. (2015). Remediating misconception on climate change among secondary school students in malaysia. Environmental Education Research, 21(4), 631-648.
  • Kılıçoğlu, G. (2011). The impact of conceptual change texts on misconceptions in social studies courses. (Ph Thesis), Gazi University Institute of Educational Sciences, Ankara.
  • Kızılcık, H. S., & Güneş, B. (2011). Developing three-tire misconception test about regular circular motion. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 41, 278-292.
  • Kurtuluş, M. A., & Tatar, N. (2021). An analysis of scientific articles on science misconceptions: a bibliometric research. İlköğretim Online, 20(1), 192-207. doi:10.17051/ilkonline.2021.01.022
  • Laçin Şimşek, C. (2019). Kavram, kavram yanılgıları, tespiti ve giderilmesi. C. L. Şimşek (Ed.), Fen öğretiminde kavram yanılgıları, tespiti ve giderilmesi içinde (ss. 1-22). Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
  • Madani, F., & Weber, C. (2016). The evolution of patent mining: applying bibliometrics analysis and keyword network analysis. World Patent Information, 46, 32-48. doi: 10.1016/j.wpi.2016.05.008
  • Nakhleh, M. B. (1992). Why some students don’t learn chemistry: chemical misconceptions. Journal of Chemical Education, 69(3), 191. doi:10.1021/ed069p191
  • Ninkov, A., Frank, J. R., & Maggio, L. A. (2021). Bibliometrics: methods for studying academic publishing. Perspectives on Medical Education, 11(3), 173-176. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40037-021-00695-4
  • Öçal, M. F. (2018). The case of time axis fallacy: 11th grade students’ intuitively-based misconception in probability and teachers’ corresponding practices. Journal of Qualitative Research in Education, 6(3), 86-105.
  • Palaz, T. (2021). Global citizenship and education: a bibliometric research. International Journal of Education Technology and Scientific Researches, 6(16), 1907-1947. doi:10.35826/ijetsar.416
  • Palaz, T. (2022). Science mapping of international researches on Turkey-based social studies education: a bibliometric analysis. International Online Journal of Education and Teaching (IOJET), 9(1), 46-68.
  • Park, S. & Oliver, J. S. (2008). Revisiting the conceptualisation of pedagogical content knowledge (pck): pck as a conceptual tool to understand teachers as professionals. Research in Science Education, 38(3), 261–284. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-0079049-6
  • Resnick, R. (1980). Misconceptions about einstein: his work and his views. Journal of Chemical Education, 57(12), 854-862.
  • Sanders, M. (1993). Erroneous ideas about respiration: the teacher factor. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(8), 919-934.
  • Senemoğlu, N. (2005). Gelişim öğrenme ve öğretim kuramdan uygulamaya. Ankara: Gazi.
  • Sönmez, Ö. F. (2020). Bibliometric analysis of educational research articles published in the field of social study education based on web of science database, Participatory Educational Research, 7(2), 216-229.
  • Suryadi, A., Kusairi, S., & Husna, D. A. (2020). Comparative study of secondary school students’ and pre-service teachers’ misconception about simple electric circuit. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Indonesia, 16(2), 111-121.
  • Tekkaya, C., Çapa, Y. ve Yılmaz, Ö. (2000). Biyoloji öğretmen adaylarının genel biyoloji konularındaki kavram yanılgıları. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 18, 140-147.
  • Tsaparlis, G., Pappa, E. T., & Byers, B. (2018). Teaching and learning chemical bonding: research-based evidence for misconceptions and conceptual difficulties experienced by students in upper secondary schools and the effect of an enriched text. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 19(4), 1253-1269.
  • Ülgen, G. (2004). Kavram geliştirme kuramlar ve uygulamalar. Ankara: Nobel.
  • Wilhelm, J. A. (2014). Young children do not hold the classic earth’s shadow misconception to explain lunar phases. School Science and Mathematics, 114(7), 349-363.
  • Yazıcı, H., & Samancı, O. (2003). İlköğretim öğrencilerinin sosyal bilgiler ders konuları ile ilgili bazı kavramları anlama düzeyleri. Milli Eğitim Dergisi, 158, 83-90.
  • Yeşiltaş, E., ve Yılmazer, A. (2021). Eğitimde medya okuryazarlığı ile ilgili araştırmalara yönelik bibliyometrik bir analiz. OPUS International Journal of Society Researches, 18(Eğitim Bilimleri Özel Sayısı), 4903-4929. https://doi.org/10.26466/opus.935547
There are 44 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Other Fields of Education
Journal Section Systematic Review and Meta Analysis
Authors

Adem Karaca 0000-0003-4110-6648

Gökçe Kılıçoğlu 0000-0002-6125-1853

Sadettin Erbaş 0000-0002-5150-9216

Publication Date July 31, 2023
Submission Date May 4, 2023
Published in Issue Year 2023 Volume: 13 Issue: 2

Cite

APA Karaca, A., Kılıçoğlu, G., & Erbaş, S. (2023). Bibliometric Analysis of Scientific Research on Misconception Conducted in The Field of Education. Anadolu Journal of Educational Sciences International, 13(2), 545-563. https://doi.org/10.18039/ajesi.1292388
AMA Karaca A, Kılıçoğlu G, Erbaş S. Bibliometric Analysis of Scientific Research on Misconception Conducted in The Field of Education. AJESI. July 2023;13(2):545-563. doi:10.18039/ajesi.1292388
Chicago Karaca, Adem, Gökçe Kılıçoğlu, and Sadettin Erbaş. “Bibliometric Analysis of Scientific Research on Misconception Conducted in The Field of Education”. Anadolu Journal of Educational Sciences International 13, no. 2 (July 2023): 545-63. https://doi.org/10.18039/ajesi.1292388.
EndNote Karaca A, Kılıçoğlu G, Erbaş S (July 1, 2023) Bibliometric Analysis of Scientific Research on Misconception Conducted in The Field of Education. Anadolu Journal of Educational Sciences International 13 2 545–563.
IEEE A. Karaca, G. Kılıçoğlu, and S. Erbaş, “Bibliometric Analysis of Scientific Research on Misconception Conducted in The Field of Education”, AJESI, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 545–563, 2023, doi: 10.18039/ajesi.1292388.
ISNAD Karaca, Adem et al. “Bibliometric Analysis of Scientific Research on Misconception Conducted in The Field of Education”. Anadolu Journal of Educational Sciences International 13/2 (July 2023), 545-563. https://doi.org/10.18039/ajesi.1292388.
JAMA Karaca A, Kılıçoğlu G, Erbaş S. Bibliometric Analysis of Scientific Research on Misconception Conducted in The Field of Education. AJESI. 2023;13:545–563.
MLA Karaca, Adem et al. “Bibliometric Analysis of Scientific Research on Misconception Conducted in The Field of Education”. Anadolu Journal of Educational Sciences International, vol. 13, no. 2, 2023, pp. 545-63, doi:10.18039/ajesi.1292388.
Vancouver Karaca A, Kılıçoğlu G, Erbaş S. Bibliometric Analysis of Scientific Research on Misconception Conducted in The Field of Education. AJESI. 2023;13(2):545-63.